• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

一项旨在减少学龄儿童传染病、改善卫生状况和健康水平的多组分干预措施的过程评估:“嗨,五”研究

Process evaluation of a multi-component intervention to reduce infectious diseases and improve hygiene and well-being among school children: the Hi Five study.

作者信息

Bonnesen C T, Plauborg R, Denbæk A M, Due P, Johansen A

机构信息

Centre for Intervention Research in Health Promotion and Disease Prevention, National Institute of Public Health, University of Southern Denmark, DK-1353 Copenhagen K, Denmark and The National Board of Social Services, Office of Children and Families, DK-1119 Copenhagen K, Denmark

Centre for Intervention Research in Health Promotion and Disease Prevention, National Institute of Public Health, University of Southern Denmark, DK-1353 Copenhagen K, Denmark and The National Board of Social Services, Office of Children and Families, DK-1119 Copenhagen K, Denmark.

出版信息

Health Educ Res. 2015 Jun;30(3):497-512. doi: 10.1093/her/cyv019. Epub 2015 May 11.

DOI:10.1093/her/cyv019
PMID:25964369
Abstract

The Hi Five study was a three-armed cluster randomized controlled trial designed to reduce infections and improve hygiene and well-being among pupils. Participating schools (n = 43) were randomized into either control (n = 15) or one of two intervention groups (n = 28). The intervention consisted of three components: (i) a curriculum (ii) mandatory daily hand washing before lunch (iii) extra cleaning of school toilets. The aim of this study was to evaluate the implementation and to identify challenges to program implementation. Several data sources were used, including observations of school toilets, semi-structured interviews with school coordinators (n = 4), focus groups with pupils (n = 6) and teachers (n = 5), and questionnaires among pupils (n = 5440), teachers (n = 387) and school coordinators (n = 28). This study indicates that the curriculum was successfully implemented at most schools, and that teachers and pupils reacted positively to this part of the intervention. However, daily hand washing before lunch seems to be difficult to implement. Overall, the implementation process was affected by several factors such as poor sanitary facilities, lack of time and prioritization and objections against the increasing tendency to place the responsibility for child-rearing tasks on schools. This study reveals the strong and weak parts of the Hi Five study and can guide program improvement.

摘要

“嗨,五”研究是一项三臂整群随机对照试验,旨在减少学生感染并改善卫生状况和健康水平。参与研究的学校(n = 43)被随机分为对照组(n = 15)或两个干预组之一(n = 28)。干预措施包括三个部分:(i)一门课程;(ii)午餐前强制每日洗手;(iii)学校厕所额外清洁。本研究的目的是评估实施情况并确定项目实施过程中的挑战。使用了多个数据来源,包括对学校厕所的观察、对学校协调员的半结构化访谈(n = 4)、与学生(n = 6)和教师(n = 5)的焦点小组讨论,以及对学生(n = 5440)、教师(n = 387)和学校协调员(n = 28)的问卷调查。本研究表明,该课程在大多数学校成功实施,教师和学生对干预措施的这一部分反应积极。然而,午餐前每日洗手似乎难以实施。总体而言,实施过程受到几个因素的影响,如卫生设施差、时间不足和缺乏优先级,以及对将育儿任务责任日益增加地置于学校的反对意见。本研究揭示了“嗨,五”研究的优缺点,并可为项目改进提供指导。

