Suppr超能文献

在家康复?住院与门诊环境下进行的颈椎前路椎间盘切除融合术、腰椎间盘切除术和短节段融合术的相对成本节约比较。

Recoup From Home? Comparison of Relative Cost Savings for ACDF, Lumbar Discectomy, and Short Segment Fusion Performed in the Inpatient Versus Outpatient Setting.

作者信息

Mikhail Christopher M, Echt Murray, Selverian Stephen R, Cho Samuel K

机构信息

Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, 5925Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai, New York, NY, USA.

Montefiore Medical Center, Bronx, NY, USA.

出版信息

Global Spine J. 2021 Apr;11(1_suppl):56S-65S. doi: 10.1177/2192568220968772.

Abstract

STUDY DESIGN

Broad narrative review.

OBJECTIVE

To review and summarize the current literature on the cost efficacy of performing ACDF, lumbar discectomy and short segment fusions of the lumbar spine performed in the outpatient setting.

METHODS

A thorough review of peer- reviewed literature was performed on the relative cost-savings, as well as guidelines, outcomes, and indications for successfully implementing outpatient protocols for routine spine procedures.

RESULTS

Primary elective 1-2 level ACDF can be safely performed in most patient populations with a higher patient satisfaction rate and no significant difference in 90-day reoperations and readmission rates, and a savings of 4000 to 41 305 USD per case. Lumbar discectomy performed through minimally invasive techniques has decreased recovery times with similar patient outcomes to open procedures. Performing lumbar microdiscectomy in the outpatient setting is safe, cheaper by as much as 12 934 USD per case and has better or equivalent outcomes to their inpatient counterparts. Unlike ACDF and lumbar microdiscectomy, short segment fusions are rarely performed in ASCs. However, with the advent of minimally invasive techniques paired with improved pain control, same-day discharge after lumbar fusion has limited clinical data but appears to have potential cost-savings up to 65-70% by reducing admissions.

CONCLUSION

Performing ACDF, lumbar discectomy and short segment fusions in the outpatient setting is a safe and effective way of reducing cost in select patient populations.

摘要

研究设计

广泛的叙述性综述。

目的

回顾并总结目前关于门诊环境下进行颈椎前路椎间盘切除融合术(ACDF)、腰椎间盘切除术和腰椎短节段融合术成本效益的文献。

方法

对同行评审文献进行全面回顾,内容包括相对成本节约情况,以及成功实施常规脊柱手术门诊方案的指南、结果和适应症。

结果

大多数患者群体均可安全地进行一期选择性1-2节段ACDF,患者满意度更高,90天再次手术和再入院率无显著差异,每例可节省4000至41305美元。通过微创技术进行的腰椎间盘切除术缩短了恢复时间,患者结果与开放手术相似。在门诊环境下进行腰椎显微椎间盘切除术是安全的,每例成本可降低多达12934美元,并且与住院手术相比具有更好或相当的结果。与ACDF和腰椎显微椎间盘切除术不同,短节段融合术很少在门诊手术中心(ASC)进行。然而,随着微创技术的出现以及疼痛控制的改善,腰椎融合术后当日出院的临床数据有限,但通过减少住院似乎有可能节省高达65%-70%的成本。

结论

在门诊环境下进行ACDF、腰椎间盘切除术和短节段融合术是在特定患者群体中降低成本的一种安全有效的方法。

相似文献

7
Outpatient anterior cervical discectomy and fusion: A meta-analysis.
J Clin Neurosci. 2016 Dec;34:166-168. doi: 10.1016/j.jocn.2016.06.012. Epub 2016 Jul 27.
9
Outpatient versus inpatient lumbar decompression surgery: a matched noninferiority study investigating clinical and patient-reported outcomes.
J Neurosurg Spine. 2022 May 6;37(4):485-497. doi: 10.3171/2022.3.SPINE211558. Print 2022 Oct 1.
10
Recent trends in medicare utilization and reimbursement for lumbar spine fusion and discectomy procedures.
Spine J. 2020 Oct;20(10):1586-1594. doi: 10.1016/j.spinee.2020.05.558. Epub 2020 Jun 10.

引用本文的文献

2
The Safety and Efficacy of Posterior Lumbar Interbody Fusions in the Outpatient Setting.
Cureus. 2024 Feb 5;16(2):e53662. doi: 10.7759/cureus.53662. eCollection 2024 Feb.
5
Bilateral Outpatient Breast Reconstruction with Stacked DIEP and Vertical PAP Flaps.
Plast Reconstr Surg Glob Open. 2021 Oct 18;9(10):e3878. doi: 10.1097/GOX.0000000000003878. eCollection 2021 Oct.

本文引用的文献

2
Lumbar spinal fusion in the outpatient setting: an update on management, surgical approaches and planning.
J Spine Surg. 2019 Sep;5(Suppl 2):S174-S180. doi: 10.21037/jss.2019.04.14.
4
A Review of Complication Rates for Anterior Cervical Diskectomy and Fusion (ACDF).
Surg Neurol Int. 2019 Jun 7;10:100. doi: 10.25259/SNI-191-2019. eCollection 2019.
6
A novel technique for awake, minimally invasive transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion: technical note.
Neurosurg Focus. 2019 Apr 1;46(4):E16. doi: 10.3171/2019.1.FOCUS18510.
10
Drivers of Variability in 90-day Cost for Primary Single-level Microdiscectomy.
Neurosurgery. 2018 Dec 1;83(6):1153-1160. doi: 10.1093/neuros/nyy209.

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验