• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

头孢洛扎他唑巴坦对澳大利亚和新西兰引起医源性感染的耐药肠杆菌科和铜绿假单胞菌的活性:来自一个抗菌药物监测计划的报告(2013-2015 年)。

Ceftolozane-tazobactam activity against drug-resistant Enterobacteriaceae and Pseudomonas aeruginosa causing healthcare-associated infections in Australia and New Zealand: Report from an Antimicrobial Surveillance Program (2013-2015).

机构信息

JMI Laboratories, North Liberty, IA, USA; University of Iowa College of Medicine, Iowa City, IA, USA.

JMI Laboratories, North Liberty, IA, USA.

出版信息

J Glob Antimicrob Resist. 2017 Sep;10:186-194. doi: 10.1016/j.jgar.2017.05.025. Epub 2017 Jul 19.

DOI:10.1016/j.jgar.2017.05.025
PMID:28735046
Abstract

OBJECTIVES

To evaluate the in vitro activity of ceftolozane-tazobactam and comparator agents tested against isolates of Enterobacteriaceae and Pseudomonas aeruginosa from patients in Australia and New Zealand with healthcare-associated infection.

METHODS

A total of 1459 gram-negative organisms (440 P. aeruginosa and 1019 Enterobacteriaceae) were consecutively collected from 11 medical centers located in Australia and New Zealand. The organisms were tested for susceptibility by broth microdilution methods as described by the CLSI M07-A10 document and the results interpreted according to EUCAST and CLSI breakpoint criteria.

RESULTS

Ceftolozane-tazobactam (MIC, 0.25/0.5μg/mL; 97.7/95.9% susceptible [CLSI/EUCAST]), meropenem (MIC, ≤0.06/≤0.06μg/mL; 99.8/99.9% susceptible [CLSI/EUCAST]) and amikacin (MIC, 2/4μg/mL; 99.8/99.6% susceptible [CLSI/EUCAST]) were the most active compounds tested against Enterobacteriaceae. Enterobacteriaceae isolates displayed susceptibility rates to other β-lactam agents ranging from 95.3/94.4% for cefepime, 94.1/91.4% for piperacillin-tazobactam, and 93.3/91.5% for ceftazidime using CLSI/EUCAST breakpoints. Among the Enterobacteriaceae isolates tested, 0.1% were CRE and 6.6% exhibited an ESBL non-CRE phenotype. Whereas ceftolozane-tazobactam showed good activity against ESBL non-CRE phenotype strains of Enterobacteriaceae (MIC, 0.5/2μg/mL), it lacked useful activity (MIC, >32μg/mL) against the single isolate with a CRE resistant phenotype. Ceftolozane-tazobactam was the most potent (MIC, 0.5/2μg/mL) β-lactam agent tested against P. aeruginosa isolates, inhibiting 95.7% at an MIC of ≤4μg/mL.

CONCLUSIONS

Ceftolozane-tazobactam was the most active β-lactam agent tested against P. aeruginosa and demonstrated higher in vitro activity than currently available cephalosporins and piperacillin-tazobactam when tested against Enterobacteriaceae.

摘要

目的

评估头孢洛扎他唑巴坦和比较剂在澳大利亚和新西兰与医疗保健相关感染的患者的肠杆菌科和铜绿假单胞菌分离株中的体外活性。

方法

从澳大利亚和新西兰的 11 家医疗中心连续收集了 1459 株革兰氏阴性菌(440 株铜绿假单胞菌和 1019 株肠杆菌科)。采用 CLSI M07-A10 文件中描述的肉汤微量稀释法对这些细菌进行药敏试验,并根据 EUCAST 和 CLSI 折点标准进行解释。

结果

头孢洛扎他唑巴坦(MIC,0.25/0.5μg/mL;97.7/95.9%敏感[CLSI/EUCAST])、美罗培南(MIC,≤0.06/≤0.06μg/mL;99.8/99.9%敏感[CLSI/EUCAST])和阿米卡星(MIC,2/4μg/mL;99.8/99.6%敏感[CLSI/EUCAST])是对肠杆菌科最具活性的化合物。肠杆菌科分离株对其他β-内酰胺类药物的敏感性率在头孢吡肟为 95.3/94.4%、哌拉西林他唑巴坦为 94.1/91.4%和头孢他啶为 93.3/91.5%之间,这些数据使用 CLSI/EUCAST 折点。在所测试的肠杆菌科分离株中,有 0.1%为 CRE,有 6.6%表现出非 CRE 型 ESBL 表型。虽然头孢洛扎他唑巴坦对肠杆菌科的 ESBL 非 CRE 表型菌株具有良好的活性(MIC,0.5/2μg/mL),但它对具有 CRE 耐药表型的单个分离株缺乏有用的活性(MIC,>32μg/mL)。头孢洛扎他唑巴坦是对铜绿假单胞菌分离株最有效的(MIC,0.5/2μg/mL)β-内酰胺类药物,在 MIC 为≤4μg/mL 时抑制了 95.7%的菌株。

