Kim Hongkeun
Department of Rehabilitation Psychology, Daegu University, 201, Daegudae-ro, Gyeongsan-si, Gyeongsangbuk-do, 38453, Republic of Korea.
Hum Brain Mapp. 2017 Apr;38(4):1894-1913. doi: 10.1002/hbm.23492. Epub 2016 Dec 23.
Repetition suppression and enhancement refer to the reduction and increase in the neural responses for repeated rather than novel stimuli, respectively. This study provides a meta-analysis of the effects of repetition suppression and enhancement, restricting the data used to that involving fMRI/PET, visual stimulus presentation, and healthy participants. The major findings were as follows. First, the global topography of the repetition suppression effects was strikingly similar to that of the "subsequent memory" effects, indicating that the mechanism for repetition suppression is the reduced engagement of an encoding system. The lateral frontal cortex effects involved the frontoparietal control network regions anteriorly and the dorsal attention network regions posteriorly. The left fusiform cortex effects predominantly involved the dorsal attention network regions, whereas the right fusiform cortex effects mainly involved the visual network regions. Second, the category-specific meta-analyses and their comparisons indicated that most parts of the alleged category-specific regions showed repetition suppression for more than one stimulus category. In this regard, these regions may not be "dedicated cortical modules," but are more likely parts of multiple overlapping large-scale maps of simple features. Finally, the global topography of the repetition enhancement effects was similar to that of the "retrieval success" effects, suggesting that the mechanism for repetition enhancement is voluntary or involuntary explicit retrieval during an implicit memory task. Taken together, these results clarify the network affiliations of the regions showing reliable repetition suppression and enhancement effects and contribute to the theoretical interpretations of the local and global topography of these two effects. Hum Brain Mapp 38:1894-1913, 2017. © 2017 Wiley Periodicals, Inc.
重复抑制和增强分别指的是对重复刺激而非新异刺激的神经反应的减少和增加。本研究对重复抑制和增强的效应进行了荟萃分析,将所使用的数据限制为涉及功能磁共振成像/正电子发射断层扫描、视觉刺激呈现以及健康参与者的数据。主要研究结果如下。首先,重复抑制效应的整体拓扑结构与“后续记忆”效应的拓扑结构惊人地相似,这表明重复抑制的机制是编码系统参与度的降低。额叶外侧皮质效应在前部涉及额顶叶控制网络区域,在后部涉及背侧注意网络区域。左侧梭状回皮质效应主要涉及背侧注意网络区域,而右侧梭状回皮质效应主要涉及视觉网络区域。其次,特定类别荟萃分析及其比较表明,所谓的特定类别区域的大部分对不止一种刺激类别表现出重复抑制。在这方面,这些区域可能不是“专用皮质模块”,而更有可能是简单特征的多个重叠大规模图谱的一部分。最后,重复增强效应的整体拓扑结构与“检索成功”效应的拓扑结构相似,这表明重复增强的机制是在隐性记忆任务期间的自愿或非自愿显性检索。综上所述,这些结果阐明了显示可靠重复抑制和增强效应的区域的网络归属,并有助于对这两种效应的局部和整体拓扑结构进行理论解释。《人类大脑图谱》38:1894 - 1913, 2017。© 2017威利期刊公司。