Nakatsu Noriyuki, Igarashi Yoshinobu, Aoshi Taiki, Hamaguchi Isao, Saito Masumichi, Mizukami Takuo, Momose Haruka, Ishii Ken J, Yamada Hiroshi
Toxicogenomics Informatics Project, National Institute of Biomedical Innovation, Health and Nutrition.
Laboratory of Adjuvant Innovation, National Institute of Biomedical Innovation, Health and Nutrition.
J Toxicol Sci. 2017;42(4):491-497. doi: 10.2131/jts.42.491.
Diethyl ether (ether) had been widely used in Japan for anesthesia, despite its explosive properties and toxicity to both humans and animals. We also had used ether as an anesthetic for euthanizing rats for research in the Toxicogenomics Project (TGP). Because the use of ether for these purposes will likely cease, it is required to select an alternative anesthetic which is validated for consistency with existing TGP data acquired under ether anesthesia. We therefore compared two alternative anesthetic candidates, isoflurane and pentobarbital, with ether in terms of hematological findings, serum biochemical parameters, and gene expressions. As a result, few differences among the three agents were observed. In hematological and serum biochemistry analysis, no significant changes were found. In gene expression analysis, four known genes were extracted as differentially expressed genes in the liver of rats anesthetized with ether, isoflurane, or pentobarbital. However, no significant relationships were detected using gene ontology, pathway, or gene enrichment analyses by DAVID and TargetMine. Surprisingly, although it was expected that the lung would be affected by administration via inhalation, only one differentially expressed gene was extracted in the lung. Taken together, our data indicate that there are no significant differences among ether, isoflurane, and pentobarbital with respect to effects on hematological parameters, serum biochemistry parameters, and gene expression. Based on its smallest affect to existing data and its safety profile for humans and animals, we suggest isoflurane as a suitable alternative anesthetic for use in rat euthanasia in toxicogenomics analysis.
尽管乙醚具有爆炸性且对人和动物都有毒性,但它在日本曾被广泛用于麻醉。我们也曾在毒理基因组学项目(TGP)的研究中使用乙醚对大鼠实施安乐死麻醉。由于可能不再将乙醚用于这些目的,因此需要选择一种经验证可与在乙醚麻醉下获取的现有TGP数据保持一致性的替代麻醉剂。因此,我们就血液学检查结果、血清生化参数和基因表达方面,将两种替代麻醉剂候选物异氟烷和戊巴比妥与乙醚进行了比较。结果发现,这三种药剂之间几乎没有差异。在血液学和血清生化分析中,未发现显著变化。在基因表达分析中,提取了四个已知基因作为在接受乙醚、异氟烷或戊巴比妥麻醉的大鼠肝脏中差异表达的基因。然而,使用DAVID和TargetMine进行基因本体论、通路或基因富集分析时,未检测到显著关联。令人惊讶的是,尽管预计肺部会受到吸入给药的影响,但在肺中仅提取到一个差异表达基因。综上所述,我们的数据表明,在对血液学参数、血清生化参数和基因表达的影响方面,乙醚、异氟烷和戊巴比妥之间没有显著差异。基于其对现有数据的影响最小以及对人和动物的安全性,我们建议将异氟烷作为毒理基因组学分析中用于大鼠安乐死的合适替代麻醉剂。