• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

再次审视多项危险因素干预试验:基于试验期间非致死性和致死性复合终点、冠状动脉和心血管的新视角。

Multiple risk factor intervention trial revisited: a new perspective based on nonfatal and fatal composite endpoints, coronary and cardiovascular, during the trial.

机构信息

Northwestern University Medical School, Chicago, IL, USA.

出版信息

J Am Heart Assoc. 2012 Oct;1(5):e003640. doi: 10.1161/JAHA.112.003640. Epub 2012 Oct 25.

DOI:10.1161/JAHA.112.003640
PMID:23316301
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC3541632/
Abstract

BACKGROUND

The Multiple Risk Factor Intervention Trial evaluated a multifactor intervention on coronary heart disease (CHD) in 12 866 men. A priori defined endpoints (CHD death, CHD death or nonfatal myocardial infarction, cardiovascular disease [CVD] death, and all-cause death) did not differ significantly between the special intervention (SI) and usual care (UC) groups over an average follow-up period of 7 years. Event rates were lower than anticipated, reducing power. Other nonfatal CVD outcomes were prespecified but not considered in composite outcomes comparing SI with UC.

METHODS AND RESULTS

Post-trial CVD mortality risks associated with nonfatal CVD events occurring during the trial were determined with Cox regression. Nonfatal outcomes associated with >2-fold risk of CVD death over the subsequent 20 years were combined with during-trial deaths to create 2 new composite outcomes. SI/UC hazard ratios and 95% confidence intervals were estimated for each composite outcome. Of 10 during-trial nonfatal events, 6 were associated (P<0.001) with >2-fold risk of CVD death. A CHD composite outcome (CHD death, myocardial infarction [clinical or serial ECG change], CHF, or coronary artery surgery) was experienced by 520 SI and 602 UC men (SI/UC hazard ratio = 0.86; 95% confidence interval, 0.76-0.97; P=0.01). A CVD composite outcome (CHD [as above], other CVD deaths, stroke, or renal impairment) was experienced by 581 SI and 652 UC men (hazard ratio = 0.89; 95% confidence interval, 0.79-0.99; P=0.04).

CONCLUSIONS

In post hoc analyses, composite fatal/nonfatal CHD and CVD rates over 7 years were significantly lower for SI than for UC. These findings reinforce recommendations for improved dietary/lifestyle practices, with pharmacological therapy as needed, to prevent and control major CVD risk factors.

摘要

背景

多项危险因素干预试验评估了一项针对 12866 名男性的冠心病(CHD)多因素干预措施。预先设定的终点(CHD 死亡、CHD 死亡或非致死性心肌梗死、心血管疾病[CVD]死亡和全因死亡)在平均 7 年的随访期间,特殊干预(SI)和常规护理(UC)组之间没有显著差异。事件发生率低于预期,降低了效能。其他非致死性 CVD 结局是预先规定的,但在与 UC 比较的 SI 复合结局中未予考虑。

方法和结果

使用 Cox 回归确定与试验期间发生的非致死性 CVD 事件相关的事后 CVD 死亡率风险。与随后 20 年内 CVD 死亡风险增加 2 倍以上相关的非致死性结局与试验期间死亡相结合,以创建 2 个新的复合结局。为每个复合结局估计了 SI/UC 的风险比和 95%置信区间。在 10 例试验期间的非致死性事件中,有 6 例(P<0.001)与 CVD 死亡风险增加 2 倍以上相关。经历了 CHD 复合结局(CHD 死亡、心肌梗死[临床或连续 ECG 改变]、心力衰竭或冠状动脉手术)的 SI 男性有 520 例,UC 男性有 602 例(SI/UC 风险比=0.86;95%置信区间,0.76-0.97;P=0.01)。经历了 CVD 复合结局(如上文所述的 CHD、其他 CVD 死亡、中风或肾功能损害)的 SI 男性有 581 例,UC 男性有 652 例(风险比=0.89;95%置信区间,0.79-0.99;P=0.04)。

结论

在事后分析中,SI 的 7 年内致命/非致命性 CHD 和 CVD 复合发生率明显低于 UC。这些发现强化了改善饮食/生活方式实践的建议,必要时采用药物治疗,以预防和控制主要 CVD 危险因素。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/b0a3/3541632/d7333fad4dc5/jah373-1-e003640-g1.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/b0a3/3541632/d7333fad4dc5/jah373-1-e003640-g1.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/b0a3/3541632/d7333fad4dc5/jah373-1-e003640-g1.jpg

