• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

《芝加哥食管动力障碍分类:经验教训》

Chicago Classification of Esophageal Motility Disorders: Lessons Learned.

作者信息

Rohof W O A, Bredenoord A J

机构信息

Department of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Academic Medical Center, Meibergdreef 9, 1105, AZ, Amsterdam, the Netherlands.

出版信息

Curr Gastroenterol Rep. 2017 Aug;19(8):37. doi: 10.1007/s11894-017-0576-7.

DOI:10.1007/s11894-017-0576-7
PMID:28730503
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC5519653/
Abstract

PURPOSE OF REVIEW

High-resolution manometry (HRM) is increasingly performed worldwide, to study esophageal motility. The Chicago classification is subsequently applied to interpret the manometric findings and facilitate a diagnosis of esophageal motility disorders. This review will discuss new insights regarding the diagnosis and management using the Chicago classification.

RECENT FINDINGS

Recent studies have demonstrated that high-resolution manometry is superior to conventional manometry, and has a higher sensitivity to diagnose achalasia. Furthermore, the subclassification of achalasia as used in the Chicago classification has prognostic value and can be used to direct treatment. Diagnosis of esophageal spasm has been improved by using the distal latency as diagnostic criterion. Recently, criteria for minor disorders of peristalsis have been sharpened, leading to a lower rate of patients with abnormal results, thereby increasing the relevance of a diagnosis. High-resolution manometry is now considered the gold standard for diagnosis of esophageal motility disorders. The Chicago classification provides a standardized approach for analysis and categorization of abnormalities that has led to a significant increase in our knowledge regarding the diagnosis and management of motility disorders. Further refinement of the classification will be required.

摘要

综述目的

高分辨率测压法(HRM)在全球范围内越来越多地用于研究食管动力。随后应用芝加哥分类法来解释测压结果并有助于诊断食管动力障碍。本综述将讨论使用芝加哥分类法在诊断和管理方面的新见解。

最新发现

最近的研究表明,高分辨率测压法优于传统测压法,对诊断贲门失弛缓症具有更高的敏感性。此外,芝加哥分类法中使用的贲门失弛缓症亚分类具有预后价值,可用于指导治疗。通过将远端潜伏期用作诊断标准,食管痉挛的诊断得到了改善。最近,蠕动轻微障碍的标准得到了细化,导致结果异常的患者比例降低,从而提高了诊断的相关性。高分辨率测压法现在被认为是诊断食管动力障碍的金标准。芝加哥分类法为异常情况的分析和分类提供了一种标准化方法,这使得我们在动力障碍的诊断和管理方面的知识有了显著增加。还需要对该分类法进行进一步完善。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/fa31/5519653/bd6942158823/11894_2017_576_Fig2_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/fa31/5519653/86061496283d/11894_2017_576_Fig1_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/fa31/5519653/bd6942158823/11894_2017_576_Fig2_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/fa31/5519653/86061496283d/11894_2017_576_Fig1_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/fa31/5519653/bd6942158823/11894_2017_576_Fig2_HTML.jpg

