Öksüz Çiğdem, Akel Burcu Semin, Aran Orkun Tahir, Sığırtmaç İlkem Ceren, Leblebicioğlu A Gürsel
Hacettepe University, Faculty of Health Sciences, Occupational Therapy, Ankara, Turkey.
Hacettepe University, Faculty of Health Sciences, Occupational Therapy, Ankara, Turkey.
Acta Orthop Traumatol Turc. 2017 Jul;51(4):325-330. doi: 10.1016/j.aott.2017.05.003. Epub 2017 Jul 11.
The aim of this study was to compare the activities listed in DASH, MHQ, QuickDASH with the activities listed in Canadian Occupational Performance Measure (COPM) in a Turkish patient population with hand injury.
COPM questionnaire was administered to 163 participants (61 male and 102 female; mean age 40.72 ± 13.70 years). The activities that were stated in COPM were categorized and checked whether they were present in DASH-T, MHQ, QuickDASH.
The highest rated stated activities were "carrying a heavy object" (39.2%), "cleaning the house" (25.7%) and "writing" (15.9%). DASH reflects 30% whereas MHQ and QuickDASH reflect 16.32% and 10.2% of the problematic activities, respectively.
None of three questionnaires have satisfactory results for reflecting the problematic activities among hand injured Turkish people. Open ended interviews should be irrevocable part of assessment process in order to describe a person-center treatment program.
本研究旨在比较手部受伤的土耳其患者群体中，DASH、MHQ、QuickDASH中列出的活动与加拿大职业表现测量量表（COPM）中列出的活动。
对163名参与者（61名男性和102名女性；平均年龄40.72±13.70岁）进行COPM问卷调查。对COPM中列出的活动进行分类，并检查它们是否存在于DASH-T、MHQ、QuickDASH中。
评分最高的活动是“搬运重物”（39.2%）、“打扫房屋”（25.7%）和“书写”（15.9%）。DASH反映了30%的问题活动，而MHQ和QuickDASH分别反映了16.32%和10.2%的问题活动。
对于反映手部受伤的土耳其人群中的问题活动，这三份问卷均未取得令人满意的结果。为了制定以患者为中心的治疗方案，开放式访谈应成为评估过程中不可或缺的一部分。
