Suppr超能文献

旁观者干预与院外心脏骤停幸存者住院时间和入住重症监护病房的关系。

Association of bystander interventions and hospital length of stay and admission to intensive care unit in out-of-hospital cardiac arrest survivors.

机构信息

Department of Anesthesiology and Intensive Care Medicine, Aalborg University Hospital, Denmark; Clinical Institute, Aalborg University, Denmark.

Department of Cardiology, Aalborg University Hospital, Aalborg, Denmark; Unit of Epidemiology and Biostatistics, Aalborg University Hospital, Aalborg, Denmark.

出版信息

Resuscitation. 2017 Oct;119:99-106. doi: 10.1016/j.resuscitation.2017.07.014. Epub 2017 Jul 15.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

The impact of bystander interventions on post-arrest hospital course is sparsely studied. We examined the association between bystander interventions and length of hospital stay and admission to intensive care unit (ICU) in one-day survivors after OHCA.

METHODS

This cohort study linked data of 4641 one-day OHCA survivors from 2001 to 2014 to data on hospital length of stay and ICU admission. We examined associations between bystander efforts and outcomes using regression, adjusted for age, sex, comorbidities, calendar year and witnessed status. We divided bystander efforts into three categories: 1. No bystander interventions; 2.Bystander CPR only; 3. Bystander defibrillation with or without bystander CPR.

RESULTS

For patients surviving to hospital discharge, hospital length of stay was 20days for patients without bystander interventions, compared to 16 for bystander CPR, and 13 for bystander defibrillation. 82% of patients without bystander interventions were admitted to ICU compared to 77.2% for bystander CPR, and 61.2% for bystander defibrillation. In-hospital mortality was 60% in the first category compared to 40.5% and 21.7% in the two latter categories. In regression models, bystander CPR and bystander defibrillation were associated with a reduction of length of hospital stay of 21% (Estimate: 0.79 [95% CI: 0.72-0.86]) and 32% (Estimate: 0.68 [95% CI: 0.59-0.78]), respectively. Both bystander CPR (OR: 0.94 [95% CI: 0.91-0.97]) and bystander defibrillation (OR: 0.81 [0.76-0.85]), were associated with lower risk of ICU admission.

CONCLUSIONS

Bystander interventions were associated with reduced hospital length of stay and ICU admission, suggesting that these efforts improve recovery in OHCA survivors.

摘要

背景

旁观者干预对复苏后住院过程的影响研究甚少。我们研究了旁观者干预与 OHCA 后一天幸存者的住院时间和入住 ICU 的关系。

方法

本队列研究将 2001 年至 2014 年 4641 名一天幸存者的 OHCA 数据与住院时间和 ICU 入住数据相链接。我们使用回归分析,调整年龄、性别、合并症、年份和目击者状态后,观察旁观者干预与结局的关系。我们将旁观者干预分为三类:1. 无旁观者干预;2. 旁观者心肺复苏;3. 旁观者除颤加或不加旁观者心肺复苏。

结果

对于存活至出院的患者,无旁观者干预者的住院时间为 20 天,旁观者心肺复苏者为 16 天,旁观者除颤者为 13 天。无旁观者干预者中 82%入住 ICU,而旁观者心肺复苏者为 77.2%,旁观者除颤者为 61.2%。第 1 类的院内死亡率为 60%,而后两类分别为 40.5%和 21.7%。在回归模型中,旁观者心肺复苏和旁观者除颤与住院时间分别缩短 21%(估计值:0.79 [95%CI:0.72-0.86])和 32%(估计值:0.68 [95%CI:0.59-0.78])有关。旁观者心肺复苏(OR:0.94 [95%CI:0.91-0.97])和旁观者除颤(OR:0.81 [0.76-0.85])均与 ICU 入住率降低有关。

结论

旁观者干预与住院时间和 ICU 入住减少有关,提示这些干预措施改善了 OHCA 幸存者的恢复。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验