• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

相似文献

1
Medicare Spending for Breast, Prostate, Lung, and Colorectal Cancer Patients in the Year of Diagnosis and Year of Death.医疗保险在诊断年度和死亡年度对乳腺癌、前列腺癌、肺癌和结直肠癌患者的支出。
Health Serv Res. 2018 Aug;53(4):2118-2132. doi: 10.1111/1475-6773.12745. Epub 2017 Jul 26.
2
Depression treatment and healthcare expenditures among elderly Medicare beneficiaries with newly diagnosed depression and incident breast, colorectal, or prostate cancer.老年医疗保险受益人中患有新发抑郁症且患有乳腺癌、结直肠癌或前列腺癌的患者的抑郁症治疗和医疗保健支出。
Psychooncology. 2017 Dec;26(12):2215-2223. doi: 10.1002/pon.4325. Epub 2017 Jan 24.
3
Area-level variations in cancer care and outcomes.癌症治疗和结果的地区水平差异。
Med Care. 2012 May;50(5):366-73. doi: 10.1097/MLR.0b013e31824d74c0.
4
Assessing non-cancer-related health status of US cancer patients: other-cause survival and comorbidity prevalence.评估美国癌症患者的非癌症相关健康状况:其他原因生存率和合并症患病率。
Am J Epidemiol. 2013 Aug 1;178(3):339-49. doi: 10.1093/aje/kws580. Epub 2013 Jul 3.
5
Annual Report to the Nation on the status of cancer, 1975-2010, featuring prevalence of comorbidity and impact on survival among persons with lung, colorectal, breast, or prostate cancer.《1975-2010 年全国癌症报告:肺癌、结直肠癌、乳腺癌和前列腺癌患者合并症的流行情况及其对生存的影响》
Cancer. 2014 May 1;120(9):1290-314. doi: 10.1002/cncr.28509. Epub 2013 Dec 16.
6
Greater Spending Associated with Improved Survival for Some Cancers in OCM-Defined Episodes.在 OCM 定义的病例中,某些癌症的较高支出与生存改善相关。
J Manag Care Spec Pharm. 2018 Jun;24(6):504-513. doi: 10.18553/jmcp.2018.24.6.504.
7
Estimating Costs of Care Attributable to Cancer: Does the Choice of Comparison Group Matter?评估癌症相关医疗费用:选择对照组有影响吗?
Health Serv Res. 2018 Aug;53 Suppl 1(Suppl Suppl 1):3227-3244. doi: 10.1111/1475-6773.12760. Epub 2017 Aug 31.
8
Predictors of high-intensity care at the end of life among older adults with solid tumors: A population-based study.预测老年人实体瘤患者生命终末期高强度医疗的因素:一项基于人群的研究。
J Geriatr Oncol. 2024 Jun;15(5):101774. doi: 10.1016/j.jgo.2024.101774. Epub 2024 Apr 26.
9
Regional variation in spending and survival for older adults with advanced cancer.老年晚期癌症患者的支出和生存的地区差异。
J Natl Cancer Inst. 2013 May 1;105(9):634-42. doi: 10.1093/jnci/djt025. Epub 2013 Mar 12.
10
Population-level changes in outcomes and Medicare cost following the introduction of new cancer therapies.新癌症疗法问世后,人群水平结局和医疗保险成本的变化。
Health Serv Res. 2021 Jun;56(3):486-496. doi: 10.1111/1475-6773.13624. Epub 2021 Mar 7.

