Joshi Pradeep, Yadav Rakesh, Dangi Amit, Kumar Pavan, Kumar Saket, Gupta Vivek, Gupta Vishal, Chandra Abhijit
Department of Surgical Gastroenterology, King George's Medical University, Lucknow, Uttar Pradesh, 226003, India.
Department of Human Organ Transplant, King George's Medical University, Lucknow, Uttar Pradesh, 226003, India.
Dysphagia. 2020 Aug;35(4):558-567. doi: 10.1007/s00455-019-10058-1. Epub 2019 Sep 4.
Endoscopic dilatation is the recommended primary therapy for chronic corrosive esophageal strictures (ES), and surgery is reserved for failed dilatation. Through this study, we intend to analyze the efficacy and long-term outcomes of both endoscopic and surgical interventions in corrosive ES. A retrospective cohort analysis of patients with chronic corrosive ES, managed with endoscopic or surgical procedures at a tertiary teaching institute in North India from December 2009 to December 2016, was performed from a prospectively maintained database. The primary outcome measure was the absence of dysphagia following dilatation or surgery. During the study period, 64 patients with ES underwent surgical or endoscopic treatment. Associated gastric strictures and pharyngeal strictures were present in 39 (60%) and 22 patients (28.9%), respectively. The mean age was 28.8 years and mean BMI was 14.2 kg/m. Acid was the most common corrosive substance. Endoscopic dilatation using Savary-Gilliard (SG) dilators was successful in achieving persistent symptom relief in 46 patients (71.8%) after a total of 358 sessions (mean number of dilatations were 5.2 ± 1.2) of dilatations over 2 years. The dilatation therapy failed in 18 patients (28.1%) including technical failures (15.6%), perforations (3.1%), refractory stricture (1.5%) and recurrent strictures (7.8%). Increasing stricture length (more than 6 cm) was associated with poor outcome of endoscopic dilatation (p < 0.001). Only eleven patients (17%) required esophageal replacement (resection: 0, bypass: 11) for failed dilatations including seven gastric pull-ups and four pharyngo-coloplasty. The stricture rate after surgery was 36.3% (4/11). The median follows up was 32 months. Endoscopic dilatation of corrosive ES is safe and effective therapy and should be the first-line therapy for these patients and surgery should be considered only in patients who have unsuccessful outcome following dilatation therapy.
内镜扩张术是慢性腐蚀性食管狭窄(ES)的推荐初始治疗方法,手术仅用于扩张治疗失败的情况。通过本研究,我们旨在分析内镜和手术干预治疗腐蚀性ES的疗效及长期结果。对2009年12月至2016年12月在印度北部一家三级教学机构接受内镜或手术治疗的慢性腐蚀性ES患者进行回顾性队列分析,数据来源于前瞻性维护的数据库。主要结局指标是扩张或手术后无吞咽困难。在研究期间,64例ES患者接受了手术或内镜治疗。分别有39例(60%)和22例(28.9%)患者合并胃狭窄和咽狭窄。平均年龄为28.8岁,平均体重指数为14.2kg/m。酸是最常见的腐蚀性物质。使用Savary-Gilliard(SG)扩张器进行内镜扩张,在2年共358次(平均扩张次数为5.2±1.2次)扩张后,46例患者(71.8%)成功实现了症状持续缓解。18例患者(28.1%)扩张治疗失败,包括技术失败(15.6%)、穿孔(3.1%)、难治性狭窄(1.5%)和复发性狭窄(7.8%)。狭窄长度增加(超过6cm)与内镜扩张效果不佳相关(p<0.001)。仅11例患者(17%)因扩张失败需要进行食管置换(切除:0例,旁路:11例),包括7例胃上提术和4例咽结肠成形术。手术后狭窄率为36.3%(4/11)。中位随访时间为32个月。腐蚀性ES的内镜扩张是一种安全有效的治疗方法,应作为这些患者的一线治疗,仅在扩张治疗失败的患者中考虑手术治疗。