Santana Orlando, Xydas Steve, Williams Roy F, La Pietra Angelo, Mawad Maurice, Behrens Vicente, Escolar Esteban, Mihos Christos G
Division of Cardiology, The Columbia University, Mount Sinai Heart Institute, Miami Beach, USA.
Division of Cardiac Surgery, Mount Sinai Heart Institute, Miami Beach, USA.
J Thorac Dis. 2017 Jun;9(Suppl 7):S607-S613. doi: 10.21037/jtd.2017.06.32.
We evaluated the outcomes of patients with aortic valve pathology in the setting of a left ventricular ejection fraction ≤35% who underwent minimally invasive aortic valve replacement (AVR), with or without concomitant mitral valve (MV) surgery.
All minimally invasive AVR in patients with a left ventricular ejection fraction ≤35%, performed via a right thoracotomy for aortic stenosis or regurgitation between January 2009 and March 2013, were retrospectively evaluated. The operative characteristics, perioperative outcomes, and 30-day mortality were analyzed.
There were 75 patients identified: 51 who underwent isolated AVR, and 24 who had combined AVR plus MV surgery for moderate to severe mitral regurgitation. In patients undergoing MV surgery, there were 22 (91.7%) MV repairs [ring annuloplasty =7 (37.5%), transaortic edge-to-edge repair =15 (62.5%)], and 2 (8.3%) replacements. No patient required conversion to sternotomy for inadequate surgical field exposure. The median total mechanical ventilation time and intensive care unit length of stay were 14 (IQR, 8-20) and 42 hours (IQR, 26-93 hours) in the isolated AVR group, and 16.5 hours (IQR, 12-61.5 hours) and 95.5 hours (IQR, 43.5-159 hours) in the AVR plus MV surgery group, respectively. The most common post-operative complication was new-onset atrial fibrillation, which occurred in 15 (29.4%) isolated AVR and 4 (16.7%) AVR plus MV surgery patients. The median hospital length of stay and 30-day mortality was 7 days (IQR, 5-12 days) and 1 (2%) in the isolated AVR group, and 10.5 days (IQR, 5-21 days) and 1 (4.3%) for AVR plus MV surgery.
In patients with aortic valve pathology in the setting of a left ventricular ejection fraction ≤35%, minimally invasive AVR can be performed, with or without concomitant MV surgery, with a low morbidity and mortality.
我们评估了左心室射血分数≤35%的主动脉瓣病变患者接受微创主动脉瓣置换术(AVR)的结局,这些患者同时接受或未接受二尖瓣(MV)手术。
对2009年1月至2013年3月期间通过右胸切口因主动脉瓣狭窄或反流接受左心室射血分数≤35%的患者进行的所有微创AVR进行回顾性评估。分析手术特征、围手术期结局和30天死亡率。
共确定75例患者:51例行单纯AVR,24例因中度至重度二尖瓣反流行AVR联合MV手术。在接受MV手术的患者中,22例(91.7%)行MV修复[环成形术=7例(37.5%),经主动脉缘对缘修复=15例(62.5%)],2例(8.3%)行置换术。没有患者因手术视野暴露不足而需要转为胸骨切开术。单纯AVR组的总机械通气时间中位数和重症监护病房住院时间分别为[14(四分位间距,8 - 20)]小时和42小时(四分位间距,26 - 93小时),AVR联合MV手术组分别为16.5小时(四分位间距,12 - 61.5小时)和95.5小时(四分位间距,43.5 - 159小时)。最常见的术后并发症是新发房颤,15例(29.4%)单纯AVR患者和4例(16.7%)AVR联合MV手术患者发生。单纯AVR组的住院时间中位数和30天死亡率分别为7天(四分位间距,5 - 12天)和1例(2%),AVR联合MV手术组分别为10.5天(四分位间距,5 - 21天)和1例(4.3%)。
对于左心室射血分数≤35%的主动脉瓣病变患者,无论是否同时进行MV手术,均可进行微创AVR,且发病率和死亡率较低。