Am J Cardiol. 1986 Jul 1;58(1):1-13. doi: 10.1016/0002-9149(86)90232-8.
The Multiple Risk Factor Intervention Trial was a randomized clinical study to test whether a special-intervention (SI) program aimed at reducing serum cholesterol levels, blood pressure and cigarette smoking would prevent coronary heart disease (CHD) in middle-aged men. The main endpoint reported here is the percentage of participants experiencing first major CHD events (either nonfatal acute myocardial infarction [AMI] or CHD death) during 7 years of follow-up. This outcome was slightly less frequent in the 6,428 SI men than in the 6,438 men assigned to their usual source of care (UC). However, the relative difference--either 1% (95% confidence interval -17% to 16%) or 8% (95% confidence interval -5% to 20%), depending on how AMI was classified--was not statistically significant. Regression analyses within the SI and UC groups suggested that the cholesterol and cigarette smoking interventions reduced the number of first major CHD events: the associations between lowering the levels of these 2 factors and reductions in CHD rates were significant (p less than 0.001) and of the anticipated magnitude. A similar analysis of antihypertensive treatment in the SI group revealed no favorable association between lowering blood pressure and CHD rate, and other subgroup comparisons suggested that a mixture of beneficial and adverse effects may underlie this finding. Thus, the nonsignificant overall UC/SI contrast in CHD rates may reflect a combination of the expected beneficial effects of the cholesterol and smoking interventions with unexpected heterogeneous effects of the antihypertensive intervention. Seven of 8 other prespecified cardiovascular endpoints occurred less frequently among SI than among UC men, the difference being nominally significant (p less than 0.05) for angina pectoris, congestive heart failure and peripheral arterial disease.
多重危险因素干预试验是一项随机临床研究,旨在测试一项旨在降低血清胆固醇水平、血压和吸烟率的特殊干预(SI)计划是否能预防中年男性的冠心病(CHD)。这里报告的主要终点是在7年随访期间经历首次重大冠心病事件(非致命性急性心肌梗死[AMI]或冠心病死亡)的参与者百分比。在6428名接受特殊干预的男性中,这一结果的发生频率略低于6438名接受常规护理(UC)的男性。然而,根据AMI的分类方式,相对差异为1%(95%置信区间为-17%至16%)或8%(95%置信区间为-5%至20%),均无统计学意义。在特殊干预组和常规护理组内进行回归分析表明,胆固醇和吸烟干预措施减少了首次重大冠心病事件的数量:降低这两个因素的水平与冠心病发病率降低之间的关联显著(p<0.001),且幅度符合预期。对特殊干预组中抗高血压治疗的类似分析显示,降低血压与冠心病发病率之间没有有利关联,其他亚组比较表明,这一结果可能是有益和不利影响共同作用的结果。因此,冠心病发病率在常规护理组/特殊干预组之间的总体差异无统计学意义,这可能反映了胆固醇和吸烟干预措施预期的有益效果与抗高血压干预措施出人意料的异质性效果的综合作用。在其他预先指定的8个心血管终点中,有7个在接受特殊干预的男性中发生频率低于接受常规护理的男性,其中心绞痛、充血性心力衰竭和外周动脉疾病的差异具有名义上的显著性(p<0.05)。