Suppr超能文献

左心室辅助装置的长期使用:临床结果报告。

Long-term use of left ventricular assist devices: a report on clinical outcomes.

作者信息

Raju Sneha, MacIver Jane, Foroutan Farid, Alba Carolina, Billia Filio, Rao Vivek

机构信息

From the Faculty of Medicine, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ont. (Raju), and the Advanced Heart Failure Program, Peter Munk Cardiac Centre, Toronto General Hospital, University Health Network, Toronto, Ont. (Raju, Maclver, Foroutan, Alba, Billia, Rao).

出版信息

Can J Surg. 2017 Aug;60(4):236-246. doi: 10.1503/cjs.010016.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

The literature examining clinical outcomes and readmissions during extended (> 1 yr) left ventricular assist device (LVAD) support is scarce, particularly in the era of continuous-flow LVADs.

METHODS

We completed a retrospective cohort study on consecutive LVAD patients from June 2006 to March 2015, focusing on those who received more than 1 year of total LVAD support time. Demographic characteristics, clinical outcomes and readmissions were analyzed using standard statistical methods. All readmissions were categorized as per the Interagency Registry for Mechanically Assisted Circulatory Support 2015 guidelines.

RESULTS

Of the 103 patients who received LVADs during the study period, 37 received LVAD support for more than 1 year, with 18 receiving support for more than 2 years. Average support time was 786 ± 381 days, with total support time reaching 80 patient-years. During a median follow-up of 2 years, 27 patients died, with 1-year conditional survival of 74%. Median freedom from first readmission was 106 days (range 1-603 d), with an average length of stay of 6 days. Readmissions resulted in an average of 41 ± 76 days in hospital per patient. Reasons for readmission were major infection (24%), major bleeding (19%) and device malfunction/thrombus (13%). There were a total of 112 procedures completed during the readmissions, with 60% of procedures being done in 13% ( = 5) of patients.

CONCLUSION

Continuous-flow LVADs provide excellent long-term survival. The present study describes marked differences in reasons for readmissions between the general LVAD population and those supported for more than 1 year. Prolonged LVAD support resulted in decreased susceptibility to major bleeds and increased susceptibility to infection.

摘要

背景

关于长期(>1年)左心室辅助装置(LVAD)支持期间临床结局和再入院情况的文献较少,尤其是在连续流LVAD时代。

方法

我们对2006年6月至2015年3月期间连续的LVAD患者进行了一项回顾性队列研究,重点关注那些接受LVAD总支持时间超过1年的患者。使用标准统计方法分析人口统计学特征、临床结局和再入院情况。所有再入院情况均按照2015年机构间机械辅助循环支持注册指南进行分类。

结果

在研究期间接受LVAD的103例患者中,37例接受LVAD支持超过1年,18例接受支持超过2年。平均支持时间为786±381天,总支持时间达80患者年。在中位随访2年期间,27例患者死亡,1年条件生存率为74%。首次再入院的中位无事件生存期为106天(范围1 - 603天),平均住院时间为6天。再入院导致每位患者平均住院41±76天。再入院原因包括严重感染(24%)、严重出血(19%)和装置故障/血栓形成(13%)。再入院期间共完成112例手术,60%的手术由13%( = 5)的患者完成。

结论

连续流LVAD提供了出色的长期生存。本研究描述了一般LVAD人群与接受支持超过1年的人群在再入院原因上的显著差异。延长LVAD支持导致对严重出血的易感性降低,对感染的易感性增加。

相似文献

1
Long-term use of left ventricular assist devices: a report on clinical outcomes.
Can J Surg. 2017 Aug;60(4):236-246. doi: 10.1503/cjs.010016.
2
Present-Day Hospital Readmissions after Left Ventricular Assist Device Implantation: A Large Single-Center Study.
Tex Heart Inst J. 2015 Oct 1;42(5):419-29. doi: 10.14503/THIJ-14-4971. eCollection 2015 Oct.
3
Left ventricular assist device exchange: the Toronto General Hospital experience.
Can J Surg. 2017 Aug;60(4):253-259. doi: 10.1503/cjs.011316.
4
Readmissions after continuous flow left ventricular assist device implantation.
J Artif Organs. 2017 Dec;20(4):311-317. doi: 10.1007/s10047-017-0975-4. Epub 2017 Jul 27.
6
Hospital Readmissions After Continuous-Flow Left Ventricular Assist Device Implantation: Incidence, Causes, and Cost Analysis.
Ann Thorac Surg. 2015 Sep;100(3):884-9. doi: 10.1016/j.athoracsur.2015.03.010. Epub 2015 Jun 19.
7
Factors determining post-operative readmissions after left ventricular assist device implantation.
J Heart Lung Transplant. 2014 Oct;33(10):1041-7. doi: 10.1016/j.healun.2014.05.009. Epub 2014 Jun 4.
9
Outcomes and Predictors of Readmissions with GI Bleeding in Patients with Left Ventricular Assist Devices.
South Med J. 2018 Nov;111(11):666-673. doi: 10.14423/SMJ.0000000000000883.
10
Use of left ventricular assist device (HeartMate II): a Singapore experience.
Artif Organs. 2014 Jul;38(7):543-8. doi: 10.1111/aor.12247. Epub 2014 Jan 7.

引用本文的文献

1
Transition to Advanced Heart Failure: From Identification to Improving Prognosis.
J Cardiovasc Dev Dis. 2025 Mar 17;12(3):104. doi: 10.3390/jcdd12030104.
2
The analysis of unplanned readmissions after left ventricular assist device implantation as bridge-to-transplant.
Turk Gogus Kalp Damar Cerrahisi Derg. 2020 Jan 23;28(1):55-62. doi: 10.5606/tgkdc.dergisi.2020.18836. eCollection 2020 Jan.

本文引用的文献

1
Hospital Readmissions After Continuous-Flow Left Ventricular Assist Device Implantation: Incidence, Causes, and Cost Analysis.
Ann Thorac Surg. 2015 Sep;100(3):884-9. doi: 10.1016/j.athoracsur.2015.03.010. Epub 2015 Jun 19.
2
Long-term outcome of patients on continuous-flow left ventricular assist device support.
J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg. 2014 Oct;148(4):1606-14. doi: 10.1016/j.jtcvs.2014.04.009. Epub 2014 Apr 12.
4
Factors determining post-operative readmissions after left ventricular assist device implantation.
J Heart Lung Transplant. 2014 Oct;33(10):1041-7. doi: 10.1016/j.healun.2014.05.009. Epub 2014 Jun 4.
5
Sixth INTERMACS annual report: a 10,000-patient database.
J Heart Lung Transplant. 2014 Jun;33(6):555-64. doi: 10.1016/j.healun.2014.04.010. Epub 2014 Apr 21.
7
9
Heart transplantation and left ventricular assist device therapy: two comparable options in end-stage heart failure?
Clin Cardiol. 2013 Jul;36(7):378-82. doi: 10.1002/clc.22124. Epub 2013 Apr 17.
10
Readmissions after ventricular assist device: etiologies, patterns, and days out of hospital.
Ann Thorac Surg. 2013 Apr;95(4):1276-81. doi: 10.1016/j.athoracsur.2012.12.039. Epub 2013 Mar 5.

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验