Popovici Ioana, Maclean Johanna Catherine, Hijazi Bushra, Radakrishnan Sharmini
Department of Sociobehavioral and Administrative Pharmacy, Nova Southeastern University, Fort Lauderdale, FL, USA.
Department of Economics, Temple University, Philadelphia, PA, USA.
Health Econ. 2018 Feb;27(2):294-305. doi: 10.1002/hec.3548. Epub 2017 Jul 18.
Nonmedical use of prescription opioids has reached epidemic levels in the United States and globally. In response, federal, state, and local governments are taking actions to address substantial increases in prescription opioid addiction and its associated harms. This study examines the effect of two state laws specifically designed to curtail access to prescription opioids to nonmedical users: pain management clinic and doctor shopping laws. We use administrative data on overdose deaths and admissions to specialty substance use disorder treatment coupled with a differences-in-differences design. Our findings suggest that both pain management clinic and doctor shopping laws have the potential to reduce prescription opioid overdose deaths. Moreover, doctor shopping laws appear to reduce prescription opioid treatment admissions. As many states have adopted these laws in recent years, the full effects of the laws may not yet be realized. Future research using more postlaw passage data should reevaluate the effectiveness of these laws.
在美国及全球范围内,处方类阿片药物的非医疗用途已达到流行程度。作为回应,联邦、州和地方政府正在采取行动,以应对处方类阿片药物成瘾现象的大幅增加及其相关危害。本研究考察了两项专门旨在减少非医疗使用者获取处方类阿片药物的州法律的效果:疼痛管理诊所法和“医生购物”法。我们使用了过量用药死亡和专科物质使用障碍治疗机构收治情况的行政数据,并采用了双重差分设计。我们的研究结果表明,疼痛管理诊所法和“医生购物”法都有可能减少处方类阿片药物过量用药死亡人数。此外,“医生购物”法似乎还能减少处方类阿片药物治疗机构的收治人数。由于近年来许多州都通过了这些法律,这些法律的全部效果可能尚未显现。未来利用更多法律通过后的数据进行的研究,应该重新评估这些法律的有效性。