• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

法国门诊腰椎间盘显微切除术:从经济需求到临床标准——一项对201例患者的观察性研究

Outpatient Lumbar Microdiscectomy in France: From an Economic Imperative to a Clinical Standard-An Observational Study of 201 Cases.

作者信息

Debono Bertrand, Sabatier Pascal, Garnault Valérie, Hamel Olivier, Bousquet Philippe, Lescure Jean-Paul, Plas Jean-Yves

机构信息

Neurosurgery Department, CAPIO - Clinique des Cèdres, Cornebarrieu, France.

Neurosurgery Department, CAPIO - Clinique des Cèdres, Cornebarrieu, France.

出版信息

World Neurosurg. 2017 Oct;106:891-897. doi: 10.1016/j.wneu.2017.07.065. Epub 2017 Jul 20.

DOI:10.1016/j.wneu.2017.07.065
PMID:28735120
Abstract

PURPOSE

The outpatient lumbar discectomy procedures have been established for more than 2 decades. However, especially in Europe, there are still obstacles to the development of these procedures, which may be related to medicoeconomic imperatives, and to several factors concerning both surgeons and patients. We describe our initial experience in introducing this method in our institution.

METHODS

During a 3-year period, 201 patients met the criteria for ambulatory lumbar microdiscectomy. A dedicated fast-tracking unit provided preoperative patient education and immediate postoperative follow-up. A surgical consultation was organized 6 weeks after surgery, and a late satisfaction phone survey concerning ambulatory management was carried out after 6 months.

RESULTS

The average total inpatient time was 10 hours and 12 minutes. One patient (0.5%) remained overnight because of an anxiety attack. No patients contacted the FT unit during the first night, and no complications occurred. All patients were reviewed in consultation around day 45: the average visual analog scale score was significantly reduced. At this early postoperative follow-up, 87.5% of patients were (very) satisfied with this procedure. At the day 180 survey, average visual analog scale scores were not significantly different from the day 45 data. In terms of return to normal activities of daily living, 120 patients (60%) had no limitation, 72 patients (36%) had minor or major limitations, and 8 (4%) were incapacitated. At this final evaluation, 8% of patients (n = 16) were very satisfied, 73% were satisfied (n = 146), 11% (n = 22) were partly satisfied, and 8% (n = 16) were not satisfied with the outpatient procedure.

CONCLUSIONS

Reducing hospitalization for lumbar discectomies to a few hours is not a reduction in the quality of care. It is not necessarily simple to overcome the resistances of all protagonists, but placing the patient as the main actor of an integrated management plan is the key to transforming a medicoeconomic incentive into a clinical success.

摘要

目的

门诊腰椎间盘切除术已开展二十多年。然而,尤其是在欧洲,这些手术的发展仍存在障碍,这可能与医疗经济需求以及与外科医生和患者相关的若干因素有关。我们描述了在本机构引入该方法的初步经验。

方法

在3年期间,201例患者符合门诊腰椎显微椎间盘切除术的标准。一个专门的快速跟踪单元提供术前患者教育和术后即时随访。术后6周组织手术咨询,并在6个月后进行关于门诊管理的晚期满意度电话调查。

结果

平均总住院时间为10小时12分钟。1例患者(0.5%)因焦虑发作而留院过夜。第一晚无患者联系快速跟踪单元,且未发生并发症。所有患者在术后约45天接受复查:平均视觉模拟量表评分显著降低。在术后早期随访中,87.5%的患者对该手术(非常)满意。在第180天的调查中,平均视觉模拟量表评分与第45天的数据无显著差异。在恢复正常日常生活方面,120例患者(60%)无限制,72例患者(36%)有轻微或严重限制,8例(4%)丧失能力。在最终评估中,8%的患者(n = 16)非常满意,73%的患者(n = 146)满意,11%(n = 22)部分满意,8%(n = 16)对门诊手术不满意。

结论

将腰椎间盘切除术的住院时间缩短至数小时并不会降低护理质量。克服所有相关方的阻力并非易事,但将患者作为综合管理计划的主要参与者是将医疗经济激励转化为临床成功的关键。

