Est Savannah, Roen Madeleine, Chi Tingying, Simien Adrian, Castile Ryan M, Thompson Dominic M, Blatnik Jeffrey A, Deeken Corey R, Lake Spencer P
Department of Surgery, Section of Minimally Invasive Surgery, Washington University in St. Louis, 660 South Euclid Ave., St. Louis, MO 63110, USA.
Department of Mechanical Engineering & Materials Science, Washington University in St. Louis, 1 Brookings Drive, St. Louis, MO 63130, USA.
J Mech Behav Biomed Mater. 2017 Jul;71:43-53. doi: 10.1016/j.jmbbm.2017.02.009. Epub 2017 Feb 9.
Hernias remain one of the most common ailments to affect men and women worldwide. Surgical mesh materials were first used to reinforce hernia defects during surgery in the late 1950s (Laker, n.d.). Today, there are well over 50 prosthetic meshes available for hernia repair (Brown and Finch, 2010; Bryan et al., 2014; Hope and El-hayek, 2014). With the multitude of available options, surgeons are faced with the challenging task of optimizing mesh selection for each patient. If the mechanics of the mesh are not compatible with the surrounding tissue, mismatch can occur, which can lead to complications such as mesh failure and/or hernia recurrence. Unfortunately, many aspects of synthetic mesh mechanics remain poorly described. Therefore, the purpose of this study was to provide a more complete mechanical analysis of a variety of commercially available prosthetic meshes for hernia repair, including evaluation of meshes in a variety of orientations. Twenty different meshes were subjected to biaxial tensile tests at both 90° and 45° orientations, and results were analyzed for relative strength, strain behavior, and anisotropy. Peak tension and strain values varied dramatically across all mesh types for all directions, ranging between 4.08 and 25.74N/cm and -5% to 10% strain. Anisotropy ratios for the evaluated meshes ranged from 0.33 to 1.89, demonstrating a wide range in relative direction-dependence of mesh mechanics. While further study of prosthetic meshes and better characterization of properties of the human abdominal wall are needed, results of this study provide valuable data that may aid clinicians in optimizing mesh selection for specific patients and repair conditions.
疝气仍然是全球影响男性和女性的最常见疾病之一。20世纪50年代末,手术用网状材料首次用于在手术中加强疝气缺损处(莱克,无日期)。如今,有超过50种人工合成网片可用于疝气修补(布朗和芬奇,2010年;布莱恩等人,2014年;霍普和埃尔 - 哈耶克,2014年)。面对众多可用选项,外科医生面临着为每位患者优化网片选择这一具有挑战性的任务。如果网片的力学性能与周围组织不兼容,就可能出现不匹配,进而导致诸如网片失效和/或疝气复发等并发症。不幸的是,合成网片力学的许多方面仍描述甚少。因此,本研究的目的是对多种用于疝气修补的市售人工合成网片进行更全面的力学分析,包括评估不同方向的网片。对20种不同的网片在90°和45°方向上进行双轴拉伸试验,并分析结果的相对强度、应变行为和各向异性。所有网片类型在所有方向上的峰值张力和应变值差异极大,范围在4.08至25.74N/cm以及 -5%至10%应变之间。所评估网片的各向异性比率在0.33至1.89之间,表明网片力学在相对方向依赖性方面存在很大差异。虽然需要对人工合成网片进行进一步研究以及更好地描述人体腹壁的特性,但本研究结果提供了有价值的数据,可能有助于临床医生为特定患者和修补情况优化网片选择。