Suppr超能文献

赌博障碍中的安慰剂效应及其临床关联。

The placebo effect and its clinical associations in gambling disorder.

作者信息

Grant Jon E, Chamberlain Samuel R

机构信息

Department of Psychiatry and Behavioral Neuroscience, University of Chicago, Pritzker School of Medicine, Chicago, IL, USA E-mail:

出版信息

Ann Clin Psychiatry. 2017 Aug;29(3):167-172.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

Although gambling disorder is prevalent and functionally impairing, no FDA-approved medications exist for its treatment. The ability of clinical trials to detect the benefits of active treatment has been hindered by an unusually high placebo response. Virtually nothing is known about baseline clinical characteristics that might predict placebo response in those with gambling disorder.

METHODS

Participants (N = 152) assigned to placebo were pooled from multiple double-blind trials of gambling disorder. Participants were classified as placebo responders or non-responders based on a cut-off of 35% reduction in symptom severity on the Gambling Symptom Assessment Scale. Baseline group differences were characterized using t tests and equivalent non-parametric tests as appropriate.

RESULTS

Fifty-one percent of individuals assigned to placebo showed a significant clinical response. Compared with non-responders, placebo responders remained in treatment for significantly longer, were more likely to report "enjoyment" as a trigger for gambling, and were less likely to state that "boredom" or "loneliness" triggered their gambling. Placebo responders and non-responders did not differ significantly in age, sex, age at symptom onset, baseline symptom severity, comorbidities, or likelihood of having received a previous treatment.

CONCLUSIONS

Predictors of placebo response for gambling disorder appear markedly different from those reported for other mental illnesses.

摘要

背景

尽管赌博障碍很常见且会造成功能损害,但尚无美国食品药品监督管理局(FDA)批准用于治疗该疾病的药物。临床试验检测积极治疗益处的能力受到异常高的安慰剂反应的阻碍。对于可能预测赌博障碍患者安慰剂反应的基线临床特征,人们几乎一无所知。

方法

从多项赌博障碍双盲试验中汇总分配到安慰剂组的参与者(N = 152)。根据赌博症状评估量表上症状严重程度降低35%的临界值,将参与者分为安慰剂反应者或无反应者。使用t检验和适当的等效非参数检验来描述基线组间差异。

结果

分配到安慰剂组的个体中有51%显示出显著的临床反应。与无反应者相比,安慰剂反应者接受治疗的时间明显更长,更有可能报告“享受”是赌博的触发因素,而不太可能表示“无聊”或“孤独”是其赌博的触发因素。安慰剂反应者和无反应者在年龄、性别、症状发作年龄、基线症状严重程度、合并症或既往接受治疗的可能性方面没有显著差异。

结论

赌博障碍安慰剂反应的预测因素似乎与其他精神疾病所报告的预测因素明显不同。

相似文献

2
Placebo response in trichotillomania.拔毛癖中的安慰剂反应。
Int Clin Psychopharmacol. 2017 Nov;32(6):350-355. doi: 10.1097/YIC.0000000000000185.

本文引用的文献

4
Genetics and the placebo effect: the placebome.遗传学与安慰剂效应:安慰剂组学
Trends Mol Med. 2015 May;21(5):285-94. doi: 10.1016/j.molmed.2015.02.009. Epub 2015 Apr 14.
8
Predictors of placebo response in bipolar depression.双相抑郁中安慰剂反应的预测因素。
Int Clin Psychopharmacol. 2015 Mar;30(2):59-66. doi: 10.1097/YIC.0000000000000058.
9
Obesity and gambling: neurocognitive and clinical associations.肥胖与赌博:神经认知及临床关联
Acta Psychiatr Scand. 2015 May;131(5):379-86. doi: 10.1111/acps.12353. Epub 2014 Oct 23.

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验