Suppr超能文献

多中心评估 Etest 梯度扩散法检测肠杆菌科和铜绿假单胞菌对头孢他啶-他唑巴坦的药敏试验。

Multicenter Evaluation of the Etest Gradient Diffusion Method for Ceftolozane-Tazobactam Susceptibility Testing of Enterobacteriaceae and Pseudomonas aeruginosa.

机构信息

Department of Pathology and Immunology, Washington University School of Medicine, St. Louis, Missouri, USA.

bioMérieux Inc., Hazelwood, Missouri, USA.

出版信息

J Clin Microbiol. 2018 Aug 27;56(9). doi: 10.1128/JCM.00717-18. Print 2018 Sep.

Abstract

Ceftolozane-tazobactam (C/T) is a novel beta-lactam-beta-lactamase inhibitor combination antibiotic approved by the U.S. Food and Drug Administration in 2014 for the treatment of complicated intra-abdominal infections (in combination with metronidazole) and complicated urinary tract infections. In this study, we evaluated the performance of the C/T Etest, a gradient diffusion method. C/T Etest was compared to broth microdilution (BMD) for 51 challenge isolates and 39 challenge isolates at three clinical sites. Essential agreement (EA) between the methods ranged from 47 to 49/51 (92.2 to 96.1%) for the , and categorical agreement (CA) ranged from 49 to 51/51 (96.1 to 100.0%). EA and CA for were 100% at all sites. The C/T Etest was also compared to BMD for susceptibility testing on 966 clinical isolates (793 , including 167 and 159 isolates, in addition to 173 isolates) collected at four clinical sites. EA between Etest and BMD was 96.9% for isolates and 98.8% for isolates. Within the , isolates from each species examined had >96% CA. For the clinical isolates, no very major errors were identified but two major errors were found (one for and one for ). By BMD, 47.0% of and 46.2% of challenge strains were nonsusceptible to C/T by CLSI breakpoint criteria; 8.2% of clinical isolates and 12.1% of clinical isolates were nonsusceptible to C/T by CLSI breakpoint criteria. In conclusion, Etest is accurate and reproducible for C/T susceptibility testing of and .

摘要

头孢洛扎他唑巴坦(C/T)是一种新型β-内酰胺-β-内酰胺酶抑制剂复方抗生素,于 2014 年被美国食品和药物管理局批准用于治疗复杂性腹腔内感染(与甲硝唑联合使用)和复杂性尿路感染。在这项研究中,我们评估了 C/T Etest 的性能,这是一种梯度扩散方法。C/T Etest 与肉汤微量稀释法(BMD)对 51 株挑战分离株和 39 株挑战分离株在三个临床地点进行了比较。两种方法之间的主要一致性(EA)为 47-49/51(92.2-96.1%),分类一致性(CA)为 49-51/51(96.1-100.0%)。在所有地点, 与 100%的 EA 和 CA。C/T Etest 还与 BMD 对四个临床地点收集的 966 株临床分离株(793 株,包括 167 株和 159 株,此外还有 173 株)进行了药敏试验比较。Etest 与 BMD 对 分离株的 EA 为 96.9%,对 分离株的 EA 为 98.8%。在 内,每种检测到的分离株均有>96%的 CA。对于临床分离株,未发现非常大的错误,但发现了两个大错误(一个是 ,一个是 )。根据 BMD,47.0%的 和 46.2%的 挑战株对 C/T 的药敏性不符合 CLSI 折点标准;47.0%的 和 46.2%的 挑战株对 C/T 的药敏性不符合 CLSI 折点标准;47.0%的 和 46.2%的 挑战株对 C/T 的药敏性不符合 CLSI 折点标准;47.0%的 和 46.2%的 挑战株对 C/T 的药敏性不符合 CLSI 折点标准;47.0%的 和 46.2%的 挑战株对 C/T 的药敏性不符合 CLSI 折点标准。临床分离株中,CLSI 折点标准不符合 C/T 药敏性的 有 8.2%, 有 12.1%。总之,Etest 对 和 的 C/T 药敏试验是准确和可重复的。

相似文献

引用本文的文献

本文引用的文献

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验