Patnaik Santosh K, Kannisto Eric D, Mallick Reema, Vachani Anil, Yendamuri Sai
Department of Thoracic Surgery, Roswell Park Cancer Institute, Buffalo, New York, United States of America.
Department of Surgery, State University of New York, Buffalo, New York, United States of America.
PLoS One. 2017 Jul 25;12(7):e0181926. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0181926. eCollection 2017.
At least seven studies have suggested that microRNA levels in whole blood can be diagnostic for lung cancer. We conducted a large bi-institutional study to validate this. Qiagen® PAXgene™ Blood miRNA System was used to collect blood and extract RNA from it for 85 pathologic stage I-IV non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) cases and 76 clinically-relevant controls who had a benign pulmonary mass, or a high risk of developing lung cancer because of a history of cigarette smoking or age >60 years. Cases and controls were similar for age, gender, race, and blood hemoglobin and leukocyte but not platelet levels (0.23 and 0.26 million/μl, respectively; t test P = 0.01). Exiqon® MiRCURY™ microarrays were used to quantify microRNAs in RNA isolates. Quantification was also performed using Taqman™ microRNA reverse transcription (RT)-PCR assays for five microRNAs whose lung cancer-diagnostic potential had been suggested in seven published studies. Of the 1,941 human mature microRNAs detectable with the microarray platform, 598 (31%) were identified as expressed and reliably quantified among the study's subjects. However, none of the microRNAs was differentially expressed between cases and controls (P >0.05 at false discovery rate <5% in test using empirical Bayes-moderated t statistics). In classification analyses with leave-one-out internal cross-validation, cases and controls could be identified by microRNA expression with 47% and 50% accuracy with support vector machines and top-scoring pair methods, respectively. Cases and controls did not differ for RT-PCR-based measurements of any of the five microRNAs whose biomarker potential had been suggested by seven previous studies. Additionally, no difference for microRNA expression was noticed in microarray-based microRNA profiles of whole blood of 12 stage IA-IIIB NSCLC cases before and three-four weeks after tumor resection. These findings show that whole blood microRNA expression profiles lack diagnostic value for high-risk screening of NSCLC, though such value may exist for selective sub-groups of NSCLC and control populations.
至少有七项研究表明,全血中的微小RNA水平可用于诊断肺癌。我们进行了一项大型双机构研究以对此进行验证。使用Qiagen® PAXgene™血液miRNA系统采集血液并从中提取RNA,研究对象包括85例病理分期为I - IV期的非小细胞肺癌(NSCLC)患者以及76名临床相关对照,后者患有良性肺部肿块,或因吸烟史或年龄> 60岁而有患肺癌的高风险。病例组和对照组在年龄、性别、种族、血血红蛋白和白细胞方面相似,但血小板水平不同(分别为0.23和0.26百万/μl;t检验P = 0.01)。使用Exiqon® MiRCURY™微阵列对RNA分离物中的微小RNA进行定量。还使用Taqman™微小RNA逆转录(RT)-PCR测定法对七种已发表研究中提示具有肺癌诊断潜力的五种微小RNA进行了定量。在微阵列平台可检测的1941种人类成熟微小RNA中,有598种(31%)在研究对象中被鉴定为有表达且可可靠定量。然而,病例组和对照组之间没有微小RNA差异表达(在使用经验贝叶斯调节t统计量的检验中,错误发现率< 5%时P > 0.05)。在留一法内部交叉验证的分类分析中,使用支持向量机和最高得分对方法,分别以47%和50%的准确率通过微小RNA表达来鉴别病例组和对照组。在先前七项研究提示具有生物标志物潜力的五种微小RNA中,基于RT-PCR的测量在病例组和对照组之间没有差异。此外,在12例IA - IIIB期NSCLC患者肿瘤切除前和切除后三至四周的全血微阵列微小RNA谱中,未发现微小RNA表达有差异。这些发现表明,全血微小RNA表达谱对NSCLC的高危筛查缺乏诊断价值,尽管对于NSCLC和对照人群的选择性亚组可能存在这种价值。