• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

内镜逆行胰胆管造影术后胰腺炎中“七月效应”的评估:全国住院患者样本

Assessment of the July effect in post-endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography pancreatitis: Nationwide Inpatient Sample.

作者信息

Schulman Allison R, Abougergi Marwan S, Thompson Christopher C

机构信息

Allison R Schulman, Christopher C Thompson, Division of Gastroenterology, Hepatology and Endoscopy, Brigham and Women's Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA 02115, United States.

出版信息

World J Gastrointest Endosc. 2017 Jul 16;9(7):296-303. doi: 10.4253/wjge.v9.i7.296.

DOI:10.4253/wjge.v9.i7.296
PMID:28744341
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC5507820/
Abstract

AIM

To assess incidence of post-endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography (post-ERCP) pancreatitis in the early (July/August/September) the late (April/May/June) academic year and evaluate in-hospital mortality, length of stay (LOS), and total hospitalization charge between these time periods.

METHODS

This was a retrospective cohort study using the 2012 Nationwide Inpatient Sample (NIS). Patients with International Classification of Diseases, 9 Revision, Clinical Modification (ICD-9 CM) procedure codes for ERCP were included. Patients were excluded from the study if they had an ICD-9 CM code for a principal diagnosis of acute pancreatitis, if the ERCP was performed before or on the day of admission or if they were admitted to non-teaching hospitals. Post-ERCP pancreatitis was defined as an ICD-9 CM code for a secondary diagnosis of acute pancreatitis in patients who received an ERCP as delineated above. ERCPs performed during the months of July, August and September was compared to those performed in April, May and June in academic hospitals. ERCPs performed at academic hospitals during the early late year were compared. Primary outcome was incidence of post-ERCP pancreatitis. Secondary outcomes included in-hospital mortality, length of stay (LOS), and total hospitalization charge. Proportions were compared using fisher's exact test and continuous variables using student -test. Multivariable regression was performed.

RESULTS

From the 36480032 hospitalizations in 2012 in the United States, 6248 were included in the study (3065 in July/August/September and 3183 in April/May/June) in the 2012 academic year. Compared with patients admitted in July/August/September, patients admitted in April/May/June had no statistical difference in all variables including mean age, percent female, Charleston comorbidity index, race, median income, and hospital characteristics including region, bed size, and location. Incidence of post-ERCP pancreatitis in early late academic year were not statistically significant (OR = 1.03, 95%CI: 0.71-1.51, = 0.415). Similarly, the adjusted odds ratio of mortality, LOS, and total hospitalization charge in early compared to late academic year were not statistically significant.

CONCLUSION

Incidence of post-ERCP pancreatitis does not differ at academic institutions depending on the time of year. Similarly, mortality, LOS, and total hospital charge do not demonstrate the existence of a temporal effect, suggesting that trainee level of experience does not impact clinical outcomes in patients undergoing ERCP.

摘要

目的

评估学年早期(7月/8月/9月)和晚期(4月/5月/6月)内镜逆行胰胆管造影术后(ERCP术后)胰腺炎的发生率,并评估这两个时间段内的住院死亡率、住院时间(LOS)和总住院费用。

方法

这是一项使用2012年全国住院患者样本(NIS)的回顾性队列研究。纳入具有国际疾病分类第9版临床修订本(ICD-9 CM)ERCP手术编码的患者。如果患者的主要诊断为急性胰腺炎的ICD-9 CM编码、ERCP在入院前或入院当天进行,或者他们入住非教学医院,则将其排除在研究之外。ERCP术后胰腺炎定义为上述接受ERCP治疗的患者中急性胰腺炎二级诊断的ICD-9 CM编码。将7月、8月和9月进行的ERCP与学术医院4月、5月和6月进行的ERCP进行比较。比较学年早期和晚期在学术医院进行的ERCP。主要结局是ERCP术后胰腺炎的发生率。次要结局包括住院死亡率、住院时间(LOS)和总住院费用。使用Fisher精确检验比较比例,使用学生t检验比较连续变量。进行多变量回归分析。

结果

在2012年美国的36480032次住院治疗中,2012学年有6248例纳入研究(7月/8月/9月为3065例,4月/5月/6月为3183例)。与7月/8月/9月入院的患者相比,4月/5月/6月入院的患者在所有变量上均无统计学差异,包括平均年龄、女性百分比、Charleston合并症指数、种族、收入中位数以及医院特征,包括地区、床位规模和位置。学年早期和晚期ERCP术后胰腺炎的发生率无统计学意义(OR = 1.03,95%CI:0.71 - 1.51,P = 0.415)。同样,与学年晚期相比,学年早期死亡率、住院时间(LOS)和总住院费用的调整优势比也无统计学意义。

结论

在学术机构中,ERCP术后胰腺炎的发生率不因一年中的时间而异。同样,死亡率、住院时间(LOS)和总住院费用也未显示出时间效应的存在,这表明实习医生的经验水平不会影响接受ERCP治疗患者的临床结局。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/37c0/5507820/ca1e30e1753d/WJGE-9-296-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/37c0/5507820/ca1e30e1753d/WJGE-9-296-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/37c0/5507820/ca1e30e1753d/WJGE-9-296-g001.jpg

