Zimmermann Marita R, Vodicka Elisabeth, Babigumira Joseph B, Okech Timothy, Mugo Nelly, Sakr Samah, Garrison Louis P, Chung Michael H
Department of Pharmacy, University of Washington, 1959 NE Pacific St., HSB H-375, Box 357630, Seattle, WA 98195 USA.
Department of Global Health, University of Washington, 325 Ninth Avenue, Box 359909, Seattle, WA 98104 USA.
Cost Eff Resour Alloc. 2017 Jul 14;15:13. doi: 10.1186/s12962-017-0075-6. eCollection 2017.
This study evaluated the potential cost-effectiveness of cervical cancer screening in HIV treatment clinics in Nairobi, Kenya.
A Markov model was used to project health outcomes and costs of cervical cancer screening and cryotherapy at an HIV clinic in Kenya using cryotherapy without screening, visual inspection with acetic acid (VIA), Papanicolaou smear (Pap), and testing for human papillomavirus (HPV). Direct and indirect medical and non-medical costs were examined from societal and clinic perspectives.
Costs of cryotherapy, VIA, Pap, and HPV for women with CD4 200-500 cells/mL were $99, $196, $219, and $223 from a societal perspective and $19, $94, $124, and $113 from a clinic perspective, with 17.3, 17.1, 17.1, and 17.1 years of life expectancy, respectively. Women at higher CD4 counts (>500 cells/mL) given cryotherapy VIA, Pap, and HPV resulted in better life expectancies (19.9+ years) and lower cost (societal: $49, $99, $115, and $102; clinic: $13, $51, $71, and $56). VIA was less expensive than HPV unless HPV screening could be reduced to a single visit.
Preventative cryotherapy was the least expensive strategy and resulted in highest projected life expectancy, while VIA was most cost-effective unless HPV could be reduced to a single visit.
本研究评估了肯尼亚内罗毕艾滋病治疗诊所开展宫颈癌筛查的潜在成本效益。
采用马尔可夫模型,对肯尼亚一家艾滋病诊所采用不筛查直接冷冻疗法、醋酸肉眼观察法(VIA)、巴氏涂片法(Pap)以及人乳头瘤病毒(HPV)检测法进行宫颈癌筛查和冷冻治疗的健康结果及成本进行预测。从社会和诊所角度审视了直接和间接的医疗及非医疗成本。
从社会角度看,CD4细胞计数为200 - 500个/毫升的女性接受冷冻治疗、VIA、Pap和HPV检测的成本分别为99美元、196美元、219美元和223美元,从诊所角度看分别为19美元、94美元、124美元和113美元,预期寿命分别为17.3年、17.1年、17.1年和17.1年。CD4细胞计数较高(>500个/毫升)的女性接受冷冻治疗、VIA、Pap和HPV检测,预期寿命更长(19.9年以上),成本更低(社会角度:49美元、99美元、115美元和102美元;诊所角度:13美元、51美元、71美元和56美元)。除非HPV筛查可减至单次就诊,否则VIA比HPV成本更低。
预防性冷冻治疗是成本最低的策略,预期寿命最长,而VIA最具成本效益,除非HPV筛查可减至单次就诊。