• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

相似文献

1
Post-war prevention: Emerging frameworks to prevent drug use after the War on Drugs.战后预防:毒品战争后的新兴框架预防药物滥用。
Int J Drug Policy. 2018 Jan;51:160-164. doi: 10.1016/j.drugpo.2017.06.012. Epub 2017 Jul 19.
2
A Smarter War on Drugs.一场更明智的禁毒战争。
JAMA. 2018 Dec 11;320(22):2301-2302. doi: 10.1001/jama.2018.18397.
3
Pain medicine and drug law enforcement: an important step toward balance.疼痛医学与药品执法:迈向平衡的重要一步。
J Pain Palliat Care Pharmacother. 2005;19(1):3-5.
4
The deterrent effects of Australian street-level drug law enforcement on illicit drug offending at outdoor music festivals.澳大利亚街头毒品执法对户外音乐节非法毒品犯罪的威慑作用。
Int J Drug Policy. 2017 Mar;41:91-100. doi: 10.1016/j.drugpo.2016.12.018. Epub 2017 Jan 26.
5
Drug policy and the public good: evidence for effective interventions.药物政策与公共利益:有效干预措施的证据。
Lancet. 2012 Jan 7;379(9810):71-83. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(11)61674-7.
6
Evidence-based drug policy: it starts with good evidence and ends with policy reform.循证药物政策:始于可靠证据,终于政策改革。
Int J Drug Policy. 2012 Nov;23(6):423-5. doi: 10.1016/j.drugpo.2012.10.005.
7
"War on drugs" continues in United States under new leadership.在美国新领导层的带领下,“毒品战争”仍在继续。
BMJ. 1993 Aug 7;307(6900):369-71. doi: 10.1136/bmj.307.6900.369.
8
On the threshold: how relevant should quantity be in determining intent to supply?处于临界状态:在确定供应意图时,数量应具有多大的相关性?
Int J Drug Policy. 2008 Dec;19(6):479-85. doi: 10.1016/j.drugpo.2007.08.003. Epub 2007 Sep 21.
9
The international drug control cooperation policy of the European Community: a personal view.欧洲共同体的国际药物管制合作政策:个人观点。
Bull Narc. 1994;46(2):1-7.
10
Using the Advocacy Coalition Framework and Multiple Streams policy theories to examine the role of evidence, research and other types of knowledge in drug policy.运用倡导联盟框架和多源流政策理论,考察证据、研究和其他类型的知识在毒品政策中的作用。
Addiction. 2018 Aug;113(8):1539-1547. doi: 10.1111/add.14197. Epub 2018 Apr 17.

引用本文的文献

1
'This is PEEP' participatory qualitative study: learning from a provincial consultation and advisory group of people with lived and living experience of substance use in British Columbia, Canada.这是一项关于 PEEP 的参与式定性研究:从加拿大不列颠哥伦比亚省有过或正在经历物质使用问题的人组成的省级咨询和顾问小组中学习。
BMJ Open. 2024 Nov 7;14(11):e085183. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2024-085183.
2
The feasibility and acceptability of an inoculative intervention video for gambling advertising: a focus group study of academics and experts-by-experience.赌博广告接种式干预视频的可行性与可接受性:一项针对学者和经验专家的焦点小组研究
J Public Health (Oxf). 2024 Dec 1;46(4):e654-e662. doi: 10.1093/pubmed/fdae167.
3
Gender and the first-time provision of injection initiation assistance among people who inject drugs across two distinct North American contexts: Tijuana, Mexico and Vancouver, Canada.在两个不同的北美背景下,即墨西哥提华纳和加拿大温哥华,注射吸毒者初次接受注射启动援助时的性别差异。
Drug Alcohol Rev. 2022 Mar;41(3):686-696. doi: 10.1111/dar.13390. Epub 2021 Oct 11.
4
Examining the gender composition of drug injecting initiation events: A mixed methods investigation of three North American contexts.考察药物注射起始事件的性别构成:对三个北美背景的混合方法调查。
Int J Drug Policy. 2021 Apr;90:103056. doi: 10.1016/j.drugpo.2020.103056. Epub 2020 Dec 11.
5
Behavioral health policy for improving population health and wellbeing: opportunities for investment in evidence-based policymaking.改善人口健康和福祉的行为健康政策:基于证据的决策制定投资机会。
Transl Behav Med. 2020 Aug 7;10(3):590-597. doi: 10.1093/tbm/ibz173.
6
Editorial: Behavior Science for the Public Welfare.社论:为公共福利的行为科学。
Perspect Behav Sci. 2019 Aug 27;42(3):365-374. doi: 10.1007/s40614-019-00222-1. eCollection 2019 Sep.
7
Assessing factors associated with discharge from opioid agonist therapy due to incarceration in the United States.评估与美国因监禁而终止阿片类激动剂治疗相关的因素。
J Addict Dis. 2020 Jan-Mar;38(1):1-18. doi: 10.1080/10550887.2019.1690365. Epub 2019 Dec 10.
8
Policing space in the overdose crisis: A rapid ethnographic study of the impact of law enforcement practices on the effectiveness of overdose prevention sites.在药物过量危机中维持秩序:执法实践对过量预防场所效力的影响的快速人种学研究。
Int J Drug Policy. 2019 Nov;73:199-207. doi: 10.1016/j.drugpo.2019.08.002. Epub 2019 Sep 18.
9
Differences by sex in associations between injection drug risks and drug crime conviction among people who inject drugs in Almaty, Kazakhstan.在哈萨克斯坦阿拉木图,注射吸毒者中,性别差异对注射毒品风险与毒品犯罪定罪之间的关联。
Int J Drug Policy. 2018 Oct;60:96-106. doi: 10.1016/j.drugpo.2018.07.014. Epub 2018 Sep 13.
10
A fragmented code: The moral and structural context for providing assistance with injection drug use initiation in San Diego, USA.一个支离破碎的代码:在美国圣地亚哥提供注射毒品使用起始援助的道德和结构背景。
Int J Drug Policy. 2018 May;55:51-60. doi: 10.1016/j.drugpo.2018.02.009. Epub 2018 Mar 7.