相似文献

1
Assessment of the July effect in post-endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography pancreatitis: Nationwide Inpatient Sample.内镜逆行胰胆管造影术后胰腺炎中“七月效应”的评估:全国住院患者样本
World J Gastrointest Endosc. 2017 Jul 16;9(7):296-303. doi: 10.4253/wjge.v9.i7.296.
2
A Nationwide Assessment of the "July Effect" and Predictors of Post-Endoscopic Retrograde Cholangiopancreatography Sepsis at Urban Teaching Hospitals in the United States.美国城市教学医院对“七月效应”及内镜逆行胰胆管造影术后脓毒症预测因素的全国性评估。
Clin Endosc. 2019 Sep;52(5):486-496. doi: 10.5946/ce.2018.190. Epub 2019 May 27.
3
End-stage renal disease is associated with increased post endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography adverse events in hospitalized patients.终末期肾病与住院患者内镜逆行胰胆管造影术后不良事件增加有关。
World J Gastroenterol. 2018 Nov 7;24(41):4691-4697. doi: 10.3748/wjg.v24.i41.4691.
4
Evaluation of socioeconomic and healthcare disparities on same admission cholecystectomy after endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography among patients with acute gallstone pancreatitis.评估急性胆石性胰腺炎患者内镜逆行胰胆管造影术后同次入院行胆囊切除术的社会经济和医疗保健差异。
Surg Endosc. 2022 Jan;36(1):274-281. doi: 10.1007/s00464-020-08272-2. Epub 2021 Jan 22.
5
Outcomes and Utilization of Therapeutic Hypothermia in Post-Cardiac Arrest Patients in Teaching Versus Non-Teaching Hospitals: Retrospective Study of the Nationwide Inpatient Sample Database (2016).教学医院与非教学医院心脏骤停后患者治疗性低温的结局与应用:基于全国住院患者样本数据库(2016年)的回顾性研究
Cureus. 2020 Aug 4;12(8):e9545. doi: 10.7759/cureus.9545.
6
Racial disparities in endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography (ERCP) utilization in the United States: are we getting better?美国内镜逆行胰胆管造影术(ERCP)利用中的种族差异:我们是否有所改善?
Surg Endosc. 2023 Jan;37(1):421-433. doi: 10.1007/s00464-022-09535-w. Epub 2022 Aug 19.
7
The impact of COVID-19 on hospitalizations that underwent endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography in the United States.2019年冠状病毒病对美国接受内镜逆行胰胆管造影术住院治疗的影响。
Surg Endosc. 2024 Jan;38(1):202-211. doi: 10.1007/s00464-023-10529-5. Epub 2023 Nov 13.
8
Clinical outcomes and predictors for 30-day readmissions of endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography in the United States.美国内镜逆行胰胆管造影术 30 天再入院的临床结果和预测因素。
J Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2024 Jan;39(1):141-148. doi: 10.1111/jgh.16362. Epub 2023 Sep 24.
9
Trend and Predictors of the Utilization of Endoscopic Retrograde Cholangiopancreatography in Acute Pancreatitis Hospitalizations.急性胰腺炎住院患者内镜逆行胰胆管造影术使用情况的趋势及预测因素
Cureus. 2020 Nov 10;12(11):e11420. doi: 10.7759/cureus.11420.
10
ERCP improves mortality in acute biliary pancreatitis without cholangitis.内镜逆行胰胆管造影术(ERCP)可降低无胆管炎的急性胆源性胰腺炎的死亡率。
Endosc Int Open. 2021 Jun;9(6):E927-E933. doi: 10.1055/a-1320-0041. Epub 2021 May 27.

引用本文的文献

1
Impact of atrial fibrillation on in-hospital outcomes following endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography: a propensity score-matched analysis of the National Inpatient Sample (2016-2020).心房颤动对内镜逆行胰胆管造影术后住院结局的影响:一项基于国家住院样本(2016 - 2020年)的倾向评分匹配分析
Ann Gastroenterol. 2025 May-Jun;38(3):345-352. doi: 10.20524/aog.2025.0964. Epub 2025 Apr 25.
2
July effect in clinical outcomes of esophagogastroduodenoscopy performed at teaching hospitals in the United States.美国教学医院进行的食管胃十二指肠镜检查临床结果中的“七月效应”
Proc (Bayl Univ Med Cent). 2023 May 8;36(4):478-482. doi: 10.1080/08998280.2023.2204804. eCollection 2023.
3