相似文献

1
Process evaluation of a multi-component intervention to reduce infectious diseases and improve hygiene and well-being among school children: the Hi Five study.一项旨在减少学龄儿童传染病、改善卫生状况和健康水平的多组分干预措施的过程评估:“嗨,五”研究
Health Educ Res. 2015 Jun;30(3):497-512. doi: 10.1093/her/cyv019. Epub 2015 May 11.
2
The Hi Five study: design of a school-based randomized trial to reduce infections and improve hygiene and well-being among 6-15 year olds in Denmark.“嗨,五”研究:一项丹麦6至15岁儿童的校内随机试验设计,旨在减少感染并改善卫生状况与健康水平
BMC Public Health. 2015 Mar 1;15:207. doi: 10.1186/s12889-015-1556-1.
3
Kenyan school book knowledge for water, sanitation, hygiene and health education interventions: Disconnect, integration or opportunities?肯尼亚学校教材中的水、环境卫生和个人卫生教育干预措施:脱节、整合还是机遇?
Int J Hyg Environ Health. 2021 Jun;235:113756. doi: 10.1016/j.ijheh.2021.113756. Epub 2021 May 15.
4
A process evaluation of the walking in ScHools (WISH) study using the RE-AIM framework.一项使用RE-AIM框架对学校步行(WISH)研究进行的过程评估。
BMC Public Health. 2025 Mar 3;25(1):844. doi: 10.1186/s12889-025-21434-y.
5
High impact of implementation on school-based smoking prevention: the X:IT study-a cluster-randomized smoking prevention trial.实施对学校吸烟预防的高度影响:X:IT研究——一项整群随机吸烟预防试验
Implement Sci. 2016 Sep 17;11(1):125. doi: 10.1186/s13012-016-0490-7.
6
Process evaluation of a sport-for-health intervention to prevent smoking amongst primary school children: SmokeFree Sports.一项预防小学生吸烟的健康运动干预措施(无烟运动)的过程评估。
BMC Public Health. 2015 Apr 10;15:347. doi: 10.1186/s12889-015-1645-1.
7
Effect Evaluation of a Randomized Trial to Reduce Infectious Illness and Illness-related Absenteeism Among Schoolchildren: The Hi Five Study.一项旨在减少学童传染性疾病及因病缺勤情况的随机试验的效果评估:“嗨,五”研究
Pediatr Infect Dis J. 2018 Jan;37(1):16-21. doi: 10.1097/INF.0000000000001686.
8
Implementation of an educational intervention to improve hand washing in primary schools: process evaluation within a randomised controlled trial.实施教育干预以改善小学的洗手习惯:一项随机对照试验中的过程评估。
BMC Public Health. 2013 Aug 15;13:757. doi: 10.1186/1471-2458-13-757.
9
[Evaluation of the effect of the health education intervention project "Healthy School"].["健康教育干预项目“健康学校”的效果评估"]
Srp Arh Celok Lek. 1998 May-Jun;126(5-6):164-70.
10
A cluster randomized controlled trial of the be the best you can be intervention: effects on the psychological and physical well-being of school children.一项“尽你所能”干预措施的整群随机对照试验:对学童心理和身体健康的影响。
BMC Public Health. 2013 Jul 17;13:666. doi: 10.1186/1471-2458-13-666.

引用本文的文献

1
Feasibility and acceptability of school-based intervention components to promote healthy weight and well-being among 6-11-year-olds in Denmark: mixed methods findings from the Generation Healthy Kids feasibility study.丹麦基于学校的干预措施对促进 6-11 岁儿童健康体重和健康的可行性和可接受性:从 Generation Healthy Kids 可行性研究中得出的混合方法研究结果。
BMC Public Health. 2024 Nov 19;24(1):3208. doi: 10.1186/s12889-024-20605-7.
2
Preschool teachers display a flexible pattern of pedagogical actions in promoting healthy habits in children.幼儿教师在促进儿童养成健康习惯方面表现出灵活的教学行为模式。
Front Psychol. 2023 Apr 24;14:1172460. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2023.1172460. eCollection 2023.
3
Preventing Stress among High School Students in Denmark through the Multicomponent Healthy High School Intervention-The Effectiveness at First Follow-Up.
通过多组分健康高中干预预防丹麦高中生压力——首次随访时的效果。
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2023 Jan 18;20(3):1754. doi: 10.3390/ijerph20031754.
4
Impact of cocreation training capsules for preschool teachers on children's healthy habits: a pilot study conducted in Barcelona, Spain.幼儿园教师共创培训胶囊对儿童健康习惯的影响:在西班牙巴塞罗那进行的一项试点研究。
BMC Public Health. 2021 Nov 14;21(1):2089. doi: 10.1186/s12889-021-12160-2.
5
Rinse-free hand wash for reducing absenteeism among preschool and school children.免洗洗手液可减少学龄前儿童和学生的缺勤率。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2020 Apr 9;4(4):CD012566. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD012566.pub2.
6
Effectiveness and Efficiency of Persuasive Space Graphics (PSG) in Motivating UK Primary School Children's Hand Hygiene.劝导性空间图形(PSG)在激励英国小学生手部卫生习惯方面的效果和效率。
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2020 Mar 31;17(7):2351. doi: 10.3390/ijerph17072351.