Montgomery Melissa M, Tritsch Amanda J, Cone John R, Schmitz Randy J, Henson Robert A, Shultz Sandra J
Center for Sport Performance, Department of Kinesiology, California State University, Fullerton.
University of South Florida, Tampa.
J Athl Train. 2017 Aug;52(8):738-746. doi: 10.4085/1062-6050-52.5.03. Epub 2017 Jul 19.
The extent to which lower extremity lean mass (LELM) relative to total body mass influences one's ability to maintain safe landing biomechanics during prolonged exercise when injury incidence increases is unknown.
To examine the influence of LELM on (1) pre-exercise lower extremity biomechanics and (2) changes in biomechanics during an intermittent exercise protocol (IEP) and (3) determine whether these relationships differ by sex. We hypothesized that less LELM would predict higher-risk baseline biomechanics and greater changes toward higher-risk biomechanics during the IEP.
Cohort study.
Controlled laboratory.
A total of 59 athletes (30 men: age = 20.3 ± 2.0 years, height = 1.79 ± 0.05 m, mass = 75.2 ± 7.2 kg; 29 women: age = 20.6 ± 2.3 years, height = 1.67 ± 0.08 m, mass = 61.8 ± 9.0 kg) participated.
INTERVENTION(S): Before completing an individualized 90-minute IEP designed to mimic a soccer match, participants underwent dual-energy x-ray absorptiometry testing for LELM.
MAIN OUTCOME MEASURE(S): Three-dimensional lower extremity biomechanics were measured during drop-jump landings before the IEP and every 15 minutes thereafter. A previously reported principal components analysis reduced 40 biomechanical variables to 11 factors. Hierarchical linear modeling analysis then determined the extent to which sex and LELM predicted the baseline score and the change in each factor over time.
Lower extremity lean mass did not influence baseline biomechanics or the changes over time. Sex influenced the biomechanical factor representing knee loading at baseline (P = .04) and the changes in the anterior cruciate ligament-loading factor over time (P = .03). The LELM had an additional influence only on women who possessed less LELM (P = .03 and .02, respectively).
Lower extremity lean mass influenced knee loading during landing in women but not in men. The effect appeared to be stronger in women with less LELM. Continually decreasing knee loading over time may reflect a strategy chosen to avoid injury. A minimal threshold of LELM may be needed to safely perform landing maneuvers, especially during prolonged exercise when the injury risk increases.
当损伤发生率增加时,相对于总体质量的下肢瘦体重(LELM)对一个人在长时间运动中维持安全着陆生物力学能力的影响程度尚不清楚。
研究LELM对(1)运动前下肢生物力学、(2)间歇性运动方案(IEP)期间生物力学变化的影响,以及(3)确定这些关系是否因性别而异。我们假设LELM越少,预测的基线生物力学风险越高,并且在IEP期间向高风险生物力学的变化越大。
队列研究。
受控实验室。
共有59名运动员(30名男性:年龄=20.3±2.0岁,身高=1.79±0.05米,体重=75.2±7.2千克;29名女性:年龄=20.6±2.3岁,身高=1.67±0.08米,体重=61.8±9.0千克)参与。
在完成旨在模拟足球比赛的个性化90分钟IEP之前,参与者接受双能X线吸收法检测LELM。
在IEP之前和之后每隔15分钟进行的下落跳着陆过程中测量三维下肢生物力学。先前报道的主成分分析将40个生物力学变量减少到11个因素。然后,分层线性模型分析确定性别和LELM预测基线分数以及每个因素随时间变化的程度。
下肢瘦体重不影响基线生物力学或随时间的变化。性别影响代表基线时膝关节负荷的生物力学因素(P = 0.04)以及前交叉韧带负荷因素随时间的变化(P = 0.03)。LELM仅对LELM较少的女性有额外影响(分别为P = 0.03和0.02)。
下肢瘦体重影响女性着陆时的膝关节负荷,但不影响男性。这种影响在LELM较少的女性中似乎更强。随着时间的推移持续降低膝关节负荷可能反映了为避免受伤而选择的一种策略。可能需要LELM的最小阈值来安全地进行着陆动作,尤其是在长时间运动且受伤风险增加时。