Muderedzi Jennifer T, Eide Arne H, Braathen Stine H, Stray-Pedersen Babill
Institute of Clinical Medicine, University of Oslo, Norway.
SINTEF Technology and Society, Norway.
Afr J Disabil. 2017 Apr 18;6:274. doi: 10.4102/ajod.v6i0.274. eCollection 2017.
While it is widely assumed that disability, poverty and health are closely linked, research falls short of fully understanding the link. One approach to analysing the links between disability and poverty is through the concept of structural violence, referring to social structures that contribute to the impoverishment of individuals or communities. These structures can be political, ecological, legal and economic, among others.
To explore structural violence and how it affects families of children with cerebral palsy among the Tonga ethnic group living in poor rural communities of Binga in Zimbabwe.
This is a longitudinal, qualitative and ethnographic study. Data were collected over a period of eight years from 2005 to 2013. Data collection techniques were in-depth interviews, participant observation and focus group discussions. Purposive sampling was used to recruit 53 informants.
Structural violence was noted through four themes: internal displacement and development, food and politics, water and sanitation, and social services. Poverty was noted in the form of unemployment, lack of education, healthcare, food and shelter. The concept of structural violence inflicted social suffering on the informants. Politics played a major role in activities such as food withdrawal, lack of water, development and allocation of local resources to 'the people of the city', leaving the informants struggling with care.
Political and economic forces have structured risks and created a situation of extreme human suffering. The capabilities approach brings out the challenges associated with cerebral palsy in the context of development challenges.
尽管人们普遍认为残疾、贫困和健康紧密相连,但研究仍未能完全理解这种联系。分析残疾与贫困之间联系的一种方法是通过结构性暴力的概念,即指那些导致个人或社区贫困的社会结构。这些结构包括政治、生态、法律和经济等方面。
探讨结构性暴力及其如何影响生活在津巴布韦宾加贫困农村社区的汤加族脑瘫儿童家庭。
这是一项纵向、定性的人种学研究。数据收集时间跨度为2005年至2013年的八年时间。数据收集技术包括深度访谈、参与观察和焦点小组讨论。采用目的抽样法招募了53名受访者。
结构性暴力通过四个主题得以体现:国内流离失所与发展、食物与政治、水与卫生设施以及社会服务。贫困表现为失业、缺乏教育、医疗保健、食物和住所。结构性暴力的概念给受访者带来了社会痛苦。政治在诸如食物短缺、缺水、发展以及将当地资源分配给“城里人”等活动中起了主要作用,使受访者在照顾孩子方面苦苦挣扎。
政治和经济力量构建了风险并造成了极端的人类苦难状况。能力方法揭示了在发展挑战背景下与脑瘫相关的种种难题。