Caprio Maria Grazia, Marr Karen, Gandhi Sirin, Jakimovski Dejan, Hagemeier Jesper, Weinstock-Guttman Bianca, Zivadinov Robert, Mancini Marcello
Institute of Biostructure and Bioimaging, National Research Council of Italy, Naples. Italy.
Department of Neurology, Buffalo Neuroimaging Analysis Center, Jacobs School of Medicine and Biomedical Sciences, University at Buffalo, State University of New York, Buffalo, NY. United States.
Curr Neurovasc Res. 2017;14(3):266-273. doi: 10.2174/1567202614666170718095203.
An impaired cerebrospinal venous drainage was postulated to be a cofactor in the multifactorial pathogenesis of multiple sclerosis (MS). Chronic cerebrospinal venous insufficiency (CCSVI) is characterized by abnormalities of the main extracranial cerebrospinal venous outflow routes, which can be detected by color Doppler Ultrasound (CDUS) using 5 venous hemodynamic (VH) criteria. Discrepant results between different investigators were reported in the past, therefore the usefulness and applicability of the CCSVI CDUS-based diagnosis in clinical research and practice has been questioned. The reproducibility of proposed criteria for CCSVI detection depends on the blinding, training level, skills of the operator and interpretation of VH criteria.
To assess agreement between centralized and local reading of CDUS examination for diagnosis of CCSVI in trained Doppler sonologists.
This study was performed in 78 MS patients and 28 age- and sex-matched healthy controls (HCs). Extracranial and transcranial CDUS venous hemodynamic assessment was conducted, according to International Society of Neurovascular Disease (ISNVD) recommended criteria, by a single CCSVI-trained expert sonologist blinded to the subject disease status. After the local Doppler sonologist performed the investigation, all images and video clips of the CDUS examination were sent to the centralized reading center, where a second blinded reading was performed by two CCSVI-trained expert sonologists. Statistical analyses were performed comparing accuracy of CCSVI diagnosis (≥2 VH criteria) and each of the 5 individual VH criteria using Cohen kappa statistic, along with positive/negative agreement and Odds ratio (OR) with 95% confidence intervals (95% CI).
Diagnosis of CCSVI was obtained in 59.7% of local and 64.3% centralized readers (Kappa, 0.67, p<0.001). Similar Kappa values were obtained for CCSVI diagnosis and individual CCSVI criteria in both MS patients and HCs. The highest Kappa between local and centralized readers was observed for VH criteria 5 (0.93) followed by VH criteria 4 (0.70), VH criteria 1 (0.66), VH criteria 2 (0.64) and VH criteria 3 (0.58). The positive predictive value (PPV) and negative predictive value (NPV) for CCSVI diagnosis were 82.7% and 86,7%, respectively with an OR of 31.1 (95% CI 11.1-87.5, p<0.001). The highest agreement between local and centralized readers was observed for VH criteria 4 (OR 98.7, 95% CI 17.1-569.9, p<0.001) with 72.7% PPV and 97.3% NPV followed by VH criteria 5 (53, 95% CI 13.4-209.2, p<0.001) with 98.1% PPV and 100% NPV value.
Centralized reading of the CDUS examination for the diagnosis of CCSVI is feasible with high accuracy in CCSVI-trained Doppler sonologists. The most reproducible VH criteria between local and centralized readers were VH criteria 4 and 5.
脑脊液静脉引流受损被认为是多发性硬化(MS)多因素发病机制中的一个辅助因素。慢性脑脊液静脉功能不全(CCSVI)的特征是颅外主要脑脊液静脉流出途径异常,可通过彩色多普勒超声(CDUS)使用5项静脉血流动力学(VH)标准进行检测。过去有不同研究者报告了不一致的结果,因此基于CDUS的CCSVI诊断在临床研究和实践中的实用性和适用性受到质疑。CCSVI检测标准的可重复性取决于操作者的盲法、培训水平、技能以及对VH标准的解读。
评估在训练有素的多普勒超声医师中,CDUS检查的集中解读与本地解读在诊断CCSVI方面的一致性。
本研究纳入了78例MS患者和28例年龄及性别匹配的健康对照(HCs)。由一名对受试者疾病状态不知情的经过CCSVI培训的专家超声医师,根据国际神经血管疾病学会(ISNVD)推荐的标准,对颅外和经颅CDUS静脉血流动力学进行评估。在本地多普勒超声医师完成检查后,将CDUS检查的所有图像和视频片段发送至集中解读中心,由两名经过CCSVI培训的专家超声医师进行第二次盲法解读。使用Cohen卡方统计量比较CCSVI诊断(≥2项VH标准)和5项个体VH标准各自的准确性,并计算阳性/阴性一致性以及95%置信区间(95%CI)的优势比(OR),进行统计分析。
本地解读中59.7%的读者以及集中解读中64.3%的读者诊断为CCSVI(卡方值为0.67,p<0.001)。在MS患者和HCs中,CCSVI诊断和个体CCSVI标准的卡方值相似。本地和集中解读读者之间卡方值最高的是VH标准5(0.93),其次是VH标准4(0.70)、VH标准1(0.66)、VH标准2(0.64)和VH标准3(0.58)。CCSVI诊断的阳性预测值(PPV)和阴性预测值(NPV)分别为82.7%和86.7%,OR为31.1(95%CI 11.1 - 87.5,p<0.001)。本地和集中解读读者之间一致性最高的是VH标准4(OR 98.7,95%CI 17.1 - 569.9,p<0.001),PPV为72.7%,NPV为97.3%,其次是VH标准5(53,95%CI 13.4 - 209.2,p<0.001),PPV为98.1%,NPV为100%。
对于经过CCSVI培训的多普勒超声医师,对CDUS检查进行集中解读以诊断CCSVI是可行的,且准确性较高。本地和集中解读读者之间最具可重复性的VH标准是VH标准4和5。