Division of Endodontics, University at Buffalo, Buffalo, New York.
Division of Endodontics, University at Buffalo, Buffalo, New York.
J Endod. 2017 Sep;43(9):1532-1538. doi: 10.1016/j.joen.2017.04.022. Epub 2017 Jul 20.
The aim of this study was to investigate the shaping abilities of the XP Shaper (FKG, La Chaux-de-Fonds, Switzerland) and compare the findings with Vortex Blue (Dentsply Tulsa Dental Specialties, Tulsa, OK) using micro-computed tomographic imaging.
Twenty matched, extracted, mandibular, central incisors with a single, oval canal were scanned preoperatively at 25-μm resolution and postoperatively after instrumentation with either Vortex Blue in a crown-down manner up to size 30.04 or XP Shaper. The percent of untouched walls, changes in canal volume and surface area, the amount of dentin removed, debris remaining in the canal, and the preparation taper were determined. The total time required for instrumentation using each technique was calculated in seconds. Statistical analysis was used to compare between both groups using repeated measures multivariate analysis of variance with Bonferroni correction for post hoc comparison and independent sample t tests.
The XP Shaper significantly increased the canal volume (F = 77.948, P < .001), surface area (F = 5.543, P = .030), and amount of dentin removed (F = 10.044, P = .001) and had significantly less untouched walls (38.6% ± 8.1%) compared with VB (58.8% ± 8.5%). There was less debris at all levels of the canal in the XP Shaper group. Results were almost significant (P = .059). The XP Shaper was also significantly faster in completing the mechanical preparation of the root canal space by almost 1 minute (t = 6.216, P < .001).
The XP Shaper can expand beyond its core size to adapt to the anatomy of the root canal space. The XP Shaper can prepare and touch more canal walls in oval-shaped canals compared with Vortex Blue. However, the final preparation taper will vary according to the anatomy of the treated tooth.
本研究旨在通过微计算机断层扫描成像来研究 XP Shaper(FKG,La Chaux-de-Fonds,瑞士)的成型能力,并与 Vortex Blue(Dentsply Tulsa Dental Specialties,Tulsa,OK)进行比较。
对 20 个匹配的、提取的下颌中切牙进行术前扫描,分辨率为 25μm,然后进行根管内器械预备,使用 Crown-down 技术将 Vortex Blue 扩至 30.04 号或 XP Shaper。确定未触及壁的百分比、管腔容积和表面积的变化、去除的牙本质量、管腔内残留的碎屑量和制备锥度。用每种技术进行器械操作所需的总时间以秒为单位计算。使用重复测量多元方差分析,用 Bonferroni 校正进行事后比较和独立样本 t 检验,对两组之间进行统计学分析。
XP Shaper 显著增加了管腔容积(F=77.948,P<0.001)、表面积(F=5.543,P=0.030)和去除的牙本质量(F=10.044,P=0.001),并且与 VB(58.8%±8.5%)相比,未触及壁的比例显著较低(38.6%±8.1%)。XP Shaper 组在根管的所有水平上的碎屑都较少。结果几乎有统计学意义(P=0.059)。XP Shaper 完成机械预备根管空间的速度也快了近 1 分钟(t=6.216,P<0.001)。
XP Shaper 可以超出其核心尺寸,以适应根管空间的解剖结构。与 Vortex Blue 相比,XP Shaper 可以在椭圆形根管中预备和触及更多的根管壁。然而,最终的制备锥度将根据治疗牙的解剖结构而有所不同。