Deeken Corey R, Lake Spencer P
Covalent Bio, LLC, St. Louis, MO, USA.
Department of Mechanical Engineering & Materials Science, Washington University in St. Louis, MO, USA.
J Mech Behav Biomed Mater. 2017 Oct;74:411-427. doi: 10.1016/j.jmbbm.2017.05.008. Epub 2017 May 6.
Abdominal wall hernias are one of the most common and long-standing surgical applications for biomaterials engineering. Yet, despite over 50 years of standard use of hernia repair materials, revision surgery is still required in nearly one third of patients due to hernia recurrence. To date, hernia mesh designs have focused on maximizing tensile strength to prevent structural failure of the implant. However, most recurrences occur at the biomaterial-tissue interface. There is a fundamental gap in understanding the degree to which a mechanical mismatch between hernia repair materials and host tissue contributes to failure at this interface. This review summarizes the current literature related to the anatomy and mechanics of both human and animal abdominal wall tissues, as well as the mechanical properties of many commonly-utilized hernia repair materials. The studies reviewed here reported greater compliance of the linea alba, larger strains for the intact abdominal wall, and greater stiffness for the rectus sheath and umbilical fascia when the tissues were loaded in the longitudinal direction compared to transverse. Additionally, greater stresses were observed in the linea alba when loaded in the transverse direction compared to longitudinal. Given these trends, a few recommendations can be made regarding orientation of mesh. The most compliant axis of the biomaterial should be oriented in the cranio-caudal (longitudinal) direction, and the strongest axis of the biomaterial should be oriented in the medial-lateral (transverse) direction. The human abdominal wall is also anisotropic, with anisotropy ratios as high as 8-9 reported for the human linea alba. Current biomaterial designs exhibit anisotropy ratios in the range of 1-3, and it is unclear whether an ideal ratio exists for optimal match between mesh and tissue. This is likely dependent on implantation location as the linea alba, rectus sheath, and other tissues of the abdominal wall exhibit different characteristics. Given the number of unknowns yet to be addressed by studies of the human abdominal wall, it is unlikely that any single biomaterial design currently encompasses all of the ideal features identified. More data on the mechanical properties of the abdominal wall will be needed to establish a full set of guidelines for ideal mesh mechanics including strength, compliance, anisotropy, nonlinearity and hysteresis.
腹壁疝是生物材料工程中最常见且长期存在的外科应用之一。然而,尽管疝修补材料已标准使用了50多年,但由于疝复发,仍有近三分之一的患者需要进行翻修手术。迄今为止,疝修补网片的设计主要集中在最大化拉伸强度以防止植入物的结构失效。然而,大多数复发发生在生物材料与组织的界面处。在理解疝修补材料与宿主组织之间的机械不匹配在多大程度上导致该界面处的失效方面,存在着根本性的差距。本综述总结了当前与人类和动物腹壁组织的解剖学和力学以及许多常用疝修补材料的力学性能相关的文献。这里回顾的研究报告称,白线的顺应性更高,完整腹壁的应变更大,并且当组织沿纵向加载时,腹直肌鞘和脐筋膜在纵向加载时比横向加载时更硬。此外,与纵向加载相比,白线在横向加载时观察到更大的应力。鉴于这些趋势,可以就网片的方向提出一些建议。生物材料最顺应的轴应沿头-尾(纵向)方向定向,生物材料最强的轴应沿内侧-外侧(横向)方向定向。人类腹壁也是各向异性的,据报道人类白线的各向异性比率高达8-9。目前的生物材料设计表现出1-3范围内的各向异性比率,并且尚不清楚是否存在理想比率以实现网片与组织之间的最佳匹配。这可能取决于植入位置,因为白线、腹直肌鞘和腹壁的其他组织表现出不同的特征。鉴于人类腹壁研究仍有待解决的未知因素数量众多,目前不太可能有任何单一的生物材料设计包含所有已确定的理想特征。需要更多关于腹壁力学性能的数据来建立一套完整的理想网片力学指南,包括强度、顺应性、各向异性、非线性和滞后性。