Department of Sociology, Bielefeld University, P.O. Box 10 01 31, D-33501, Bielefeld, Germany.
GESIS Training, GESIS - Leibniz Institute for Social Sciences, Unter Sachsenhausen 6-8, 50667, Köln, Germany.
J Youth Adolesc. 2017 Oct;46(10):2194-2214. doi: 10.1007/s10964-017-0718-0. Epub 2017 Jul 25.
Educational attainment in adolescence is of paramount importance for attaining higher education and for shaping subsequent life chances. Sociological accounts focus on the role of differences in socioeconomic resources in intergenerational reproduction of educational inequalities. These often disregard the intergenerational transmission of cognitive ability and the importance of children's cognitive ability to educational attainment. Psychological perspectives stress the importance of cognitive ability for educational attainment but underemphasize potentially different roles of specific socioeconomic resources in shaping educational outcomes, as well as individual differences in cognitive ability. By integrating two strands of research, a clearer picture of the pathways linking the family of origin, cognitive ability, and early educational outcomes can be reached. Using the population-based TwinLife study in Germany, we investigated multidimensional pathways linking parental socioeconomic position to their children's cognitive ability and academic track attendance in the secondary school. The sample included twins (N = 4008), respectively ages 11 and 17, and siblings (N = 801). We observed strong genetic influences on cognitive ability, whereas shared environmental influences were much more important for academic tracking. In multilevel analyses, separate dimensions of socioeconomic resources influenced child cognitive ability, controlling parental cognitive ability. Controlling adolescent cognitive ability and parental cognitive ability, parental socioeconomic resources also directly affected track attendance. This indicated that it is crucial to investigate the intertwined influences on educational outcomes in adolescence of both cognitive ability and the characteristics of the family of origin.
青少年时期的教育程度对获得高等教育和塑造未来的人生机会至关重要。社会学的解释侧重于社会经济资源差异在代际教育不平等中的作用。这些往往忽略了认知能力的代际传递以及儿童认知能力对教育成就的重要性。心理学观点强调了认知能力对教育成就的重要性,但对特定社会经济资源在塑造教育成果方面的潜在不同作用以及认知能力的个体差异重视不够。通过整合两项研究,可以更清楚地了解将出身家庭、认知能力和早期教育成果联系起来的途径。我们使用基于人群的德国 TwinLife 研究,调查了将父母的社会经济地位与他们孩子的认知能力和中学学术成绩联系起来的多维途径。样本包括双胞胎(N=4008),年龄分别为 11 岁和 17 岁,以及兄弟姐妹(N=801)。我们观察到认知能力受到强烈的遗传影响,而共享环境影响对学术跟踪更为重要。在多层次分析中,控制父母认知能力后,社会经济资源的不同维度会影响儿童的认知能力。控制青少年认知能力和父母认知能力后,父母的社会经济资源也直接影响成绩跟踪。这表明,调查青少年时期认知能力和出身家庭特征对教育成果的相互影响至关重要。