Alonso Salinas Gonzalo Luis, Sanmartin Marcelo, Pascual Izco Marina, Rincon Luis Miguel, Pastor Pueyo Pablo, Marco Del Castillo Alvaro, Garcia Guerrero Alberto, Caravaca Perez Pedro, Recio-Mayoral Alejandro, Camino Asuncion, Jimenez-Mena Manuel, Zamorano José Luis
Cardiology Department, Hospital Ramón y Cajal, University of Alcalá, Madrid, Spain.
Cardiology Department, Hospital Virgen Macarena, Seville, Spain.
Clin Cardiol. 2017 Oct;40(10):925-931. doi: 10.1002/clc.22749. Epub 2017 Jul 16.
Acute coronary syndrome (ACS) patients are increasingly older. Conventional prognostic scales include chronological age but do not consider vulnerability. In elderly patients, a frail phenotype represents a better reflection of biological age.
This study aims to determine the prevalence of frailty and its influence on patients age ≥75 years with ACS.
Patients age ≥75 years admitted due to type 1 myocardial infarction were included in 2 tertiary hospitals, and clinical data were collected prospectively. Frailty was defined at admission using the previously validated Survey of Health Ageing and Retirement in Europe Frailty Index (SHARE-FI) tool. The primary endpoint was the combination of death or nonfatal myocardial reinfarction during a follow-up of 6 months. Major bleeding (hemoglobin decrease ≥3 g/dL or transfusion needed) and readmission rates were also explored.
A total of 234 consecutive patients were included. Frail patients (40.2%) had a higher-risk profile, based on higher age and comorbidities. On multivariate analysis, frailty was an independent predictor of the combination of death or nonfatal myocardial reinfarction (adjusted hazard ratio [aHR]: 2.54, 95% confidence interval [CI]: 1.12-5.79), an independent predictor of the combination of death, nonfatal myocardial reinfarction, or major bleeding (aHR: 2.14, 95% CI: 1.13-4.04), and an independent predictor of readmission (aHR: 1.80, 95% CI: 1.00-3.22).
Frailty phenotype at admission is common among elderly patients with ACS and is an independent predictor for severe adverse events. It should be considered in future risk-stratification models.
急性冠状动脉综合征(ACS)患者的年龄越来越大。传统的预后量表包括实际年龄,但未考虑脆弱性。在老年患者中,虚弱表型更能反映生物学年龄。
本研究旨在确定≥75岁ACS患者中虚弱的患病率及其影响。
两家三级医院纳入了因1型心肌梗死入院的≥75岁患者,并前瞻性收集临床数据。入院时使用先前验证的欧洲健康、老龄化和退休调查虚弱指数(SHARE-FI)工具定义虚弱。主要终点是6个月随访期间死亡或非致命性心肌再梗死的联合发生情况。还探讨了大出血(血红蛋白下降≥3 g/dL或需要输血)和再入院率。
共纳入234例连续患者。基于更高的年龄和合并症,虚弱患者(40.2%)具有更高的风险特征。多因素分析显示,虚弱是死亡或非致命性心肌再梗死联合发生的独立预测因素(调整后危险比[aHR]:2.54,95%置信区间[CI]:1.12 - 5.79),是死亡、非致命性心肌再梗死或大出血联合发生的独立预测因素(aHR:2.14,95% CI:1.13 - 4.04),也是再入院的独立预测因素(aHR:1.80,95% CI:1.00 - 3.22)。
入院时的虚弱表型在老年ACS患者中很常见,是严重不良事件的独立预测因素。应在未来的风险分层模型中予以考虑。