Suppr超能文献

经皮肾镜取石术微型化的关键评价:更小是否更好?

A Critical Review of Miniaturised Percutaneous Nephrolithotomy: Is Smaller Better?

机构信息

Department of Urology, IRCCS San Raffaele Hospital, Ville Turro Division, Milan, Italy.

Department of Urology, IRCCS San Raffaele Hospital, Ville Turro Division, Milan, Italy.

出版信息

Eur Urol Focus. 2017 Feb;3(1):56-61. doi: 10.1016/j.euf.2017.05.001. Epub 2017 May 12.

Abstract

CONTEXT

In an effort to reduce morbidity related to percutaneous nephrolithotomy (PCNL), some investigators have progressively introduced miniaturised approaches. The development of miniaturised nephroscopes facilitated widespread dissemination of these techniques and a significant expansion of the role of PCNL in endourology.

OBJECTIVE

To discuss the different techniques comprising modern PCNL and identify the pros and cons of each of them.

EVIDENCE ACQUISITION

Data for this review were identified through a search of PubMed, including studies published in the last 20 yr in core clinical journals in English. The search terms included "urolithiasis", "nephrolithiasis", or "urinary stones" in combination with "miniaturised PCNL", "mini-PCNL", "micro-PCNL", "minimally invasive PCNL", and "ultra-mini PCNL". Publications relevant to the subject were retrieved and critically appraised.

EVIDENCE SYNTHESIS

The indications for miniaturised PCNL have not been standardised yet. Even though data in the literature reveal limitations and conflicting results, these techniques seem promising in terms of effectiveness and safety for the treatment of renal stones. The development of miniaturised scopes facilitated knowledge of the physics behind the vacuum cleaner effect generated during procedures, and greater efficacy of holmium laser generators and surgeon skill have led to progressive expansion of the indications for miniaturised techniques. Well-designed, randomised, multi-institutional studies are needed to better understand the indications for these miniaturised techniques before considering them a standard procedure for potential replacement of conventional PCNL.

CONCLUSIONS

Miniaturised PCNL represents a valuable new tool in the armamentarium of modern endourologists, capable of offering good outcomes with lower complications rates compared to the standard technique and higher cost effectiveness compared to flexible ureteroscopy.

PATIENT SUMMARY

Miniaturised percutaneous nephrolithotomy represents a safe and effective alternative to standard techniques for the treatment of renal stones. Each patient needs to be considered individually and tailored surgical treatment has to be offered.

摘要

背景

为了降低经皮肾镜碎石术(PCNL)相关的发病率,一些研究人员逐渐引入了微创方法。微型肾镜的发展促进了这些技术的广泛传播,并使 PCNL 在腔内泌尿外科中的作用得到了显著扩展。

目的

讨论现代 PCNL 所包含的不同技术,并确定每种技术的优缺点。

证据获取

本综述的数据通过在 PubMed 上搜索获得,包括过去 20 年在核心临床期刊上发表的英文研究。搜索词包括“尿路结石”、“肾结石”或“尿石症”,与“微创 PCNL”、“mini-PCNL”、“micro-PCNL”、“微创 PCNL”和“ultra-mini PCNL”相结合。检索到与主题相关的出版物,并进行了批判性评价。

证据综合

微创 PCNL 的适应证尚未标准化。尽管文献中的数据显示存在局限性和相互矛盾的结果,但这些技术在治疗肾结石的有效性和安全性方面似乎很有前途。微型器械的发展促进了对手术中产生的吸尘器效应背后物理学的了解,以及钬激光发生器和外科医生技能的提高,导致微创技术适应证的不断扩大。需要进行精心设计、随机、多机构的研究,以便在考虑将这些微创技术作为常规 PCNL 的潜在替代方法之前,更好地了解这些微创技术的适应证。

结论

微创 PCNL 是现代腔内泌尿外科医生的一种有价值的新工具,与标准技术相比,它能提供更好的结果和更低的并发症发生率,与软性输尿管镜相比,具有更高的成本效益。

患者总结

微创经皮肾镜碎石术是治疗肾结石的一种安全有效的替代标准技术的方法。每个患者都需要个体化考虑,并提供定制的手术治疗。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验