Department of Surgery, Washington University in St. Louis School of Medicine, 660 South Euclid Ave, Campus Box 8109, St. Louis, MO, 63110, USA.
Department of Mechanical Engineering and Materials Science, Washington University in St. Louis, St. Louis, MO, USA.
Surg Endosc. 2018 Feb;32(2):820-830. doi: 10.1007/s00464-017-5749-9. Epub 2017 Jul 21.
Hernia meshes exhibit variability in mechanical properties, and their mechanical match to tissue has not been comprehensively studied. We used an innovative imaging model of in vivo strain tracking and ex vivo mechanical analysis to assess effects of mesh properties on repaired abdominal walls in a porcine model. We hypothesized that meshes with dissimilar mechanical properties compared to native tissue would alter abdominal wall mechanics more than better-matched meshes.
Seven mini-pigs underwent ventral hernia creation and subsequent open repair with one of two heavyweight polypropylene meshes. Following mesh implantation with attached radio-opaque beads, fluoroscopic images were taken at insufflation pressures from 5 to 30 mmHg on postoperative days 0, 7, and 28. At 28 days, animals were euthanized and ex vivo mechanical testing performed on full-thickness samples across repaired abdominal walls. Testing was conducted on 13 mini-pig controls, and on meshes separately. Stiffness and anisotropy (the ratio of stiffness in the transverse versus craniocaudal directions) were assessed.
3D reconstructions of repaired abdominal walls showed stretch patterns. As pressure increased, both meshes expanded, with no differences between groups. Over time, meshes contracted 17.65% (Mesh A) and 0.12% (Mesh B; p = 0.06). Mesh mechanics showed that Mesh A deviated from anisotropic native tissue more than Mesh B. Compared to native tissue, Mesh A was stiffer both transversely and craniocaudally. Explanted repaired abdominal walls of both treatment groups were stiffer than native tissue. Repaired tissue became less anisotropic over time, as mesh properties prevailed over native abdominal wall properties.
This technique assessed 3D stretch at the mesh level in vivo in a porcine model. While the abdominal wall expanded, mesh-ingrown areas contracted, potentially indicating stresses at mesh edges. Ex vivo mechanics demonstrate that repaired tissue adopts mesh properties, suggesting that a better-matched mesh could reduce changes to abdominal wall mechanics.
疝补片的机械性能存在差异,但其与组织的力学匹配尚未得到全面研究。我们使用一种创新的体内应变跟踪成像模型和体外力学分析来评估猪模型中补片特性对修复腹壁的影响。我们假设与固有组织相比,机械性能不同的补片会比匹配更好的补片更能改变腹壁力学。
7 只小型猪行腹疝造口术,并随后用两种重质聚丙烯补片之一行开放式修补。在补片植入附有放射性不透射线珠后,在术后第 0、7 和 28 天,在 5 至 30mmHg 的充气压力下进行透视成像。在第 28 天,处死动物并对修复后的整个腹壁进行离体力学测试。对 13 只小型猪对照和单独的补片进行了测试。评估了硬度和各向异性(在横切和颅尾方向的硬度比)。
修复腹壁的 3D 重建显示出拉伸模式。随着压力的增加,两种补片都有扩张,两组之间没有差异。随着时间的推移,补片分别收缩 17.65%(补片 A)和 0.12%(补片 B;p=0.06)。补片力学表明,补片 A 比补片 B 更偏离各向异性固有组织。与固有组织相比,补片 A 在横切和颅尾方向都更硬。与固有组织相比,两个治疗组的修复组织在植入后更硬。随着时间的推移,修复组织的各向异性降低,因为补片特性占主导地位,而固有腹壁特性降低。
这项技术评估了猪模型中体内补片水平的 3D 拉伸。虽然腹壁扩张,但补片内生长区域收缩,这可能表明补片边缘有应力。离体力学表明,修复组织采用补片特性,这表明匹配更好的补片可以减少对腹壁力学的改变。