结论

头孢洛扎他唑巴坦是对铜绿假单胞菌最具活性的β-内酰胺类药物,与目前可用的头孢菌素类和哌拉西林他唑巴坦相比,对肠杆菌科具有更高的体外活性。

相似文献

1
Ceftolozane-tazobactam activity against drug-resistant Enterobacteriaceae and Pseudomonas aeruginosa causing healthcare-associated infections in Australia and New Zealand: Report from an Antimicrobial Surveillance Program (2013-2015).头孢洛扎他唑巴坦对澳大利亚和新西兰引起医源性感染的耐药肠杆菌科和铜绿假单胞菌的活性:来自一个抗菌药物监测计划的报告(2013-2015 年)。
J Glob Antimicrob Resist. 2017 Sep;10:186-194. doi: 10.1016/j.jgar.2017.05.025. Epub 2017 Jul 19.
2
Ceftolozane/tazobactam activity against drug-resistant Enterobacteriaceae and Pseudomonas aeruginosa causing healthcare-associated infections in the Asia-Pacific region (minus China, Australia and New Zealand): report from an Antimicrobial Surveillance Programme (2013-2015).头孢洛扎/他唑巴坦对亚太地区(不包括中国、澳大利亚和新西兰)引起的医疗保健相关感染的耐药肠杆菌科和铜绿假单胞菌的活性:来自抗菌监测计划(2013-2015 年)的报告。
Int J Antimicrob Agents. 2018 Feb;51(2):181-189. doi: 10.1016/j.ijantimicag.2017.09.016. Epub 2017 Oct 6.
3
Ceftolozane/tazobactam activity against drug-resistant Enterobacteriaceae and Pseudomonas aeruginosa causing urinary tract and intraabdominal infections in Europe: report from an antimicrobial surveillance programme (2012-15).头孢洛扎/他唑巴坦对引起欧洲尿路感染和腹腔内感染的耐药肠杆菌科细菌及铜绿假单胞菌的活性:一项抗菌药物监测计划(2012 - 2015年)的报告
J Antimicrob Chemother. 2017 May 1;72(5):1386-1395. doi: 10.1093/jac/dkx009.
4
Ceftolozane-tazobactam activity against drug-resistant Enterobacteriaceae and Pseudomonas aeruginosa causing healthcare-associated infections in Latin America: report from an antimicrobial surveillance program (2013-2015).头孢他啶阿维巴坦对拉丁美洲引起医疗保健相关感染的耐药肠杆菌科细菌和铜绿假单胞菌的活性:一项抗菌监测计划(2013 - 2015年)的报告
Braz J Infect Dis. 2017 Nov-Dec;21(6):627-637. doi: 10.1016/j.bjid.2017.06.008. Epub 2017 Sep 21.
5
Antimicrobial Activity of Ceftolozane-Tazobactam Tested Against Enterobacteriaceae and Pseudomonas aeruginosa with Various Resistance Patterns Isolated in U.S. Hospitals (2013-2016) as Part of the Surveillance Program: Program to Assess Ceftolozane-Tazobactam Susceptibility.作为监测项目“头孢洛扎-他唑巴坦敏感性评估项目”的一部分,对2013年至2016年在美国医院分离出的具有各种耐药模式的肠杆菌科细菌和铜绿假单胞菌进行头孢洛扎-他唑巴坦抗菌活性测试
Microb Drug Resist. 2018 Jun;24(5):563-577. doi: 10.1089/mdr.2017.0266. Epub 2017 Oct 17.
6
Antimicrobial activity of ceftolozane/tazobactam tested against Pseudomonas aeruginosa and Enterobacteriaceae with various resistance patterns isolated in European hospitals (2011-12).针对2011 - 12年在欧洲医院分离出的具有不同耐药模式的铜绿假单胞菌和肠杆菌科细菌测试头孢洛扎/他唑巴坦的抗菌活性。
J Antimicrob Chemother. 2014 Oct;69(10):2713-22. doi: 10.1093/jac/dku184. Epub 2014 Jun 10.
7
In vitro activity of ceftolozane/tazobactam against clinical isolates of Pseudomonas aeruginosa and Enterobacteriaceae recovered in Spanish medical centres: Results of the CENIT study.在体外研究头孢洛扎/他唑巴坦对西班牙医疗机构分离的铜绿假单胞菌和肠杆菌科临床分离株的活性:CENIT 研究结果。
Int J Antimicrob Agents. 2015 Nov;46(5):502-10. doi: 10.1016/j.ijantimicag.2015.07.004. Epub 2015 Aug 10.
8
Antimicrobial activity of ceftolozane-tazobactam tested against Enterobacteriaceae and Pseudomonas aeruginosa collected from patients with bloodstream infections isolated in United States hospitals (2013-2015) as part of the Program to Assess Ceftolozane-Tazobactam Susceptibility (PACTS) surveillance program.作为评估头孢洛扎/他唑巴坦敏感性(PACTS)监测项目的一部分,对从美国医院(2013 - 2015年)血流感染患者中分离出的肠杆菌科细菌和铜绿假单胞菌进行头孢洛扎/他唑巴坦抗菌活性测试。
Diagn Microbiol Infect Dis. 2018 Oct;92(2):158-163. doi: 10.1016/j.diagmicrobio.2018.05.011. Epub 2018 May 18.
9
Ceftolozane/Tazobactam Activity Against Drug-Resistant and Causing Healthcare-Associated Infections in Eight Asian Countries: Report from an Antimicrobial Surveillance Program (2016-2018).头孢洛扎/他唑巴坦对八个亚洲国家耐药且引起医疗保健相关感染的细菌的活性:一项抗菌监测计划(2016 - 2018年)的报告
Infect Drug Resist. 2022 Nov 22;15:6739-6753. doi: 10.2147/IDR.S387097. eCollection 2022.
10
Ceftolozane/tazobactam activity tested against Gram-negative bacterial isolates from hospitalised patients with pneumonia in US and European medical centres (2012).头孢洛扎/他唑巴坦对来自美国和欧洲医疗机构住院肺炎患者分离的革兰氏阴性细菌的活性研究(2012 年)。
Int J Antimicrob Agents. 2014 Jun;43(6):533-9. doi: 10.1016/j.ijantimicag.2014.01.032. Epub 2014 Mar 26.

