Cooper David K C, Pierson Richard N, Hering Bernhard J, Mohiuddin Muhammad M, Fishman Jay A, Denner Joachim, Ahn Curie, Azimzadeh Agnes M, Buhler Leo H, Cowan Peter J, Hawthorne Wayne J, Kobayashi Takaaki, Sachs David H
1 Thomas E Starzl Transplantation Institute, Department of Surgery, University of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, PA. 2 Division of Cardiac Surgery, Department of Surgery, University of Maryland, Baltimore VAMC, Baltimore, MD. 3 Schulze Diabetes Institute, Department of Surgery, University of Minnesota, Minneapolis, MN. 4 National Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute, National Institutes of Health, Bethesda, MD. 5 MGH Transplantation Center and Transplant Infectious Disease and Compromised Host Program, Massachusetts General Hospital/Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA. 6 Robert Koch Institute, Berlin, Germany. 7 Transplantation Research Institute, College of Medicine, Seoul National University, Seoul, South Korea. 8 Department of Surgery, University Hospital Geneva, Geneva, Switzerland. 9 Immunology Research Center, St Vincent's Hospital Melbourne, University of Melbourne, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia. 10 Department of Surgery, Westmead Clinical School, University of Sydney, Westmead Hospital, Westmead, New South Wales, Australia. 11 Department of Renal Transplant Surgery, Aichi Medical University School of Medicine, Nagakute, Japan. 12 Columbia University Medical Center, New York, NY.
Transplantation. 2017 Aug;101(8):1766-1769. doi: 10.1097/TP.0000000000001683.
The continual critical shortage of organs and cells from deceased human donors has stimulated research in the field of cross-species transplantation (xenotransplantation), with the pig selected as the most suitable potential source of organs. Since the US Food and Drug Administration concluded a comprehensive review of xenotransplantation in 2003, considerable progress has been made in the experimental laboratory to improve cell and organ xenograft survival in several pig-to-nonhuman primate systems that offer the best available models to predict clinical outcomes. Survival of heart, kidney, and islet grafts in nonhuman primates is now being measured in months or even years. The potential risks associated with xenotransplantation, for example, the transfer of an infectious microorganism, that were highlighted in the 2003 Food and Drug Administration guidance and subsequent World Health Organization consensus documents have been carefully studied and shown to be either less likely than previously thought or readily manageable by donor selection or recipient management strategies. In this context, we suggest that the national regulatory authorities worldwide should re-examine their guidelines and regulations regarding xenotransplantation, so as to better enable design and conduct of safe and informative clinical trials of cell and organ xenotransplantation when and as supported by the preclinical data. We identify specific topics that we suggest require reconsideration.
来自已故人类供体的器官和细胞持续严重短缺,这刺激了跨物种移植(异种移植)领域的研究,猪被选为最适合的潜在器官来源。自美国食品药品监督管理局(US Food and Drug Administration)在2003年完成对异种移植的全面审查以来,实验室内已取得了相当大的进展,以提高细胞和器官异种移植在几种猪到非人灵长类动物系统中的存活率,这些系统提供了预测临床结果的最佳可用模型。现在,在非人灵长类动物中,心脏、肾脏和胰岛移植物的存活时间以月甚至年为单位来衡量。2003年美国食品药品监督管理局指南及随后世界卫生组织共识文件中强调的与异种移植相关的潜在风险,例如传染性微生物的传播,已得到仔细研究,并表明其发生可能性低于先前预期,或者通过供体选择或受体管理策略易于控制。在此背景下,我们建议全球各国监管机构重新审视其关于异种移植的指导方针和法规,以便在临床前数据支持时,更好地开展安全且信息充分的细胞和器官异种移植临床试验。我们确定了一些建议重新考虑的具体主题。