Wuethrich Christian, Arai Kenta, Bergoglio Mercede, Fedchak James A, Jousten Karl, Hong Seung Soo, Guzman Jorge Torres
METAS, Lindenweg 50, 3003 Bern Wabern, Switzerland.
NMIJ-AIST, Tsukuba Central 3, Umezono 1-1-1, Tsukuba, Ibaraki 306-8563, Japan.
Metrologia. 2017;54(Technical Suppl). doi: 10.1088/0026-1394/54/1A/07003.
The comparison CCM.P-K15 is a key comparison in pressure involving six laboratories in three regional metrological organizations (RMO). The measurand of the comparison is the accommodation coefficient of two spinning rotating gauge characterized in nitrogen from 0.1 mPa up to 1.0 Pa. The two transfer standards were circulated from November 2009 until March 2011. The circulation consisted of three loops, one for each RMO, and a new calibration by the pilot between each loop. The stability of one of the transfer standards was poor and was worse than expected based on the previous history of the transfer standard while the other transfer standard demonstrated good stability while circulated in Europe and America and a fair stability while circulated in Asia. All the participants demonstrated equivalence to the definition of pressure in their respective primary standards.
CCM.P-K15比对是一项压力方面的关键比对,涉及三个区域计量组织(RMO)的六个实验室。该比对的被测量是两个旋转规在0.1毫帕至1.0帕的氮气环境中的吸附系数。两个传递标准从2009年11月至2011年3月进行了分发。分发包括三个循环,每个RMO一个循环,并且在每个循环之间由主导实验室进行一次新的校准。其中一个传递标准的稳定性较差,比根据该传递标准以往历史预期的还要差,而另一个传递标准在欧美分发时表现出良好的稳定性,在亚洲分发时稳定性尚可。所有参与者均表明其各自的基准标准与压力定义等效。