Antell Nicholas B, Switzer Julie A, Schmidt Andrew H
From the Orthopaedic Trauma Institute, Department of Orthopaedics, University of California, San Francisco, CA (Dr. Antell) and the Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, University of Minnesota, Minneapolis, MN (Dr. Switzer and Dr. Schmidt).
J Am Acad Orthop Surg. 2017 Aug;25(8):577-585. doi: 10.5435/JAAOS-D-15-00510.
The incidence of acetabular fractures in the elderly population is increasing. Fractures in this population differ from those in younger patients, with more frequent involvement of the anterior column, more comminution, and more severe articular impaction in elderly patients. Although acetabular fractures in geriatric patients are more likely the result of low-energy trauma, outcomes are generally poorer than those in young patients. Multiple management options have been proposed, but no intervention has become the standard of care for these fractures in the elderly. Patient characteristics (eg, prior ambulation status, functional capacity, bone quality), the nature of the fracture, and the experience of the treating orthopaedic surgeon all must be considered when choosing among nonsurgical treatment, percutaneous fixation, open reduction and internal fixation, and immediate or delayed arthroplasty. Each treatment option has the potential for satisfactory results in properly selected patients.
老年人群髋臼骨折的发病率正在上升。该人群的骨折与年轻患者不同,老年患者前柱受累更频繁、骨折更粉碎且关节撞击更严重。尽管老年患者的髋臼骨折更可能是低能量创伤的结果,但总体预后通常比年轻患者差。已经提出了多种治疗方案,但尚无一种干预措施成为老年髋臼骨折的标准治疗方法。在选择非手术治疗、经皮固定、切开复位内固定以及一期或二期关节置换时,必须考虑患者特征(如既往行走状态、功能能力、骨质)、骨折性质以及骨科治疗医生的经验。每种治疗方案在合适的患者中都有可能取得满意的效果。