Thiebot M H
Pharmacol Biochem Behav. 1986 May;24(5):1471-7. doi: 10.1016/0091-3057(86)90214-5.
Several studies have shown that, like benzodiazepines (BZP), treatments able to reduce or block the activity of CNS serotonergic (5-HT) neurons released punished behavior. Therefore, 5-HT mechanisms have been tentatively implicated in the anti-punishment (anxiolytic?) activity of BZP. Numerous data, however, are not in keeping with this hypothesis. Since not responding enables the animals to avoid punishment but also delays the receipt of food-reward, one of these factors could be an alteration of waiting capacities. Indeed, we have shown that diazepam released behavioral suppression in conflict schedules only when the duration of the punished periods exceeded 1 minute. Moreover, in rats allowed to choose in a T-maze between immediate-but-small vs. delayed-but-large reward, BZP significantly decreased the frequency with which the delayed reward was chosen, with 5-HT uptake blockers producing opposite effects. Therefore, one can hypothesize that BZP render the animals less prone than controls to tolerate delay of reward and that 5-HT mechanisms may be involved in this phenomenon. An altered tolerance to delay of reward should be taken into account when interpreting the BZP-induced release of behavioral inhibition in classical conflict procedures.
多项研究表明,与苯二氮䓬类药物(BZP)一样,能够降低或阻断中枢神经系统5-羟色胺能(5-HT)神经元活性的治疗方法可消除受罚行为。因此,5-HT机制被初步认为与BZP的抗惩罚(抗焦虑?)活性有关。然而,大量数据并不支持这一假设。由于不做出反应既能使动物避免受罚,又会延迟获得食物奖励,其中一个因素可能是等待能力的改变。事实上,我们已经表明,只有当受罚期持续时间超过1分钟时,地西泮才会在冲突程序中引发行为抑制。此外,在允许大鼠在T型迷宫中在即时但少量奖励与延迟但大量奖励之间进行选择的实验中,BZP显著降低了选择延迟奖励的频率,而5-HT摄取阻滞剂则产生相反的效果。因此,可以假设BZP使动物比对照组更不容易耐受奖励延迟,并且5-HT机制可能参与了这一现象。在解释经典冲突程序中BZP诱导的行为抑制释放时,应考虑对奖励延迟的耐受性改变。