Van der Jagt Alexander P N, Craig Tony, Brewer Mark J, Pearson David G
University of Aberdeen, Aberdeen, United Kingdom.
The James Hutton Institute, Aberdeen, United Kingdom.
PLoS One. 2017 Jul 19;12(7):e0169997. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0169997. eCollection 2017.
Attention Restoration Theory (ART) states that built scenes place greater load on attentional resources than natural scenes. This is explained in terms of "hard" and "soft" fascination of built and natural scenes. Given a lack of direct empirical evidence for this assumption we propose that perceptual saliency of scene content can function as an empirically derived indicator of fascination. Saliency levels were established by measuring speed of scene category detection using a Go/No-Go detection paradigm. Experiment 1 shows that built scenes are more salient than natural scenes. Experiment 2 replicates these findings using greyscale images, ruling out a colour-based response strategy, and additionally shows that built objects in natural scenes affect saliency to a greater extent than the reverse. Experiment 3 demonstrates that the saliency of scene content is directly linked to cognitive restoration using an established restoration paradigm. Overall, these findings demonstrate an important link between the saliency of scene content and related cognitive restoration.
注意力恢复理论(ART)指出,人造场景比自然场景对注意力资源的负荷更大。这可以从人造场景和自然场景的“硬”吸引力和“软”吸引力方面来解释。鉴于缺乏这一假设的直接实证证据,我们提出场景内容的感知显著性可以作为一种基于实证得出的吸引力指标。通过使用“是/否”检测范式测量场景类别检测速度来确定显著性水平。实验1表明人造场景比自然场景更显著。实验2使用灰度图像重复了这些发现,排除了基于颜色的反应策略,此外还表明自然场景中的人造物体比相反情况对显著性的影响更大。实验3使用既定的恢复范式证明场景内容的显著性与认知恢复直接相关。总体而言,这些发现证明了场景内容的显著性与相关认知恢复之间的重要联系。