• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

相似文献

1
Recoup From Home? Comparison of Relative Cost Savings for ACDF, Lumbar Discectomy, and Short Segment Fusion Performed in the Inpatient Versus Outpatient Setting.在家康复?住院与门诊环境下进行的颈椎前路椎间盘切除融合术、腰椎间盘切除术和短节段融合术的相对成本节约比较。
Global Spine J. 2021 Apr;11(1_suppl):56S-65S. doi: 10.1177/2192568220968772.
2
Anterior cervical discectomy and fusion in the outpatient ambulatory surgery setting compared with the inpatient hospital setting: analysis of 1000 consecutive cases.门诊日间手术环境下与住院环境下的颈椎前路椎间盘切除融合术:1000例连续病例分析
J Neurosurg Spine. 2016 Jun;24(6):878-84. doi: 10.3171/2015.8.SPINE14284. Epub 2016 Feb 5.
3
Discrepancies in the Definition of "Outpatient" Surgeries and Their Effect on Study Outcomes Related to ACDF and Lumbar Discectomy Procedures: A Retrospective Analysis of 45,204 Cases.“门诊”手术定义的差异及其对与颈椎前路椎间盘切除融合术和腰椎间盘切除术相关研究结果的影响:45204例病例的回顾性分析
Clin Spine Surg. 2018 Mar;31(2):E152-E159. doi: 10.1097/BSD.0000000000000615.
4
Quality analysis of anterior cervical discectomy and fusion in the outpatient versus inpatient setting: analysis of 7288 patients from the NSQIP database.门诊与住院环境下颈椎前路椎间盘切除融合术的质量分析:来自NSQIP数据库的7288例患者分析
Neurosurg Focus. 2015 Dec;39(6):E9. doi: 10.3171/2015.9.FOCUS15335.
5
Does patient selection account for the perceived cost savings in outpatient spine surgery? A meta-analysis of current evidence and analysis from an administrative database.患者选择是否是门诊脊柱手术中所认为的成本节约的原因?对现有证据的荟萃分析及来自行政数据库的分析。
J Neurosurg Spine. 2018 Dec 1;29(6):687-695. doi: 10.3171/2018.4.SPINE1864. Epub 2018 Sep 14.
6
Retrospective single-surgeon study of 1123 consecutive cases of anterior cervical discectomy and fusion: a comparison of clinical outcome parameters, complication rates, and costs between outpatient and inpatient surgery groups, with a literature review.对1123例连续的颈椎前路椎间盘切除融合术病例进行的单外科医生回顾性研究:门诊手术组与住院手术组临床结果参数、并发症发生率及费用的比较,并附文献综述
J Neurosurg Spine. 2018 Jun;28(6):630-641. doi: 10.3171/2017.10.SPINE17938. Epub 2018 Mar 30.
7
Outpatient anterior cervical discectomy and fusion: A meta-analysis.门诊前路颈椎间盘切除融合术:一项荟萃分析。
J Clin Neurosci. 2016 Dec;34:166-168. doi: 10.1016/j.jocn.2016.06.012. Epub 2016 Jul 27.
8
A Comparison of 30-Day Hospital Readmission and Complication Rates After Outpatient Versus Inpatient 1 and 2 Level Anterior Cervical Discectomy and Fusion Surgery: An Analysis of a Medicare Patient Sample.门诊与住院 1 级和 2 级前路颈椎间盘切除融合术后 30 天内再入院率和并发症率的比较:对 Medicare 患者样本的分析。
World Neurosurg. 2019 Sep;129:e233-e239. doi: 10.1016/j.wneu.2019.05.120. Epub 2019 May 23.
9
Outpatient versus inpatient lumbar decompression surgery: a matched noninferiority study investigating clinical and patient-reported outcomes.门诊与住院腰椎减压手术:一项调查临床和患者报告结局的配对非劣效性研究。
J Neurosurg Spine. 2022 May 6;37(4):485-497. doi: 10.3171/2022.3.SPINE211558. Print 2022 Oct 1.
10
Recent trends in medicare utilization and reimbursement for lumbar spine fusion and discectomy procedures.近年来,腰椎融合术和椎间盘切除术的医疗保险利用和报销情况的变化趋势。
Spine J. 2020 Oct;20(10):1586-1594. doi: 10.1016/j.spinee.2020.05.558. Epub 2020 Jun 10.