引用本文的文献

1
Ceftolozane/tazobactam disrupts Pseudomonas aeruginosa biofilms under static and dynamic conditions.头孢他啶/他唑巴坦在静态和动态条件下均可破坏铜绿假单胞菌生物被膜。
J Antimicrob Chemother. 2025 Feb 3;80(2):372-380. doi: 10.1093/jac/dkae413.
2
Global evaluation of the antibacterial activity of Ceftolozane/Tazobactam against ESBLs-producing and : a systematic review and meta-analysis.头孢他啶/他唑巴坦对产超广谱β-内酰胺酶菌及[此处原文缺失部分内容]的抗菌活性的全球评估:一项系统评价和荟萃分析
Ther Adv Infect Dis. 2023 Nov 17;10:20499361231212074. doi: 10.1177/20499361231212074. eCollection 2023 Jan-Dec.
3
Satisfactory In Vitro Activity of Ceftolozane-Tazobactam against Carbapenem-Resistant But Not against Isolates.
头孢洛扎他唑巴坦对碳青霉烯类耐药但对非耐药分离株具有满意的体外活性。
Medicina (Kaunas). 2023 Mar 7;59(3):518. doi: 10.3390/medicina59030518.
4
Comparative In Vitro Activity of Ceftolozane/Tazobactam against Clinical Isolates of and from Five Latin American Countries.头孢洛扎/他唑巴坦对来自五个拉丁美洲国家的[具体细菌名称缺失]临床分离株的体外活性比较
Antibiotics (Basel). 2022 Aug 13;11(8):1101. doi: 10.3390/antibiotics11081101.
5
Infectious Diseases Society of America 2022 Guidance on the Treatment of Extended-Spectrum β-lactamase Producing Enterobacterales (ESBL-E), Carbapenem-Resistant Enterobacterales (CRE), and Pseudomonas aeruginosa with Difficult-to-Treat Resistance (DTR-P. aeruginosa).美国传染病学会 2022 年关于治疗产超广谱β-内酰胺酶肠杆菌科细菌(ESBL-E)、耐碳青霉烯肠杆菌科细菌(CRE)和治疗困难的耐药铜绿假单胞菌(DTR-P. aeruginosa)的指导意见。
Clin Infect Dis. 2022 Aug 25;75(2):187-212. doi: 10.1093/cid/ciac268.
6
New β-Lactam-β-Lactamase Inhibitor Combinations.新型β-内酰胺类-β-内酰胺酶抑制剂复方制剂
Clin Microbiol Rev. 2020 Nov 11;34(1). doi: 10.1128/CMR.00115-20. Print 2020 Dec 16.
7
In vitro activity of ceftazidime-avibactam and comparators against Gram-negative bacterial isolates collected in the Asia-Pacific region as part of the INFORM program (2015-2017).亚太地区 INFORM 项目(2015-2017 年)收集的革兰氏阴性细菌分离株的头孢他啶-阿维巴坦和对照药物的体外活性。
Ann Clin Microbiol Antimicrob. 2020 Apr 1;19(1):14. doi: 10.1186/s12941-020-00355-1.
8
Antimicrobial resistance in nephrology.肾脏病学中的抗菌药物耐药性。
Nat Rev Nephrol. 2019 Aug;15(8):463-481. doi: 10.1038/s41581-019-0150-7.
9
Healthcare-associated infections: potential for prevention through vaccination.医疗保健相关感染:通过接种疫苗预防的可能性。
Ther Adv Vaccines Immunother. 2018 Feb;6(1):19-27. doi: 10.1177/2515135518763183. Epub 2018 Mar 14.
10
Multicenter Evaluation of the Etest Gradient Diffusion Method for Ceftolozane-Tazobactam Susceptibility Testing of Enterobacteriaceae and Pseudomonas aeruginosa.多中心评估 Etest 梯度扩散法检测肠杆菌科和铜绿假单胞菌对头孢他啶-他唑巴坦的药敏试验。
J Clin Microbiol. 2018 Aug 27;56(9). doi: 10.1128/JCM.00717-18. Print 2018 Sep.