相似文献

1
Outpatient Lumbar Microdiscectomy in France: From an Economic Imperative to a Clinical Standard-An Observational Study of 201 Cases.法国门诊腰椎间盘显微切除术:从经济需求到临床标准——一项对201例患者的观察性研究
World Neurosurg. 2017 Oct;106:891-897. doi: 10.1016/j.wneu.2017.07.065. Epub 2017 Jul 20.
2
Development of an outpatient protocol for lumbar discectomy: our institutional experience.腰椎间盘切除术门诊治疗方案的制定:我们的机构经验。
World Neurosurg. 2014 Nov;82(5):897-901. doi: 10.1016/j.wneu.2014.05.035. Epub 2014 Jun 5.
3
Two-year follow-up after microsurgical discectomy and dynamic percutaneous stabilization in degenerate and herniated lumbar disc: clinical and neuroradiological outcome.退变及突出型腰椎间盘显微手术切除及动态经皮稳定术后两年随访:临床及神经放射学结果
J Neurosurg Sci. 2014 Jun;58(2):95-102.
4
The outcomes of lumbar microdiscectomy in a young, active population: correlation by herniation type and level.年轻、活跃人群腰椎显微椎间盘切除术的结果:按突出类型和节段的相关性
Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 2008 Jan 1;33(1):33-8. doi: 10.1097/BRS.0b013e31815e3a42.
5
Outpatient lumbar microdiscectomy: a prospective study in 122 patients.
Can J Neurol Sci. 2002 Aug;29(3):249-52. doi: 10.1017/s031716710000202x.
6
Day case lumbar discectomy--viable option in the UK?日间腰椎间盘切除术——在英国可行吗?
Br J Neurosurg. 2014 Jun;28(3):320-3. doi: 10.3109/02688697.2013.848839. Epub 2013 Oct 21.
7
Comparing clinical outcomes of repeat discectomy versus fusion for recurrent disc herniation utilizing the NQOD.利用国家质量结果数据库(NQOD)比较复发性椎间盘突出症再次椎间盘切除术与融合术的临床结果。
J Neurosurg Spine. 2017 Jan;26(1):39-44. doi: 10.3171/2016.5.SPINE1616. Epub 2016 Aug 12.
8
Microlumbar discectomy. Is it safe as an outpatient procedure?
Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 1994 May 1;19(9):1070-4.
9
Minimally invasive tubular microdiscectomy for recurrent lumbar disc herniation.微创管状显微椎间盘切除术治疗复发性腰椎间盘突出症
J Neurosurg Spine. 2016 Jan;24(1):48-53. doi: 10.3171/2015.4.SPINE14883. Epub 2015 Sep 18.
10
Microdiscectomy compared with standard discectomy: an old problem revisited with new outcome measures within the framework of a spine surgical registry.显微椎间盘切除术与标准椎间盘切除术的比较:在脊柱手术登记框架内,采用新的结局指标重新审视一个老问题。
Eur Spine J. 2009 Aug;18 Suppl 3(Suppl 3):360-6. doi: 10.1007/s00586-009-0917-9. Epub 2009 Mar 3.

引用本文的文献

1
Enhanced recovery after elective spinal surgery: an Australian pilot study.择期脊柱手术后的加速康复:一项澳大利亚的试点研究。
J Spine Surg. 2024 Mar 20;10(1):30-39. doi: 10.21037/jss-23-115. Epub 2024 Jan 16.
2
Complications associated with lumbar discectomy surgical techniques: a systematic review.腰椎间盘切除术手术技术相关并发症:一项系统综述。
J Spine Surg. 2022 Sep;8(3):377-389. doi: 10.21037/jss-21-59.
3
Safety and feasibility of same-day discharge following lumbar decompression surgery: A systematic review.腰椎减压手术后当日出院的安全性与可行性:一项系统评价
Brain Spine. 2022 Apr 18;2:100888. doi: 10.1016/j.bas.2022.100888. eCollection 2022.
4
Spadework for Establishing Integrative Enhanced Recovery Program After Spine Surgery: Web-Based Survey Assessing Korean Medical Doctors' Perspectives.脊柱手术后建立综合强化康复计划的前期工作:基于网络的调查评估韩国医生的观点。
J Pain Res. 2022 Apr 11;15:1039-1049. doi: 10.2147/JPR.S356434. eCollection 2022.
5
Enhanced Recovery After Surgery (ERAS) protocols for spine surgery - review of literature.脊柱手术的术后加速康复(ERAS)方案——文献回顾。
Anaesthesiol Intensive Ther. 2022;54(1):71-79. doi: 10.5114/ait.2022.113961.
6
Integrated care pathways in neurosurgery: A systematic review.神经外科整合照护路径:系统性回顾。
PLoS One. 2021 Aug 2;16(8):e0255628. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0255628. eCollection 2021.
7
Recoup From Home? Comparison of Relative Cost Savings for ACDF, Lumbar Discectomy, and Short Segment Fusion Performed in the Inpatient Versus Outpatient Setting.在家康复?住院与门诊环境下进行的颈椎前路椎间盘切除融合术、腰椎间盘切除术和短节段融合术的相对成本节约比较。
Global Spine J. 2021 Apr;11(1_suppl):56S-65S. doi: 10.1177/2192568220968772.
8
Low Complication Rate of Anterior Lumbar Spine Surgery in an Ambulatory Surgery Center.门诊手术中心腰椎前路手术的低并发症发生率
Int J Spine Surg. 2020 Oct;14(5):687-693. doi: 10.14444/7100. Epub 2020 Oct 23.
9
Enhanced Recovery After Surgery Trends in Adult Spine Surgery: A Systematic Review.成人脊柱手术术后加速康复趋势:一项系统评价
Int J Spine Surg. 2020 Aug;14(4):623-640. doi: 10.14444/7083. Epub 2020 Jul 31.
10
Anesthetic considerations in spine surgery: What orthopaedic surgeon should know!脊柱手术的麻醉注意事项:骨科医生应知晓的内容!
J Clin Orthop Trauma. 2020 Sep-Oct;11(5):742-748. doi: 10.1016/j.jcot.2020.05.005. Epub 2020 May 11.