* These two authors share first authorship; Department of Anesthesiology, Intensive Care Medicine, Emergency Medicine, and Pain Therapy, Klinik am Eichert, ALB FILS Kliniken, Göppingen; Institute for Emergency Medicine and Department of Anesthesiology and Intensive Care Medicine, Kiel Campus, University Hospital Schleswig-Holstein; City of Münster, Fire Department; Intensive Care Transport Mecklenburg-Vorpommern, German Red Cross Parchim; Department of Anesthesiology, Carl Gustav Carus University Hospital, Dresden; Faculty of Medicine, Institute for Research in Operative Medicine, Department of Statistics and Registry Research, Witten/Herdecke University, Cologne, Germany.
Dtsch Arztebl Int. 2018 Aug 20;115(33-34):541-548. doi: 10.3238/arztebl.2018.0541.
Out of hospital cardiac arrest (OHCA) is one of the more common causes of death in Germany. Ambulance response time is an important planning parameter for emergency medical services (EMS) systems. We studied the effect of ambulance response time on survival after resuscitation from OHCA.
We analyzed data from the German Resuscitation Registry for the years 2010-2016. First, we used a multivariate logistic regression analysis to determine the effect of ambulance response time (defined as the interval from the alarm to the arrival of the first rescue vehicle) on the hospital-discharge rate (in percent), depending on various factors, including resuscitation by bystanders. Second, we compared faster and slower EMS systems (defined as those arriving on the scene within 8 minutes in more than 75% of cases or in ≤ 75% of cases) with respect to the frequency of resuscitation and the number of surviving patients.
Our analysis of data from a total of 10 853 patients in the logistical regression model revealed that the rate of hospital discharge was significantly affected by the ambulance response time, bystander resuscitation, past medical history, age, witnessed vs. unwitnessed collapse, the initial heart rhythm, and the site of the collapse. The success of resuscitation was inversely related to the ambulance response time; thus, among patients who did not receive bystander resuscitation, the discharge rate declined from 12.9% at a mean response time of 1 minute and 10 seconds to 6.4% at a mean response time of 9 minutes and 47 seconds. Twelve faster EMS systems and 13 slower ones were identified, with a total of 9669 and 7865 resuscitated patients, respectively. The faster EMS systems initiated resuscitation more frequently and also had a higher discharge rate with good neurological outcome in proportion to the population of the catchment area (7.7 versus 5.6 persons per 100 000 population per year, odds ratio [OR] 0.72, 95% confidence interval [0.66; 0.79], p<0.001).
Rapid ambulance response is associated with a higher rate of survival from OHCA with good neurological outcome. The response time, independently of whether bystander resuscitation measures are provided, ha^ a significant independent effect on the survival rate. In drawing conclusions from these findings, one should bear in mind that this was a retrospective registry study, with the corresponding limitations.
院外心搏骤停(OHCA)是德国较为常见的死亡原因之一。救护车反应时间是紧急医疗服务(EMS)系统的重要规划参数。我们研究了救护车反应时间对 OHCA 复苏后存活的影响。
我们分析了 2010-2016 年德国复苏登记处的数据。首先,我们使用多变量逻辑回归分析来确定救护车反应时间(定义为从报警到第一救援车辆到达的时间间隔)对出院率(百分比)的影响,考虑了包括旁观者复苏在内的各种因素。其次,我们比较了快速和慢速 EMS 系统(定义为在超过 75%的情况下在 8 分钟内到达现场或在≤75%的情况下到达现场)在复苏频率和存活患者数量方面的差异。
在逻辑回归模型中对总共 10853 例患者的数据进行分析表明,救护车反应时间、旁观者复苏、既往病史、年龄、目击与非目击猝倒、初始心搏节律以及猝倒部位均显著影响出院率。复苏的成功率与救护车反应时间呈反比;因此,在未接受旁观者复苏的患者中,从平均反应时间为 1 分 10 秒时的出院率 12.9%下降至平均反应时间为 9 分 47 秒时的 6.4%。确定了 12 个快速 EMS 系统和 13 个慢速 EMS 系统,分别有 9669 例和 7865 例接受了复苏。快速 EMS 系统更频繁地启动复苏,并且与该流域人口比例相比,出院率更高,神经功能良好的复苏患者比例也更高(每 10 万人每年为 7.7 人,而 5.6 人,比值比[OR]0.72,95%置信区间[0.66;0.79],p<0.001)。
快速的救护车反应与 OHCA 后具有良好神经功能结局的生存率升高有关。反应时间(无论旁观者复苏措施是否提供)独立于生存率具有显著的独立影响。在得出这些发现的结论时,应注意这是一项回顾性登记研究,存在相应的局限性。