引用本文的文献

1
Predictive value of Hounsfield units and vertebral bone quality on cage subsidence in oblique lateral interbody fusion with bilateral posterior fixation.在双侧后路固定的斜外侧椎间融合术中,Hounsfield单位和椎体骨质量对椎间融合器沉降的预测价值。
J Orthop Surg Res. 2025 Jun 16;20(1):588. doi: 10.1186/s13018-025-06016-3.
2
The Safety and Efficacy of Posterior Lumbar Interbody Fusions in the Outpatient Setting.门诊环境下腰椎后路椎间融合术的安全性和有效性
Cureus. 2024 Feb 5;16(2):e53662. doi: 10.7759/cureus.53662. eCollection 2024 Feb.
3
Use of ChatGPT for Determining Clinical and Surgical Treatment of Lumbar Disc Herniation With Radiculopathy: A North American Spine Society Guideline Comparison.使用ChatGPT确定伴神经根病的腰椎间盘突出症的临床和手术治疗:与北美脊柱协会指南的比较
Neurospine. 2024 Mar;21(1):149-158. doi: 10.14245/ns.2347052.526. Epub 2024 Jan 31.
4
Is outpatient spine surgery associated with new, persistent opioid use in opioid-naïve patients? A retrospective national claims database analysis.门诊脊柱手术是否与阿片类药物初治患者新的、持续的阿片类药物使用有关?一项回顾性全国索赔数据库分析。
Spine J. 2023 Oct;23(10):1451-1460. doi: 10.1016/j.spinee.2023.06.391. Epub 2023 Jun 22.
5
Bilateral Outpatient Breast Reconstruction with Stacked DIEP and Vertical PAP Flaps.采用堆叠式腹壁下动脉穿支皮瓣和垂直臀上动脉穿支皮瓣的双侧门诊乳房重建术
Plast Reconstr Surg Glob Open. 2021 Oct 18;9(10):e3878. doi: 10.1097/GOX.0000000000003878. eCollection 2021 Oct.

本文引用的文献

1
Primary single-level lumbar microdisectomy/decompression at a free-standing ambulatory surgical center vs a hospital-owned outpatient department-an analysis of 90-day outcomes and costs.在独立的日间手术中心与医院所有的门诊部行原发性单节段腰椎显微切除术/减压术的比较:90 天结局和成本分析。
Spine J. 2020 Jun;20(6):882-887. doi: 10.1016/j.spinee.2020.01.015. Epub 2020 Feb 7.
2
Lumbar spinal fusion in the outpatient setting: an update on management, surgical approaches and planning.门诊环境下的腰椎融合术:管理、手术入路及规划的最新进展
J Spine Surg. 2019 Sep;5(Suppl 2):S174-S180. doi: 10.21037/jss.2019.04.14.
3
Endoscopic transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion without general anesthesia: technical innovations and outcomes.非全身麻醉下的内镜经椎间孔腰椎椎间融合术:技术创新与结果
Ann Transl Med. 2019 Sep;7(Suppl 5):S167. doi: 10.21037/atm.2019.07.92.
4
A Review of Complication Rates for Anterior Cervical Diskectomy and Fusion (ACDF).颈椎前路椎间盘切除融合术(ACDF)并发症发生率综述。
Surg Neurol Int. 2019 Jun 7;10:100. doi: 10.25259/SNI-191-2019. eCollection 2019.
5
Establishment and Implementation of an Enhanced Recovery After Surgery (ERAS) Pathway Tailored for Minimally Invasive Transforaminal Lumbar Interbody Fusion Surgery.建立并实施微创经椎间孔腰椎间融合术的加速康复外科(ERAS)路径。
World Neurosurg. 2019 Sep;129:e317-e323. doi: 10.1016/j.wneu.2019.05.139. Epub 2019 May 24.
6
A novel technique for awake, minimally invasive transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion: technical note.一种新的清醒、微创经椎间孔腰椎体间融合技术:技术说明。
Neurosurg Focus. 2019 Apr 1;46(4):E16. doi: 10.3171/2019.1.FOCUS18510.
7
Development and implementation of a comprehensive spine surgery enhanced recovery after surgery protocol: the Cleveland Clinic experience.发展和实施全面的脊柱手术加速康复外科方案:克利夫兰诊所的经验。
Neurosurg Focus. 2019 Apr 1;46(4):E11. doi: 10.3171/2019.1.FOCUS18696.
8
Does patient selection account for the perceived cost savings in outpatient spine surgery? A meta-analysis of current evidence and analysis from an administrative database.患者选择是否是门诊脊柱手术中所认为的成本节约的原因?对现有证据的荟萃分析及来自行政数据库的分析。
J Neurosurg Spine. 2018 Dec 1;29(6):687-695. doi: 10.3171/2018.4.SPINE1864. Epub 2018 Sep 14.
9
A psoas splitting approach developed for outpatient lateral interbody fusion versus a standard transpsoas approach.一种为门诊患者腰椎侧方椎间融合术开发的腰大肌劈开入路与标准经腰大肌入路的比较。
J Spine Surg. 2018 Jun;4(2):195-202. doi: 10.21037/jss.2018.04.04.
10
Drivers of Variability in 90-day Cost for Primary Single-level Microdiscectomy.单节段经皮微椎间盘切除术 90 天费用的变异性驱动因素。
Neurosurgery. 2018 Dec 1;83(6):1153-1160. doi: 10.1093/neuros/nyy209.