引用本文的文献

1
Cost trends of metastatic renal cell carcinoma therapy: the impact of oral anticancer agents and immunotherapy.转移性肾细胞癌治疗的成本趋势:口服抗癌药物和免疫疗法的影响。
JNCI Cancer Spectr. 2024 Sep 2;8(5). doi: 10.1093/jncics/pkae067.
2
Outcomes of Medicare-covered diabetes self-management training for cancer survivors with diabetes.医疗保险覆盖的糖尿病自我管理培训对糖尿病癌症幸存者的效果。
J Cancer Surviv. 2025 Apr;19(2):534-544. doi: 10.1007/s11764-023-01487-x. Epub 2023 Nov 24.
3
Cost-effectiveness analysis of MRI, CE-CT and 18F-FDG PET/CT for detecting colorectal liver metastases eligible for hepatic resection.磁共振成像(MRI)、对比增强计算机断层扫描(CE-CT)和18F-氟代脱氧葡萄糖正电子发射断层扫描/计算机断层扫描(18F-FDG PET/CT)用于检测适合肝切除的结直肠癌肝转移灶的成本效益分析。
Front Oncol. 2023 Jul 24;13:1161738. doi: 10.3389/fonc.2023.1161738. eCollection 2023.
4
Developing a co-production strategy to facilitate the adoption and implementation of evidence-based colorectal cancer screening interventions for rural health systems: a pilot study.制定一项联合生产战略,以促进农村卫生系统采用和实施基于证据的结直肠癌筛查干预措施:一项试点研究。
Implement Sci Commun. 2022 Dec 13;3(1):131. doi: 10.1186/s43058-022-00375-2.
5
The impact of smartphone applications on bowel preparation, compliance with appointments, cost-effectiveness, and patients' quality of life for the colonoscopy process: A scoping review.智能手机应用程序对结肠镜检查过程中肠道准备、预约依从性、成本效益和患者生活质量的影响:范围综述。
Saudi J Gastroenterol. 2023 Mar-Apr;29(2):71-87. doi: 10.4103/sjg.sjg_207_22.
6
Assessing Suitability of a Colorectal Cancer Screening Program in Oman.评估阿曼结直肠癌筛查项目的适用性。
Cureus. 2022 Jul 19;14(7):e27011. doi: 10.7759/cureus.27011. eCollection 2022 Jul.
7
Colorectal cancer screening in the COVID-19 era.新冠疫情时代的结直肠癌筛查
World J Gastrointest Oncol. 2021 Apr 15;13(4):238-251. doi: 10.4251/wjgo.v13.i4.238.
8
Vitamin D supplementation to the older adult population in Germany has the cost-saving potential of preventing almost 30 000 cancer deaths per year.德国老年人群体补充维生素 D 每年具有节省近 30000 例癌症死亡人数的成本效益。
Mol Oncol. 2021 Aug;15(8):1986-1994. doi: 10.1002/1878-0261.12924. Epub 2021 Mar 10.
9
Randomized Controlled Immunotherapy Clinical Trials for GBM Challenged.针对胶质母细胞瘤的随机对照免疫治疗临床试验面临挑战。
Cancers (Basel). 2020 Dec 24;13(1):32. doi: 10.3390/cancers13010032.
10
A Network Pharmacology-Based Study on the Anti-Lung Cancer Effect of Dipsaci Radix.基于网络药理学的续断抗肺癌作用研究
Evid Based Complement Alternat Med. 2020 Apr 27;2020:7424061. doi: 10.1155/2020/7424061. eCollection 2020.

