• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

随机分配至多重危险因素干预试验的参与者16年后的死亡率。

Mortality after 16 years for participants randomized to the Multiple Risk Factor Intervention Trial.

出版信息

Circulation. 1996 Sep 1;94(5):946-51. doi: 10.1161/01.cir.94.5.946.

DOI:10.1161/01.cir.94.5.946
PMID:8790030
Abstract

BACKGROUND

A mortality follow-up of 12,866 men was conducted 16 years after randomization to special intervention (SI) or usual care (UC) groups of the Multiple Risk Factor Intervention Trial to assess the long-term effect of cardiovascular risk factor intervention on coronary heart disease (CHD), cardiovascular death (CVD), and total mortality.

METHODS AND RESULTS

During the 7-year active-intervention phase of the trial, 6428 of the men were given dietary recommendations to lower blood cholesterol, antihypertensive drugs to lower blood pressure, and counseling for cigarette smoking cessation. The remaining 6438 men were referred to their usual source of medical care. After 16 years, 370 SI and 417 UC men had died from CHD, which represents an 11.4% lower mortality rate for SI versus UC men (95% CI, -23% to 1.9%). Results for total mortality followed a similar pattern; 991 SI and 1050 UC men had died by the end of follow-up (relative difference, -5.7%; 95% CI, -13% to 2.8%). For acute myocardial infarction, a subcategory of CHD, the relative difference was -20.4% (95% CI, -34.4% to -3.4%). Differences between SI and UC men in mortality rates from acute myocardial infarction, CHD, and all causes were greater during the posttrial follow-up period than during the trial.

CONCLUSIONS

Results of a 7-year multifactor intervention program aimed at lowering blood pressure and serum cholesterol and at cigarette smoking cessation among high-risk men give additional evidence of a long-term, continuing mortality benefit from the program.

摘要

背景

在多危险因素干预试验中,对12866名男性进行了随机分组,分为特殊干预组(SI)和常规护理组(UC),16年后进行死亡率随访,以评估心血管危险因素干预对冠心病(CHD)、心血管死亡(CVD)和总死亡率的长期影响。

方法与结果

在试验的7年积极干预阶段,6428名男性接受了降低血胆固醇的饮食建议、降低血压的抗高血压药物治疗以及戒烟咨询。其余6438名男性则被转介至其常规医疗保健机构。16年后,370名SI组男性和417名UC组男性死于冠心病,这表明SI组男性的死亡率比UC组男性低11.4%(95%CI,-23%至1.9%)。总死亡率的结果呈现类似模式;随访结束时,991名SI组男性和1050名UC组男性死亡(相对差异为-5.7%;95%CI,-13%至2.8%)。对于冠心病的一个亚类急性心肌梗死,相对差异为-20.4%(95%CI,-34.4%至-3.4%)。在试验后随访期间,SI组和UC组男性在急性心肌梗死、冠心病和所有原因导致的死亡率方面的差异比试验期间更大。

结论

一项为期7年的多因素干预计划,旨在降低高危男性的血压、血清胆固醇并帮助戒烟,该计划长期持续降低死亡率的额外证据得到了证实。

相似文献

1
Mortality after 16 years for participants randomized to the Multiple Risk Factor Intervention Trial.随机分配至多重危险因素干预试验的参与者16年后的死亡率。
Circulation. 1996 Sep 1;94(5):946-51. doi: 10.1161/01.cir.94.5.946.
2
Mortality after 10 1/2 years for hypertensive participants in the Multiple Risk Factor Intervention Trial.多重危险因素干预试验中高血压参与者10.5年后的死亡率。
Circulation. 1990 Nov;82(5):1616-28. doi: 10.1161/01.cir.82.5.1616.
3
Coronary heart disease death, nonfatal acute myocardial infarction and other clinical outcomes in the Multiple Risk Factor Intervention Trial. Multiple Risk Factor Intervention Trial Research Group.多重危险因素干预试验中的冠心病死亡、非致死性急性心肌梗死及其他临床结局。多重危险因素干预试验研究组
Am J Cardiol. 1986 Jul 1;58(1):1-13. doi: 10.1016/0002-9149(86)90232-8.
4
Lung cancer mortality after 16 years in MRFIT participants in intervention and usual-care groups. Multiple Risk Factor Intervention Trial.MRFIT研究中干预组和常规护理组参与者16年后的肺癌死亡率。多重危险因素干预试验。
Ann Epidemiol. 1997 Feb;7(2):125-36. doi: 10.1016/s1047-2797(96)00123-8.
5
Multiple risk factor intervention trial. Risk factor changes and mortality results. Multiple Risk Factor Intervention Trial Research Group.多重危险因素干预试验。危险因素变化及死亡率结果。多重危险因素干预试验研究组。
JAMA. 1982 Sep 24;248(12):1465-77.
6
Relationship between baseline risk factors and coronary heart disease and total mortality in the Multiple Risk Factor Intervention Trial. Multiple Risk Factor Intervention Trial Research Group.多危险因素干预试验中基线危险因素与冠心病及总死亡率的关系。多危险因素干预试验研究组
Prev Med. 1986 May;15(3):254-73. doi: 10.1016/0091-7435(86)90045-9.
7
Coronary heart disease and all-causes mortality in the Multiple Risk Factor Intervention Trial: subgroup findings and comparisons with other trials.多重危险因素干预试验中的冠心病与全因死亡率:亚组研究结果及与其他试验的比较
Prev Med. 1985 May;14(3):293-311. doi: 10.1016/0091-7435(85)90058-1.
8
Risk factor changes after cessation of intervention in the Multiple Risk Factor Intervention Trial. The MRFIT Research Group.多重危险因素干预试验中干预停止后的危险因素变化。MRFIT研究小组。
Prev Med. 1991 Mar;20(2):183-96. doi: 10.1016/0091-7435(91)90019-z.
9
Heart rate adjustment of exercise-induced ST-segment depression identifies men who benefit from a risk factor reduction program.运动诱发ST段压低的心率调整可识别出能从危险因素降低计划中获益的男性。
Circulation. 1997 Nov 4;96(9):2899-904. doi: 10.1161/01.cir.96.9.2899.
10
Baseline rest electrocardiographic abnormalities, antihypertensive treatment, and mortality in the Multiple Risk Factor Intervention Trial. Multiple Risk Factor Intervention Trial Research Group.多重危险因素干预试验中的基线静息心电图异常、抗高血压治疗与死亡率。多重危险因素干预试验研究组
Am J Cardiol. 1985 Jan 1;55(1):1-15. doi: 10.1016/0002-9149(85)90290-5.

