Moore Martin D
Soc Hist Med. 2016 May;29(2):384-404. doi: 10.1093/shm/hkv130. Epub 2015 Nov 12.
Recent studies of post-war chronic disease epidemiology have generally focused on the histories of research in the USA and UK. Using the archival records of a major British funding body, the Colonial Medical Research Committee and its successor the Tropical Medical Research Board, this article demonstrates the advantages of bringing a post-colonial analytic to this historiography. It highlights how the administrative and medical interests in population difference at the centre of the new epidemiology came to map onto political apparatus initially created to know, reform and govern colonial subjects. Although detached from imperial aims, British medical scientists nonetheless attached value to colonial populations on the basis of British benefit and turned various sites into laboratories to extract it. This relationship did not die with the end of imperial rule. British scientists continued to pursue chronic disease epidemiology in former colonies well into the post-war period, informing debates about Britain's own public health concerns.
近期对战后慢性病流行病学的研究普遍聚焦于美国和英国的研究历史。本文利用英国一个主要资助机构——殖民地医学研究委员会及其继任者热带医学研究委员会的档案记录,展示了将后殖民分析应用于这一史学研究的优势。文章强调了新流行病学核心中对人群差异的行政和医学关注是如何映射到最初为了解、改革和治理殖民地臣民而建立的政治机构上的。尽管与帝国目标相脱离,但英国医学科学家基于英国的利益,仍然重视殖民地人口,并将各个地方变成了获取利益的实验室。这种关系并没有随着帝国统治的结束而消亡。直到战后很长一段时间,英国科学家仍在前殖民地继续进行慢性病流行病学研究,为有关英国自身公共卫生问题的辩论提供了信息。