本文引用的文献

1
Meaningful Physician Payment Reform in Oncology.肿瘤学中有意义的医生薪酬改革。
J Oncol Pract. 2013 Nov;9(6S):49s-53s. doi: 10.1200/JOP.2013.001248.
2
The Role of Patient Factors, Cancer Characteristics, and Treatment Patterns in the Cost of Care for Medicare Beneficiaries with Breast Cancer.患者因素、癌症特征和治疗模式在医疗保险乳腺癌受益人的护理费用中的作用。
Health Serv Res. 2016 Feb;51(1):167-86. doi: 10.1111/1475-6773.12328. Epub 2015 Jun 29.
3
Oncology Care Model: Short- and Long-Term Considerations in the Context of Broader Payment Reform.肿瘤护理模式:在更广泛支付改革背景下的短期和长期考量
J Oncol Pract. 2015 Jul;11(4):319-21. doi: 10.1200/JOP.2015.005777. Epub 2015 Jun 9.
4
Medicare innovation center oncology care model: a toe in the water when a plunge is needed.医疗保险创新中心肿瘤护理模式:需要纵身一跃时却只是浅尝辄止。
J Oncol Pract. 2015 Mar;11(2):117-9. doi: 10.1200/JOP.2014.002899. Epub 2015 Feb 17.
5
Acute hospital care is the chief driver of regional spending variation in Medicare patients with advanced cancer.急性医院护理是晚期癌症医疗保险患者区域支出差异的主要驱动因素。
Health Aff (Millwood). 2014 Oct;33(10):1793-800. doi: 10.1377/hlthaff.2014.0280.
6
Changing physician incentives for affordable, quality cancer care: results of an episode payment model.改变医生对负担得起的优质癌症护理的激励措施:按诊疗事件付费模式的结果
J Oncol Pract. 2014 Sep;10(5):322-6. doi: 10.1200/JOP.2014.001488. Epub 2014 Jul 8.
7
Economic studies in colorectal cancer: challenges in measuring and comparing costs.结直肠癌的经济学研究:成本测量与比较中的挑战
J Natl Cancer Inst Monogr. 2013;2013(46):62-78. doi: 10.1093/jncimonographs/lgt001.
8
Regional variation in spending and survival for older adults with advanced cancer.老年晚期癌症患者的支出和生存的地区差异。
J Natl Cancer Inst. 2013 May 1;105(9):634-42. doi: 10.1093/jnci/djt025. Epub 2013 Mar 12.
9
Economic burden of cancer in the United States: estimates, projections, and future research.美国癌症的经济负担:估计、预测和未来研究。
Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev. 2011 Oct;20(10):2006-14. doi: 10.1158/1055-9965.EPI-11-0650.
10
Projections of the cost of cancer care in the United States: 2010-2020.美国癌症护理成本预测:2010-2020 年。
J Natl Cancer Inst. 2011 Jan 19;103(2):117-28. doi: 10.1093/jnci/djq495. Epub 2011 Jan 12.

医疗保险在诊断年度和死亡年度对乳腺癌、前列腺癌、肺癌和结直肠癌患者的支出。

Medicare Spending for Breast, Prostate, Lung, and Colorectal Cancer Patients in the Year of Diagnosis and Year of Death.

机构信息

Massachusetts General Hospital, Department of Medicine, Boston, MA.

Division of Population Sciences, Dana Farber Cancer Institute, Boston, MA.

出版信息

Health Serv Res. 2018 Aug;53(4):2118-2132. doi: 10.1111/1475-6773.12745. Epub 2017 Jul 26.

DOI:10.1111/1475-6773.12745
PMID:28748564
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC6051983/
Abstract

OBJECTIVE

To characterize spending patterns for Medicare patients with incident breast, prostate, lung, and colorectal cancer.

DATA SOURCES/STUDY SETTING/STUDY DESIGN: 2007-2012 data from the Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results Program linked with Medicare fee-for-service claims.

DATA COLLECTION/EXTRACTION METHODS: We calculate per-patient monthly and yearly mean and median expenditures, by cancer type, stage at diagnosis, and spending category, over the years of diagnosis and death.

PRINCIPAL FINDINGS

Over the year of diagnosis, mean spending was $35,849, $26,295, $55,597, and $63,063 for breast, prostate, lung, and colorectal cancer, respectively. Over the year of death, spending was similar across different cancer types and stage at diagnosis.

CONCLUSIONS

Characterization of Medicare spending according to clinically meaningful categories may assist development of oncology alternative payment models and cost-effectiveness models.

摘要

目的

描述医疗保险患者中乳腺癌、前列腺癌、肺癌和结直肠癌患者的支出模式。

数据来源/研究设置/研究设计:2007 年至 2012 年来自监测、流行病学和最终结果计划的数据,与医疗保险按服务收费的索赔相联系。

数据收集/提取方法:我们按癌症类型、诊断时的阶段和支出类别,计算诊断和死亡年份的每位患者每月和每年的平均和中位数支出。

主要发现

在诊断年度内,乳腺癌、前列腺癌、肺癌和结直肠癌的平均支出分别为 35849 美元、26295 美元、55597 美元和 63063 美元。在死亡年度内,不同癌症类型和诊断时的阶段的支出相似。

结论

根据有临床意义的类别对医疗保险支出进行描述,可能有助于制定肿瘤学替代支付模式和成本效益模型。