相似文献

1
Multiple risk factor intervention trial revisited: a new perspective based on nonfatal and fatal composite endpoints, coronary and cardiovascular, during the trial.再次审视多项危险因素干预试验:基于试验期间非致死性和致死性复合终点、冠状动脉和心血管的新视角。
J Am Heart Assoc. 2012 Oct;1(5):e003640. doi: 10.1161/JAHA.112.003640. Epub 2012 Oct 25.
2
Coronary heart disease death, nonfatal acute myocardial infarction and other clinical outcomes in the Multiple Risk Factor Intervention Trial. Multiple Risk Factor Intervention Trial Research Group.多重危险因素干预试验中的冠心病死亡、非致死性急性心肌梗死及其他临床结局。多重危险因素干预试验研究组
Am J Cardiol. 1986 Jul 1;58(1):1-13. doi: 10.1016/0002-9149(86)90232-8.
3
Low-fat dietary pattern and risk of cardiovascular disease: the Women's Health Initiative Randomized Controlled Dietary Modification Trial.低脂饮食模式与心血管疾病风险:女性健康倡议随机对照饮食干预试验
JAMA. 2006 Feb 8;295(6):655-66. doi: 10.1001/jama.295.6.655.
4
Serum 25-hydroxyvitamin D and incidence of fatal and nonfatal cardiovascular events: a prospective study with repeated measurements.血清 25-羟维生素 D 与致死性和非致死性心血管事件的发生:一项具有重复测量的前瞻性研究。
J Clin Endocrinol Metab. 2013 Dec;98(12):4908-15. doi: 10.1210/jc.2013-2424. Epub 2013 Oct 8.
5
Mortality after 10 1/2 years for hypertensive participants in the Multiple Risk Factor Intervention Trial.多重危险因素干预试验中高血压参与者10.5年后的死亡率。
Circulation. 1990 Nov;82(5):1616-28. doi: 10.1161/01.cir.82.5.1616.
6
Prehypertension and incident acute coronary heart disease in the Reasons for Geographic and Racial Differences in Stroke (REGARDS) study.高血压前期与地理和种族差异在卒中研究(REGARDS)中的急性冠状动脉心脏病事件。
Am J Hypertens. 2014 Feb;27(2):245-51. doi: 10.1093/ajh/hpt200. Epub 2013 Nov 4.
7
A systematic review and economic evaluation of statins for the prevention of coronary events.他汀类药物预防冠状动脉事件的系统评价与经济学评估
Health Technol Assess. 2007 Apr;11(14):1-160, iii-iv. doi: 10.3310/hta11140.
8
Coronary heart disease and all-causes mortality in the Multiple Risk Factor Intervention Trial: subgroup findings and comparisons with other trials.多重危险因素干预试验中的冠心病与全因死亡率:亚组研究结果及与其他试验的比较
Prev Med. 1985 May;14(3):293-311. doi: 10.1016/0091-7435(85)90058-1.
9
A win ratio approach to the re-analysis of Multiple Risk Factor Intervention Trial.一种用于重新分析多重危险因素干预试验的胜率方法。
Clin Trials. 2019 Dec;16(6):626-634. doi: 10.1177/1740774519868233. Epub 2019 Aug 7.
10
Mortality after 16 years for participants randomized to the Multiple Risk Factor Intervention Trial.随机分配至多重危险因素干预试验的参与者16年后的死亡率。
Circulation. 1996 Sep 1;94(5):946-51. doi: 10.1161/01.cir.94.5.946.

引用本文的文献

1
Trajectories of self-reported hearing and their associations with cognition: evidence from the United Kingdom and United States of America.自报听力轨迹及其与认知的关联:来自英国和美国的证据。
Age Ageing. 2023 Feb 1;52(2). doi: 10.1093/ageing/afad017.
2
Hypertriglyceridemia: A Neglected Risk Factor for Ischemic Stroke?高甘油三酯血症:缺血性卒中被忽视的危险因素?
J Stroke. 2022 Jan;24(1):21-40. doi: 10.5853/jos.2021.02831. Epub 2022 Jan 31.
3
Low-Density Lipoprotein Cholesterol and Mortality in Patients With Intracerebral Hemorrhage in Taiwan.

