Department of Bioinformatics and Computational Biology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas.
Department of Urology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas.
Clin Cancer Res. 2017 Nov 1;23(21):6686-6696. doi: 10.1158/1078-0432.CCR-17-1057. Epub 2017 Jul 14.
Sarcomatoid renal cell carcinoma (SRCC) ranks among the most aggressive clinicopathologic phenotypes of RCC. However, the paucity of high-quality, genome-wide molecular examinations of SRCC has hindered our understanding of this entity. We interrogated the mutational, copy number, and transcriptional characteristics of SRCC and compared these data with those of nonsarcomatoid RCC (RCC). We evaluated whole-exome sequencing, single-nucleotide polymorphism, and RNA sequencing data from patients with SRCC ( = 65) and RCC ( = 598) across different parent RCC subtypes, including clear-cell RCC, papillary RCC, and chromophobe RCC subtypes. SRCC was molecularly discrete from RCC and clustered according to its parent RCC subtype, though with upregulation of TGFβ signaling across all subtypes. The epithelioid (E-) and spindled (S-) histologic components of SRCC did not show differences in mutational load among cancer-related genes despite a higher mutational burden in S-. Notably, sarcomatoid clear-cell RCC (SccRCC) showed significantly fewer deletions at 3p21-25, a lower rate of two-hit loss for and , and more mutations in , , and compared with ccRCC. A two-hit loss involving predicted for ccRCC and a better prognosis, whereas mutations in , , or predicted for SccRCC and worse prognosis. SRCC segregates by parent subtype, and SccRCC has a fundamentally different early molecular pathogenesis, usually lacking the classic 3p21-25 deletion and showing distinctive mutational and transcriptional profiles. These features prompt a more precise molecular classification of RCC, with diagnostic, prognostic, and therapeutic implications. .
肉瘤样肾细胞癌 (SRCC) 是肾细胞癌 (RCC) 中最具侵袭性的临床病理表型之一。然而,由于缺乏对 SRCC 的高质量、全基因组分子检测,我们对这种实体的认识受到了阻碍。我们研究了 SRCC 的突变、拷贝数和转录特征,并将这些数据与非肉瘤样 RCC (RCC) 的数据进行了比较。我们评估了来自不同 RCC 亚型(包括透明细胞 RCC、乳头状 RCC 和嫌色细胞 RCC 亚型)的 SRCC(=65 例)和 RCC(=598 例)患者的全外显子测序、单核苷酸多态性和 RNA 测序数据。SRCC 与 RCC 在分子上是不同的,并且根据其母 RCC 亚型聚类,尽管所有亚型中 TGFβ 信号都上调。尽管在 S-中突变负担较高,但 SRCC 的上皮样 (E-) 和梭形 (S-) 组织学成分在癌相关基因中的突变负荷没有差异。值得注意的是,肉瘤样透明细胞 RCC (SccRCC) 在 3p21-25 上的缺失明显较少, 和 的双打击缺失率较低,并且与 ccRCC 相比, 、 和 中的突变更多。涉及 的双打击缺失预示着 ccRCC 的预后较好,而 、 或 中的突变预示着 SccRCC 的预后较差。SRCC 按母亚型分类,SccRCC 的早期分子发病机制完全不同,通常缺乏经典的 3p21-25 缺失,表现出独特的突变和转录谱。这些特征提示对 RCC 进行更精确的分子分类,具有诊断、预后和治疗意义。