相似文献

1
Chicago Classification of Esophageal Motility Disorders: Lessons Learned.《芝加哥食管动力障碍分类:经验教训》
Curr Gastroenterol Rep. 2017 Aug;19(8):37. doi: 10.1007/s11894-017-0576-7.
2
Esophageal motility disorders on high-resolution manometry: Chicago classification version 4.0.高分辨率食管动力障碍:芝加哥分类版本 4.0。
Neurogastroenterol Motil. 2021 Jan;33(1):e14058. doi: 10.1111/nmo.14058.
3
The Chicago Classification 3.0 Results in More Normal Findings and Fewer Hypotensive Findings With No Difference in Other Diagnoses.《芝加哥分类法》3.0 版带来了更多正常结果和更少低血压结果,其他诊断方面无差异。
Am J Gastroenterol. 2017 Apr;112(4):606-612. doi: 10.1038/ajg.2017.10. Epub 2017 Jan 31.
4
The Chicago Classification of esophageal motility disorders, v3.0.《芝加哥食管动力障碍分类,第3.0版》
Neurogastroenterol Motil. 2015 Feb;27(2):160-74. doi: 10.1111/nmo.12477. Epub 2014 Dec 3.
5
[High-resolution Manometry for Esophageal Motility Disorders].[用于食管动力障碍的高分辨率测压法]
Kyobu Geka. 2018 Sep;71(10):894-899.
6
Inter-observer agreement for diagnostic classification of esophageal motility disorders defined in high-resolution manometry.高分辨率测压法定义的食管动力障碍诊断分类的观察者间一致性。
Dis Esophagus. 2015 Nov-Dec;28(8):711-9. doi: 10.1111/dote.12278. Epub 2014 Sep 3.
7
Primary Esophageal Motility Disorders: Beyond Achalasia.原发性食管动力障碍:超越贲门失弛缓症
Int J Mol Sci. 2017 Jun 30;18(7):1399. doi: 10.3390/ijms18071399.
8
Changes in the Treatment of Primary Esophageal Motility Disorders Imposed by the New Classification for Esophageal Motility Disorders on High Resolution Manometry (Chicago Classification 4.0).高分辨率食管测压新分类(芝加哥分类 4.0)对原发性食管动力障碍治疗的影响。
Adv Ther. 2021 May;38(5):2017-2026. doi: 10.1007/s12325-021-01714-w. Epub 2021 Mar 27.
9
The Relevance of Spastic Esophageal Disorders as a Diagnostic Category.痉挛性食管疾病作为一种诊断类别之相关性
Curr Gastroenterol Rep. 2018 Aug 6;20(9):42. doi: 10.1007/s11894-018-0650-9.
10
Esophageal motility disorders.食管动力障碍
Surg Clin North Am. 2015 Jun;95(3):467-82. doi: 10.1016/j.suc.2015.02.003. Epub 2015 Apr 15.

引用本文的文献

1
Pre- and post-intervention oesophageal pressure topography metrics in the three subtypes of achalasia: A pilot study on Indian adults.贲门失弛缓症三种亚型干预前后的食管压力地形图指标:一项针对印度成年人的初步研究。
Med J Armed Forces India. 2024 Dec;80(Suppl 1):S210-S216. doi: 10.1016/j.mjafi.2023.07.006. Epub 2023 Oct 10.
2
Prospective Evaluation of Abelchia/RCPD Patients: Abnormalities in High-Resolution Esophageal Manometry.阿贝奇亚/反流性贲门失弛缓症患者的前瞻性评估:高分辨率食管测压异常
Laryngoscope. 2025 Feb;135(2):758-762. doi: 10.1002/lary.31811. Epub 2024 Oct 1.
3
A Comparison between Chicago Classification Versions 3.0 and 4.0 and Their Impact on Manometric Diagnoses in Esophageal High-Resolution Manometry Cases.