在家康复?住院与门诊环境下进行的颈椎前路椎间盘切除融合术、腰椎间盘切除术和短节段融合术的相对成本节约比较。

Recoup From Home? Comparison of Relative Cost Savings for ACDF, Lumbar Discectomy, and Short Segment Fusion Performed in the Inpatient Versus Outpatient Setting.

作者信息

Mikhail Christopher M, Echt Murray, Selverian Stephen R, Cho Samuel K

机构信息

Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, 5925Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai, New York, NY, USA.

Montefiore Medical Center, Bronx, NY, USA.

出版信息

Global Spine J. 2021 Apr;11(1_suppl):56S-65S. doi: 10.1177/2192568220968772.

DOI:10.1177/2192568220968772
PMID:33890802
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC8076805/
Abstract

STUDY DESIGN

Broad narrative review.

OBJECTIVE

To review and summarize the current literature on the cost efficacy of performing ACDF, lumbar discectomy and short segment fusions of the lumbar spine performed in the outpatient setting.

METHODS

A thorough review of peer- reviewed literature was performed on the relative cost-savings, as well as guidelines, outcomes, and indications for successfully implementing outpatient protocols for routine spine procedures.

RESULTS

Primary elective 1-2 level ACDF can be safely performed in most patient populations with a higher patient satisfaction rate and no significant difference in 90-day reoperations and readmission rates, and a savings of 4000 to 41 305 USD per case. Lumbar discectomy performed through minimally invasive techniques has decreased recovery times with similar patient outcomes to open procedures. Performing lumbar microdiscectomy in the outpatient setting is safe, cheaper by as much as 12 934 USD per case and has better or equivalent outcomes to their inpatient counterparts. Unlike ACDF and lumbar microdiscectomy, short segment fusions are rarely performed in ASCs. However, with the advent of minimally invasive techniques paired with improved pain control, same-day discharge after lumbar fusion has limited clinical data but appears to have potential cost-savings up to 65-70% by reducing admissions.

CONCLUSION

Performing ACDF, lumbar discectomy and short segment fusions in the outpatient setting is a safe and effective way of reducing cost in select patient populations.

摘要

研究设计

广泛的叙述性综述。

目的

回顾并总结目前关于门诊环境下进行颈椎前路椎间盘切除融合术(ACDF)、腰椎间盘切除术和腰椎短节段融合术成本效益的文献。

方法

对同行评审文献进行全面回顾,内容包括相对成本节约情况,以及成功实施常规脊柱手术门诊方案的指南、结果和适应症。

结果

大多数患者群体均可安全地进行一期选择性1-2节段ACDF,患者满意度更高,90天再次手术和再入院率无显著差异,每例可节省4000至41305美元。通过微创技术进行的腰椎间盘切除术缩短了恢复时间,患者结果与开放手术相似。在门诊环境下进行腰椎显微椎间盘切除术是安全的,每例成本可降低多达12934美元,并且与住院手术相比具有更好或相当的结果。与ACDF和腰椎显微椎间盘切除术不同,短节段融合术很少在门诊手术中心(ASC)进行。然而,随着微创技术的出现以及疼痛控制的改善,腰椎融合术后当日出院的临床数据有限,但通过减少住院似乎有可能节省高达65%-70%的成本。

结论

在门诊环境下进行ACDF、腰椎间盘切除术和短节段融合术是在特定患者群体中降低成本的一种安全有效的方法。