本文引用的文献

1
Reply to 'Addiction as a brain disease does not promote injustice'.对《成瘾作为一种脑部疾病不会助长不公正》的回应
Nat Hum Behav. 2017 Sep;1(9):611. doi: 10.1038/s41562-017-0216-0.
2
HIV and the criminalisation of drug use among people who inject drugs: a systematic review.HIV 和对注射吸毒者药物使用行为的刑事定罪:系统综述。
Lancet HIV. 2017 Aug;4(8):e357-e374. doi: 10.1016/S2352-3018(17)30073-5. Epub 2017 May 14.
3
The Drug Abuse Prevention and Control Act of 1970: Retrospective Assessments of Disparate Treatment and Consequential Impact.1970年《药物滥用预防与控制法》:对差别待遇及相应影响的回顾性评估
Soc Work Public Health. 2017;32(4):290-300. doi: 10.1080/19371918.2017.1282389. Epub 2017 Mar 7.
4
Cannabis clubs in Uruguay: The challenges of regulation.乌拉圭的大麻俱乐部:监管面临的挑战。
Int J Drug Policy. 2016 Aug;34:41-8. doi: 10.1016/j.drugpo.2016.05.015. Epub 2016 Jul 15.
5
The Opioid Epidemic: AMA's response.阿片类药物流行:美国医学协会的应对措施。
Am Fam Physician. 2016 Jun 15;93(12):975.
6
The ethics of community-based research with people who use drugs: results of a scoping review.针对吸毒者的社区研究伦理:一项范围综述的结果
BMC Med Ethics. 2016 Apr 29;17(1):25. doi: 10.1186/s12910-016-0108-2.
7
Evaluating the public health impacts of legalizing recreational cannabis use in the United States.评估美国娱乐用大麻合法化对公共健康的影响。
Addiction. 2016 Oct;111(10):1764-73. doi: 10.1111/add.13428. Epub 2016 Jun 7.
8
Application of a Brief Measure of Delay Discounting to Examine the Relationship Between Delay Discounting and the Initiation of Substance Use Among Adolescents.应用一种简短的延迟折扣测量方法来检验延迟折扣与青少年物质使用起始之间的关系。
Subst Use Misuse. 2016;51(4):540-4. doi: 10.3109/10826084.2015.1126740. Epub 2016 Mar 4.
9
Trends in high-dose opioid prescribing in Canada.加拿大高剂量阿片类药物处方趋势。
Can Fam Physician. 2014 Sep;60(9):826-32.
10
The burden of premature opioid-related mortality.过早出现的与阿片类药物相关的死亡负担。
Addiction. 2014 Sep;109(9):1482-8. doi: 10.1111/add.12598. Epub 2014 Jul 7.

战后预防:毒品战争后的新兴框架预防药物滥用。

Post-war prevention: Emerging frameworks to prevent drug use after the War on Drugs.

机构信息

Division of Global Public Health, University of California San Diego, United States; Centre for Urban Health Solutions, St. Michael's Hospital, Toronto, Canada.

出版信息

Int J Drug Policy. 2018 Jan;51:160-164. doi: 10.1016/j.drugpo.2017.06.012. Epub 2017 Jul 19.

DOI:10.1016/j.drugpo.2017.06.012
PMID:28734744
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC6042507/
Abstract

The prevention of drug use is one of the primary goals of the War on Drugs. However, despite investment in high-profile interventions such as social marketing campaigns and enforcement-based deterrence, these efforts have generally failed. With the emergence of novel policy frameworks to control and regulate drug use, a window of opportunity exists to test approaches to drug prevention that take into account existing evidence and the rights of individuals who use drugs. Specifically, there is a growing consensus that entry into drug use is a socially-defined event that individuals experience within particular socio-structural contexts. This understanding, coupled with a distinction between the value of preventing problematic drug use rather than all drug use, provides a useful framework within which to develop effective and rights-based approaches to drug prevention.

摘要

预防药物滥用是禁毒战争的主要目标之一。然而,尽管在社会营销活动和基于执法的威慑等引人注目的干预措施上投入了大量资金,但这些努力总体上都失败了。随着新型药物管制和监管政策框架的出现,现在有机会测试预防药物滥用的方法,这些方法需要考虑到现有证据和药物使用者的权利。具体来说,越来越多的人达成共识,即药物使用的开始是一种社会定义的事件,个人在特定的社会结构背景中经历这种事件。这种理解,加上区分预防有问题的药物使用与所有药物使用的价值,为制定有效和基于权利的药物预防方法提供了一个有用的框架。