Gonzalez Corcia M Cecilia, Sieira Juan, Pappaert Gudrun, de Asmundis Carlo, Chierchia Gian Battista, Sarkozy Andrea, Brugada Pedro
Heart Rhythm Management Centre, UZ Brussels-VUB, Brussels, Belgium; Pediatric Cardiology Department, St Luc Hospital, Brussels, Belgium; Cardiology Department, University Hospital of Antwerp, Antwerp, Belgium.
Heart Rhythm Management Centre, UZ Brussels-VUB, Brussels, Belgium.
Am J Cardiol. 2017 Sep 1;120(5):797-802. doi: 10.1016/j.amjcard.2017.05.056. Epub 2017 Jun 15.
Risk stratification in Brugada syndrome in young patients remains challenging. We investigated the clinical characteristics, prognosis, and risk in young patients with the Brugada syndrome. We studied 95 patients with the Brugada syndrome aged ≤19 years. The median age at diagnosis was 12.9 years. The clinical presentation was sudden cardiac death in 7% and syncope in 21%. The remaining 72% were asymptomatic at diagnosis. Electrical abnormalities were present in 36%, including spontaneous type I electrocardiogram (12%), sinus node dysfunction (9%), atrioventricular block (17%), intraventricular conduction delay (16%), and atrial arrhythmias (8%). An electrophysiologic study was performed in 75%; ventricular arrhythmias were induced in 3%. An implantable cardioverter-defibrillator was placed in 25%. During a mean follow-up of 59 months, 9 patients presented with arrhythmic events (event rate: 1.9% per year). Variables significantly associated with events were: presentation with sudden cardiac death or syncope, spontaneous type I electrocardiogram, sinus node dysfunction and/or atrial tachycardia, conduction abnormality, and induction of ventricular arrhythmias during programmed ventricular stimulation. A model including the previous 4 main clinical variables (1, sudden cardiac death or syncope; 2, spontaneous type I electrocardiogram; 3, sinus node dysfunction and/or atrial tachycardia; and 4, conduction abnormality) had a high predictive power (C: 0.93) for the risk of lethal events. A score of ≥4 conferred a 5-year event probability of 30% that increased to 53% if the score was ≥6. In conclusion, our study validated a model to predict risk in young patients with the Brugada syndrome, which takes into account 4 clinical measures.
对年轻患者的 Brugada 综合征进行危险分层仍然具有挑战性。我们调查了年轻 Brugada 综合征患者的临床特征、预后及风险。我们研究了 95 例年龄≤19 岁的 Brugada 综合征患者。诊断时的中位年龄为 12.9 岁。临床表现为 7%的患者发生心源性猝死,21%的患者发生晕厥。其余 72%在诊断时无症状。36%的患者存在电异常,包括自发 I 型心电图(12%)、窦房结功能障碍(9%)、房室传导阻滞(17%)、室内传导延迟(16%)和房性心律失常(8%)。75%的患者进行了电生理检查;3%的患者诱发了室性心律失常。25%的患者植入了植入式心律转复除颤器。在平均 59 个月的随访期间,9 例患者出现心律失常事件(事件发生率:每年 1.9%)。与事件显著相关的变量包括:心源性猝死或晕厥表现、自发 I 型心电图、窦房结功能障碍和/或房性心动过速、传导异常以及程控心室刺激时诱发室性心律失常。一个包含前 4 个主要临床变量(1. 心源性猝死或晕厥;2. 自发 I 型心电图;3. 窦房结功能障碍和/或房性心动过速;4. 传导异常)的模型对致死性事件风险具有较高的预测能力(C:0.93)。评分≥4 时,5 年事件概率为 30%,若评分≥6,则增加至 53%。总之,我们的研究验证了一个预测年轻 Brugada 综合征患者风险的模型,该模型考虑了 4 项临床指标。