本文引用的文献

1
Use of blood pressure lowering drugs in the prevention of cardiovascular disease: meta-analysis of 147 randomised trials in the context of expectations from prospective epidemiological studies.降压药物在心血管疾病预防中的应用:基于前瞻性流行病学研究预期的147项随机试验的荟萃分析
BMJ. 2009 May 19;338:b1665. doi: 10.1136/bmj.b1665.
2
Multiple-stage screening and mortality in the Multiple Risk Factor Intervention Trial.多重危险因素干预试验中的多阶段筛查与死亡率
Clin Trials. 2004;1(2):148-61. doi: 10.1191/1740774504cn018oa.
3
Composite outcomes in randomized trials: greater precision but with greater uncertainty?
台湾脑出血患者的低密度脂蛋白胆固醇与死亡率
Front Neurol. 2022 Jan 17;12:793471. doi: 10.3389/fneur.2021.793471. eCollection 2021.
4
Estimated Impact of Achieving Optimal Cardiovascular Health Among US Adults on Cardiovascular Disease Events.美国成年人实现心血管健康最佳状态对心血管疾病事件的预估影响。
J Am Heart Assoc. 2021 Apr 6;10(7):e019681. doi: 10.1161/JAHA.120.019681. Epub 2021 Mar 25.
5
Cardiovascular Health Score and Lifetime Risk of Cardiovascular Disease: The Cardiovascular Lifetime Risk Pooling Project.心血管健康评分与心血管疾病的终生风险:心血管终生风险汇总项目
Circ Cardiovasc Qual Outcomes. 2020 Jul;13(7):e006450. doi: 10.1161/CIRCOUTCOMES.119.006450. Epub 2020 Jun 30.
6
Association of rs2013208 SNP with serum lipid levels in two Chinese ethnic groups.两个中国民族群体中rs2013208单核苷酸多态性与血脂水平的关联
Int J Clin Exp Pathol. 2017 Aug 1;10(8):8520-8534. eCollection 2017.
7
Associations of Genetic Variations in and Lifestyle Factors with Coronary Artery Disease in a Southern Chinese Population with Dyslipidemia: A Nested Case-Control Study.载脂蛋白 E 基因多态性与生活方式因素在血脂异常的南方汉族人群冠心病发病中的相关性:巢式病例对照研究。
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2019 Mar 4;16(5):786. doi: 10.3390/ijerph16050786.
8
Age- and sex-related difference of lipid profile in patients with ischemic stroke in China.中国缺血性脑卒中患者血脂谱的年龄和性别差异
Medicine (Baltimore). 2018 Jun;97(23):e10930. doi: 10.1097/MD.0000000000010930.
9
The effects of interventions targeting multiple health behaviors on smoking cessation outcomes: a rapid realist review protocol.干预措施针对多种健康行为对戒烟效果的影响:快速务实综述方案。
Syst Rev. 2018 Mar 1;7(1):38. doi: 10.1186/s13643-018-0702-0.
10
Cardiovascular Health and Healthcare Utilization and Expenditures Among Medicare Beneficiaries: The REasons for Geographic And Racial Differences in Stroke (REGARDS) Study.医疗保险受益人的心血管健康、医疗服务利用及支出情况:中风地理和种族差异原因(REGARDS)研究
J Am Heart Assoc. 2017 Feb 1;6(2):e005106. doi: 10.1161/JAHA.116.005106.
随机试验中的复合结局:更高的精确性但伴随着更大的不确定性?
JAMA. 2003 May 21;289(19):2554-9. doi: 10.1001/jama.289.19.2554.
4
Age-specific relevance of usual blood pressure to vascular mortality: a meta-analysis of individual data for one million adults in 61 prospective studies.特定年龄的正常血压与血管性死亡率的相关性:对61项前瞻性研究中100万成年人个体数据的荟萃分析
Lancet. 2002 Dec 14;360(9349):1903-13. doi: 10.1016/s0140-6736(02)11911-8.
5
The Multiple Risk Factor Intervention Trial (MRFIT). A return to a landmark trial.多重危险因素干预试验(MRFIT)。回归一项具有里程碑意义的试验。
JAMA. 1997 Feb 19;277(7):595-7.
6
Mortality after 16 years for participants randomized to the Multiple Risk Factor Intervention Trial.随机分配至多重危险因素干预试验的参与者16年后的死亡率。
Circulation. 1996 Sep 1;94(5):946-51. doi: 10.1161/01.cir.94.5.946.
7
Risk factors for death from different types of stroke. Multiple Risk Factor Intervention Trial Research Group.不同类型中风的死亡风险因素。多重风险因素干预试验研究组。
Ann Epidemiol. 1993 Sep;3(5):493-9. doi: 10.1016/1047-2797(93)90103-b.
8
Multiple risk factor intervention trial. Risk factor changes and mortality results. Multiple Risk Factor Intervention Trial Research Group.多重危险因素干预试验。危险因素变化及死亡率结果。多重危险因素干预试验研究组。
JAMA. 1982 Sep 24;248(12):1465-77.
9
Multiple risk factor intervention trial (MRFIT).多重危险因素干预试验(MRFIT)。
Prev Med. 1981 Jul;10(4):501-18. doi: 10.1016/0091-7435(81)90062-1.
10
The multiple risk factor intervention trial (MRFIT). V. Intervention on smoking.多重危险因素干预试验(MRFIT)。五、吸烟干预。
Prev Med. 1981 Jul;10(4):476-500. doi: 10.1016/0091-7435(81)90061-x.