Liem Andrian, Newcombe Peter A, Pohlman Annie
School of Psychology, University of Queensland, Australia.
School of Psychology, University of Queensland, Australia.
Complement Ther Med. 2017 Aug;33:14-19. doi: 10.1016/j.ctim.2017.05.003. Epub 2017 May 31.
This study aimed to evaluate questionnaire development to measure the knowledge of Complementary-Alternative Medicine (CAM), attitudes towards CAM, CAM experiences, and CAM educational needs of clinical psychologists in Indonesia. A 26-item questionnaire was developed through an extensive literature search. Data was obtained from provisional psychologists from the Master of Professional Clinical Psychology programs at two established public universities in urban areas of Indonesia. To validate the questionnaire, panel reviews by executive members of the Indonesian Clinical Psychology Association (ICPA), experts in health psychology, and experts in public health and CAM provided their professional judgements. The self-reporting questionnaire consisted of four scales including: knowledge of CAM (6 items), attitudes towards CAM (10 items), CAM experiences (4 items), and CAM educational needs (6 items). All scales, except CAM Experiences, were assessed on a 7-point Likert scale. Sixty provisional psychologists were eligible to complete the questionnaire with a response rate of 73% (N=44). The results showed that the CAM questionnaire was reliable (Cronbach's coefficient alpha range=0.62-0.96; item-total correlation range=0.14-0.92) and demonstrated content validity. Following further psychometric evaluation, the CAM questionnaire may provide the evidence-based information to inform the education and practice of Indonesian clinical psychologists.
本研究旨在评估问卷的编制情况,以衡量印度尼西亚临床心理学家对补充替代医学(CAM)的知识、对CAM的态度、CAM经历以及CAM教育需求。通过广泛的文献检索编制了一份包含26个条目的问卷。数据来自印度尼西亚城市地区两所知名公立大学专业临床心理学硕士项目的实习心理学家。为验证该问卷,印度尼西亚临床心理学协会(ICPA)的执行成员、健康心理学专家以及公共卫生和CAM专家进行了小组评审并给出专业判断。这份自陈式问卷由四个分量表组成,包括:CAM知识(6个条目)、对CAM的态度(10个条目)、CAM经历(4个条目)以及CAM教育需求(6个条目)。除CAM经历分量表外,所有分量表均采用7点李克特量表进行评估。60名实习心理学家符合完成问卷的条件,回复率为73%(N = 44)。结果表明,CAM问卷具有可靠性(克朗巴哈系数α范围 = 0.62 - 0.96;项目与总分的相关系数范围 = 0.14 - 0.92)并具有内容效度。经过进一步的心理测量学评估,CAM问卷可能会提供基于证据的信息,为印度尼西亚临床心理学家的教育和实践提供参考。