本文引用的文献

1
Peroral Endoscopic Myotomy for Type III Achalasia of Chicago Classification: Outcomes with a Minimum Follow-Up of 24 Months.经口内镜下肌切开术治疗芝加哥分类III型贲门失弛缓症:至少随访24个月的结果
J Gastrointest Surg. 2017 May;21(5):785-791. doi: 10.1007/s11605-017-3398-x. Epub 2017 Mar 17.
2
The Chicago Classification 3.0 Results in More Normal Findings and Fewer Hypotensive Findings With No Difference in Other Diagnoses.《芝加哥分类法》3.0 版带来了更多正常结果和更少低血压结果,其他诊断方面无差异。
Am J Gastroenterol. 2017 Apr;112(4):606-612. doi: 10.1038/ajg.2017.10. Epub 2017 Jan 31.
3
Is POEM the Answer for Management of Spastic Esophageal Disorders? A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.
芝加哥分类法3.0版与4.0版的比较及其对食管高分辨率测压病例测压诊断的影响
Diagnostics (Basel). 2024 Jan 25;14(3):263. doi: 10.3390/diagnostics14030263.
4
Threshold level of Peptest in diagnosing gastroesophageal reflux disease with extraesophageal symptoms: Evidence from Vietnam.Peptest在诊断伴有食管外症状的胃食管反流病中的阈值水平:来自越南的证据。
JGH Open. 2023 Nov 20;7(12):916-922. doi: 10.1002/jgh3.13002. eCollection 2023 Dec.
5
Oesophageal stasis is a risk factor for chronic lung allograft dysfunction and allograft failure in lung transplant recipients.食管淤滞是肺移植受者发生慢性肺移植功能障碍和移植失败的一个危险因素。
ERJ Open Res. 2023 Sep 10;9(5). doi: 10.1183/23120541.00222-2023. eCollection 2023 Sep.
6
Endoscopic impedance planimetry versus high-resolution manometry (HRM) for pre-operative motility evaluation in anti-reflux surgery.内镜阻抗平面测量术与高分辨率测压法在抗反流手术术前动力评估中的应用比较
Surg Endosc. 2024 Jan;38(1):377-383. doi: 10.1007/s00464-023-10418-x. Epub 2023 Oct 6.
7
Association of esophageal motility disorder symptoms with Chicago classification versions 3.0 and 4.0 using high-resolution esophageal manometry: A single-center experience from Saudi Arabia.采用高分辨率食管测压法评估食管动力障碍症状与芝加哥分类版本 3.0 和 4.0 的相关性:来自沙特阿拉伯的单中心经验。
Saudi J Gastroenterol. 2024 Mar 1;30(2):96-102. doi: 10.4103/sjg.sjg_243_23. Epub 2023 Aug 8.
8
Esophageal Manifestations of Dermatological Diseases, Diagnosis and Management.皮肤病的食管表现、诊断与管理
Curr Treat Options Gastroenterol. 2022 Dec;20(4):513-528. doi: 10.1007/s11938-022-00399-6. Epub 2022 Oct 18.
9
Three-dimensional laparoscopic approach to distal oesophageal diverticula: Single-centre experience.三维腹腔镜治疗食管远端憩室:单中心经验
J Minim Access Surg. 2023 Jan-Mar;19(1):120-129. doi: 10.4103/jmas.jmas_185_22.
10
Prevalence of Different Types of Primary Esophageal Motility Disorders and Their Associated Factors in Patients Referring to Shariati Hospital during 2018-2019.2018 - 2019年转诊至沙里亚蒂医院的患者中不同类型原发性食管动力障碍的患病率及其相关因素
Middle East J Dig Dis. 2022 Jan;14(1):70-76. doi: 10.34172/mejdd.2022.258. Epub 2022 Jan 30.
经口内镜下肌切开术是痉挛性食管疾病管理的答案吗?一项系统评价和荟萃分析。
Dig Dis Sci. 2017 Jan;62(1):35-44. doi: 10.1007/s10620-016-4373-1. Epub 2016 Nov 17.
4
Jackhammer esophagus: Observations on a European cohort.风钻样食管:欧洲队列研究观察
Neurogastroenterol Motil. 2017 Apr;29(4). doi: 10.1111/nmo.12975. Epub 2016 Oct 17.
5
Esophageal Motor Abnormalities in Patients With Scleroderma: Heterogeneity, Risk Factors, and Effects on Quality of Life.硬皮病患者的食管运动异常:异质性、危险因素和对生活质量的影响。
Clin Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2017 Feb;15(2):207-213.e1. doi: 10.1016/j.cgh.2016.08.034. Epub 2016 Sep 6.
6
Loss of Peristaltic Reserve, Determined by Multiple Rapid Swallows, Is the Most Frequent Esophageal Motility Abnormality in Patients With Systemic Sclerosis.通过多次快速吞咽测定的蠕动储备丧失是系统性硬化症患者中最常见的食管动力异常。
Clin Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2016 Oct;14(10):1502-6. doi: 10.1016/j.cgh.2016.03.039. Epub 2016 Apr 5.
7
High-Resolution Manometry Improves the Diagnosis of Esophageal Motility Disorders in Patients With Dysphagia: A Randomized Multicenter Study.高分辨率测压法提高吞咽困难患者食管动力障碍的诊断率:一项随机多中心研究。
Am J Gastroenterol. 2016 Mar;111(3):372-80. doi: 10.1038/ajg.2016.1. Epub 2016 Feb 2.
8
Distal esophageal spasm and the Chicago classification: is timing everything?食管远端痉挛与芝加哥分类:时机决定一切吗?
Neurogastroenterol Motil. 2016 Feb;28(2):260-5. doi: 10.1111/nmo.12721. Epub 2015 Nov 10.
9
Characterization and follow-up of esophagogastric junction outflow obstruction detected by high resolution manometry.高分辨率测压法检测食管胃交界部流出道梗阻的特征及随访
Neurogastroenterol Motil. 2016 Jan;28(1):116-26. doi: 10.1111/nmo.12708. Epub 2015 Oct 30.
10
Characterization of idiopathic esophagogastric junction outflow obstruction.特发性食管胃交界部流出道梗阻的特征
Neurogastroenterol Motil. 2015 Sep;27(9):1310-6. doi: 10.1111/nmo.12625. Epub 2015 Jun 21.