Thompson Mark E
Department of Anesthesiology State University of New York at Buffalo, Buffalo NY, USA.
Department of Anesthesiology Texas Tech University of Health Sciences, Lubbock TX, USA.
Turk J Anaesthesiol Reanim. 2017 Jun;45(3):153-157. doi: 10.5152/TJAR.2017.67535. Epub 2017 Feb 1.
Ultrasound-guided (USG) cannulation of the brachiocephalic vein (BCV) has been shown to be technically easy. We hypothesised that adoption of USG in-plane cannulation of the BCV as the primary approach to central venous cannulation at our institution would lead to central venous cannulation for a greater variety of indications.
We performed retrospective, descriptive comparison of all central lines placed in patients aged <16 years who underwent any surgical operation during calendar years 2012-2014 at a small, free-standing children's hospital. The use and management of a central line was reviewed until the patient was discharged from the hospital. Analysis of the data was performed using simple comparative statistical methods.
Forty-nine patients were identified, 20 who weighed <10 kg and 29 who weighed >10 kg. Cannulation was successful in all patients. No significant late complications occurred. Catheters were well tolerated post-operatively, with no accidental dislodgement and no removal because of discomfort. The average duration of insertion was 6.3 (3-20±3.77) days. Nine catheters were placed for access during emergency surgery. 15 were placed in patients with difficult peripheral intravenous (PIV) access. The central lines remained in place until discharge in 79.6% of patients. In 40% of patients, the PIV catheter was removed, and the central line was retained because of preference. Total parenteral nutrition (TPN) was administered in 11 (22.4%) patients.
Cannulation of BCV was well tolerated by children, with an average insertion duration of 6.3 days, which often lasted beyond the removal/failure of the PIV cannula. Catheters were useful for primary venous access during hospitalisation and for short TPN courses.
超声引导(USG)下的头臂静脉(BCV)置管在技术上已被证明是容易的。我们假设,在我们机构将USG平面内BCV置管作为中心静脉置管的主要方法,将能用于更多种适应证的中心静脉置管。
我们对2012 - 2014历年在一家小型独立儿童医院接受任何外科手术的16岁以下患者所置入的所有中心静脉导管进行回顾性、描述性比较。对中心静脉导管的使用和管理进行回顾,直至患者出院。使用简单的比较统计方法进行数据分析。
共确定49例患者,其中20例体重<10 kg,29例体重>10 kg。所有患者置管均成功。未发生明显的晚期并发症。术后导管耐受性良好,无意外移位,也未因不适而拔除。平均置管时间为6.3(3 - 20±3.77)天。9根导管是在急诊手术时为建立通路而置入的。15根导管置入外周静脉(PIV)穿刺困难的患者。79.6%的患者中心静脉导管保留至出院。40%的患者,PIV导管被拔除,因更倾向使用而保留中心静脉导管。11例(22.4%)患者接受了全胃肠外营养(TPN)。
儿童对头臂静脉置管耐受性良好,平均置管时间为6.3天,这一置管时间常常超过PIV套管拔除/失败的时间。导管对于住院期间的主要静脉通路建立以及短期TPN疗程是有用的。