本文引用的文献

1
Preventing post-endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography pancreatitis: what can be done?预防内镜逆行胰胆管造影术后胰腺炎:能做些什么?
World J Gastroenterol. 2015 Jan 28;21(4):1069-80. doi: 10.3748/wjg.v21.i4.1069.
2
Risk factors for post-ERCP pancreatitis: A systematic review and meta-analysis.内镜逆行胰胆管造影术后胰腺炎的危险因素:一项系统评价与Meta分析
Surgeon. 2015 Aug;13(4):218-29. doi: 10.1016/j.surge.2014.11.005. Epub 2014 Dec 24.
3
"July effect": impact of the academic year-end changeover on patient outcomes: a systematic review.
Timing of endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography in acute biliary pancreatitis without cholangitis: a nationwide inpatient cohort study.
无胆管炎的急性胆源性胰腺炎行内镜逆行胰胆管造影术的时机:一项全国性住院患者队列研究
Ann Gastroenterol. 2021 Jul-Aug;34(4):575-581. doi: 10.20524/aog.2021.0615. Epub 2021 Feb 26.
4
Predictors of postendoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography pancreatitis, analysis of more than half a million procedures performed nationwide over the last 15 years.内镜逆行胰胆管造影术后胰腺炎的预测因素:对过去15年全国范围内超过50万例手术的分析
JGH Open. 2020 Apr 17;4(4):736-742. doi: 10.1002/jgh3.12341. eCollection 2020 Aug.
5
Trends in Morbidity and Mortality Following Colectomy Among Patients with Ulcerative Colitis in the Biologic Era (2002-2013): A Study Using the National Inpatient Sample.生物制剂时代溃疡性结肠炎患者结肠切除术后发病率和死亡率的趋势(2002-2013 年):一项利用国家住院患者样本的研究。
Dig Dis Sci. 2021 Jun;66(6):2032-2041. doi: 10.1007/s10620-020-06474-1. Epub 2020 Jul 16.
6
Air embolism secondary to endoscopy in hospitalized patients: results from the National Inpatient Sample (1998-2013).住院患者内镜检查继发空气栓塞:来自全国住院患者样本(1998 - 2013年)的结果
Ann Gastroenterol. 2019 Sep-Oct;32(5):476-481. doi: 10.20524/aog.2019.0401. Epub 2019 Jul 17.
7
Is the July Effect Real in Patients Undergoing Endoscopic Retrograde Cholangiopancreatography?内镜逆行胰胆管造影术患者中存在“七月效应”吗?
Clin Endosc. 2019 Sep;52(5):399-400. doi: 10.5946/ce.2019.132. Epub 2019 Jul 25.
8
A Nationwide Assessment of the "July Effect" and Predictors of Post-Endoscopic Retrograde Cholangiopancreatography Sepsis at Urban Teaching Hospitals in the United States.美国城市教学医院对“七月效应”及内镜逆行胰胆管造影术后脓毒症预测因素的全国性评估。
Clin Endosc. 2019 Sep;52(5):486-496. doi: 10.5946/ce.2018.190. Epub 2019 May 27.
9
Does "July effect" exist in colonoscopies performed at teaching hospitals?教学医院进行的结肠镜检查中存在“七月效应”吗?
Transl Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2018 May 17;3:28. doi: 10.21037/tgh.2018.05.04. eCollection 2018.
“七月效应”:学年末交接对患者结局的影响:系统评价。
Ann Intern Med. 2011 Sep 6;155(5):309-15. doi: 10.7326/0003-4819-155-5-201109060-00354. Epub 2011 Jul 11.
4
European Society of Gastrointestinal Endoscopy, European Society of Gastroenterology and Endoscopy Nurses and Associates, and the European Society of Anaesthesiology Guideline: Non-anaesthesiologist administration of propofol for GI endoscopy.欧洲胃肠道内镜学会、欧洲胃肠病学和内镜护士协会以及欧洲麻醉学会指南:非麻醉医师管理胃肠道内镜检查用丙泊酚。
Eur J Anaesthesiol. 2010 Dec;27(12):1016-30. doi: 10.1097/EJA.0b013e32834136bf.
5
A July spike in fatal medication errors: a possible effect of new medical residents.7月致命用药错误激增:新入职住院医师可能带来的影响。
J Gen Intern Med. 2010 Aug;25(8):774-9. doi: 10.1007/s11606-010-1356-3. Epub 2010 May 29.
6
Do hospitalists affect clinical outcomes and efficiency for patients with acute upper gastrointestinal hemorrhage (UGIH)?内科住院医师是否会影响急性上消化道出血(UGIH)患者的临床结局和效率?
J Hosp Med. 2010 Mar;5(3):133-9. doi: 10.1002/jhm.612.
7
Hip fracture outcome: is there a "July effect"?髋部骨折结局:是否存在“七月效应”?
Am J Orthop (Belle Mead NJ). 2009 Dec;38(12):606-11.
8
Rate of undesirable events at beginning of academic year: retrospective cohort study.学年开始时不良事件发生率:回顾性队列研究。
BMJ. 2009 Oct 13;339:b3974. doi: 10.1136/bmj.b3974.
9
Early in-hospital mortality following trainee doctors' first day at work.实习医生上岗第一天的院内早期死亡率。
PLoS One. 2009 Sep 23;4(9):e7103. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0007103.
10
The July effect: impact of the beginning of the academic cycle on cardiac surgical outcomes in a cohort of 70,616 patients.七月效应:学术周期开始对70616例患者队列心脏手术结局的影响。
Ann Thorac Surg. 2009 Jul;88(1):70-5. doi: 10.1016/j.athoracsur.2009.04.022.