Department of Microbiology and Center of Infectious Disease, School of Basic Medical Sciences, Peking University Health Science Center, Beijing, China.
Beijing Youan Hospital, Capital Medical University, Beijing, China.
J Clin Microbiol. 2017 Oct;55(10):2972-2982. doi: 10.1128/JCM.00760-17. Epub 2017 Jul 26.
The study was designed to investigate whether serum hepatitis B virus (HBV) RNA is a strong surrogate marker for intrahepatic HBV covalently closed circular DNA (cccDNA) compared with serum HBV DNA, hepatitis B surface antigen (HBsAg), and hepatitis B e antigen (HBeAg) in HBeAg-positive chronic hepatitis B (CHB) patients. Serum HBV RNA, HBV DNA, HBsAg, HBeAg, and intrahepatic cccDNA were quantitatively detected at baseline ( = 82) and 96 weeks ( = 62) after treatment with nucleos(t)ide analogue (NUC) in HBeAg-positive CHB patients. The correlations among serum HBV RNA, HBV DNA, HBsAg, HBeAg, and intrahepatic cccDNA levels were then statistically analyzed. The results showed that pretreatment intrahepatic cccDNA levels correlated better with serum HBV DNA levels ( = 0.36, < 0.01) than with serum HBV RNA levels ( = 0.25, = 0.02), whereas no correlations were found between pretreatment intrahepatic cccDNA levels and HBsAg ( = 0.15, = 0.17) or HBeAg ( = 0.07, = 0.56) levels. At 96 weeks after NUC treatment, intrahepatic cccDNA levels correlated well with HBsAg levels ( = 0.39, < 0.01) but not with serum HBV RNA, HBV DNA, and HBeAg levels (all > 0.05). Besides, the decline in the intrahepatic cccDNA level from baseline to week 96 correlated better with the reduction in the serum HBsAg levels than with the decreases in the levels of the other markers (for the HBsAg decline, = 0.38, < 0.01; for the HBV DNA decline, = 0.35, = 0.01; for the HBV RNA decline, = 0.28, < 0.05; for the HBeAg decline, = 0.18, = 0.19). In conclusion, the baseline serum HBV RNA level or its decline after 96 weeks of NUC therapy correlated with the corresponding intrahepatic cccDNA level, while it was less than that seen with serum HBV DNA at baseline and HBsAg (or its decline) at 96 weeks after treatment, respectively.
本研究旨在探讨慢性乙型肝炎(CHB)患者 HBeAg 阳性时,血清乙型肝炎病毒(HBV)RNA 与 HBV DNA、乙型肝炎表面抗原(HBsAg)、乙型肝炎 e 抗原(HBeAg)相比,是否能更好地作为检测肝内 HBV 共价闭合环状 DNA(cccDNA)的替代标志物。核苷(酸)类似物(NUC)治疗 HBeAg 阳性 CHB 患者 96 周时,定量检测患者治疗前(n = 82)和治疗后(n = 62)的血清 HBV RNA、HBV DNA、HBsAg、HBeAg 和肝内 cccDNA。然后,对血清 HBV RNA、HBV DNA、HBsAg、HBeAg 和肝内 cccDNA 水平之间的相关性进行统计学分析。结果显示,治疗前肝内 cccDNA 水平与血清 HBV DNA 水平相关性更好(r = 0.36, < 0.01),与血清 HBV RNA 水平相关性稍差(r = 0.25, = 0.02),而与 HBsAg(r = 0.15, = 0.17)或 HBeAg(r = 0.07, = 0.56)水平无相关性。NUC 治疗 96 周后,肝内 cccDNA 水平与 HBsAg 水平相关性较好(r = 0.39, < 0.01),但与血清 HBV RNA、HBV DNA 和 HBeAg 水平均无相关性(均 > 0.05)。此外,与其他标志物相比,基线至 96 周时肝内 cccDNA 水平的下降与 HBsAg 水平的下降相关性更好(HBsAg 下降时 r = 0.38, < 0.01;HBV DNA 下降时 r = 0.35, = 0.01;HBV RNA 下降时 r = 0.28, < 0.05;HBeAg 下降时 r = 0.18, = 0.19)。总之,基线时血清 HBV RNA 水平或 NUC 治疗 96 周后的下降水平与相应的肝内 cccDNA 水平相关,但与基线时的血清 HBV DNA 水平和治疗 96 周后的 HBsAg(或其下降水平)相比相关性更差。