引用本文的文献

1
ENGAGE and EMERGE: Truth and consequences?参与和浮现:真相与后果?
Alzheimers Dement. 2021 Apr;17(4):692-695. doi: 10.1002/alz.12286. Epub 2021 Mar 3.
2
Assessing Cardiovascular Risk in Patients with Diabetes: An Update.评估糖尿病患者的心血管风险:更新。
Curr Cardiol Rev. 2020;16(4):266-274. doi: 10.2174/1573403X15666191111123622.
3
Association of ABO blood groups with the severity of coronary artery disease: a cross-sectional study.ABO血型与冠状动脉疾病严重程度的关联:一项横断面研究。
J Geriatr Cardiol. 2019 Sep;16(9):701-705. doi: 10.11909/j.issn.1671-5411.2019.09.005.
4
Increased Mortality Despite Successful Multifactorial Cardiovascular Risk Reduction in Healthy Men: 40-Year Follow-Up of the Helsinki Businessmen Study Intervention Trial.尽管健康男性的多因素心血管风险降低取得了成功,但死亡率仍升高:赫尔辛基商人研究干预试验的 40 年随访结果。
J Nutr Health Aging. 2018;22(8):885-891. doi: 10.1007/s12603-018-1099-0.
5
The effects of interventions targeting multiple health behaviors on smoking cessation outcomes: a rapid realist review protocol.干预措施针对多种健康行为对戒烟效果的影响:快速务实综述方案。
Syst Rev. 2018 Mar 1;7(1):38. doi: 10.1186/s13643-018-0702-0.
6
The limitations of opportunistic epidemiology, pseudopod epidemiology.机遇性流行病学、伪足流行病学的局限性。
Eur J Epidemiol. 2016 Oct;31(10):957-966. doi: 10.1007/s10654-016-0196-9. Epub 2016 Sep 3.
7
Control of Blood Pressure and Risk Attenuation: Post Trial Follow-Up of Randomized Groups.血压控制与风险降低:随机分组的试验后随访
PLoS One. 2015 Nov 5;10(11):e0140550. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0140550. eCollection 2015.
8
Multiple risk factor intervention trial revisited: a new perspective based on nonfatal and fatal composite endpoints, coronary and cardiovascular, during the trial.再次审视多项危险因素干预试验:基于试验期间非致死性和致死性复合终点、冠状动脉和心血管的新视角。
J Am Heart Assoc. 2012 Oct;1(5):e003640. doi: 10.1161/JAHA.112.003640. Epub 2012 Oct 25.
9
Screening for coronary artery disease in patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus: An evidence-based review.2型糖尿病患者冠状动脉疾病的筛查:一项基于证据的综述。
Indian J Endocrinol Metab. 2012 Jan;16(1):94-101. doi: 10.4103/2230-8210.91202.
10
Relationships between cardiovascular disease risk factors and depressive symptoms as predictors of cardiovascular disease events in women.心血管疾病危险因素与抑郁症状之间的关系作为女性心血管疾病事件的预测因子。
J Womens Health (Larchmt). 2012 Feb;21(2):133-9. doi: 10.1089/jwh.2011.2787. Epub 2011 Oct 11.