a Department of Military and Emergency Medicine, Consortium for Health and Military Performance, F. Edward Hébert School of Medicine , Uniformed Services University of the Health Sciences , 4301 Jones Bridge Road, Bethesda , MD 20814 , USA.
Nutr Neurosci. 2019 Jan;22(1):19-28. doi: 10.1080/1028415X.2017.1349359. Epub 2017 Jul 19.
Differences in the composition of control diets may confound outcomes in studies investigating dietary effects.
We compared the effects of two control diets commonly used in mice studies, chow (SD) and a purified low-fat diet (LFD), in relation to a chronic high-fat diet (HFD). We hypothesized that SD and LFD will have similar effects on phenotypic, metabolic, and behavioral outcomes.
Fifty-four 5-week-old male C57BL/6J mice were randomly assigned to one of the three dietary interventions (SD, LFD, or HFD) for 18 weeks. At week 16, mice were tested for behavioral changes. Glucose tolerance testing was conducted at week 17 and terminal blood collection at week 18.
SD and LFD mice exhibited no differences in cognitive performance on the Y-maze test and comparable anxiety-like behavior in the open-field and elevated zero maze tests. Significant declines in cognitive function and greater anxiety-like behavior were observed in the HFD group compared to both SD and LFD. Areas under the glucose tolerance curve were similar for SD and LFD, as were levels of high-density lipoprotein, triglycerides, cytokines, and adipocytokines. Only total cholesterol was significantly higher in LFD mice compared to SD mice. All measures were significantly higher in the HFD group.
Our data demonstrate that young mice develop similar phenotypic, metabolic, and behavioral profiles when fed SD vs. LFD. The two diets may thus be equally appropriate as controls for an HFD, although some studies may want to consider differences in effects on cholesterol levels.
对照饮食的组成差异可能会混淆研究饮食影响的结果。
我们比较了两种常用于小鼠研究的对照饮食,即标准饮食(SD)和纯化低脂饮食(LFD),与慢性高脂肪饮食(HFD)的关系。我们假设 SD 和 LFD 对表型、代谢和行为结果的影响相似。
54 只 5 周龄雄性 C57BL/6J 小鼠被随机分配到三种饮食干预组(SD、LFD 或 HFD)中的一种,进行 18 周的干预。在第 16 周,对小鼠进行行为变化测试。在第 17 周进行葡萄糖耐量测试,并在第 18 周进行终末采血。
在 Y 迷宫测试中,SD 和 LFD 组的小鼠在认知表现上没有差异,在旷场和高架零迷宫测试中也表现出类似的焦虑样行为。与 SD 和 LFD 组相比,HFD 组的认知功能显著下降,焦虑样行为更明显。SD 和 LFD 的葡萄糖耐量曲线下面积相似,高密度脂蛋白、甘油三酯、细胞因子和脂肪细胞因子水平也相似。只有 LFD 组的总胆固醇水平显著高于 SD 组。所有指标在 HFD 组均显著升高。
我们的数据表明,年轻小鼠在喂食 SD 与 LFD 时会出现相似的表型、代谢和行为特征。因此,这两种饮食可能同样适合作为 HFD 的对照饮食,尽管一些研究可能需要考虑对胆固醇水平影响的差异。