• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

疫情与紧急情况下的研究:加勒比地区两个国家的合作与加快伦理审查模式

Research in epidemic and emergency situations: A model for collaboration and expediting ethics review in two Caribbean countries.

作者信息

Aarons Derrick

出版信息

Dev World Bioeth. 2018 Dec;18(4):375-384. doi: 10.1111/dewb.12157. Epub 2017 Jul 28.

DOI:10.1111/dewb.12157
PMID:28752914
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC6586066/
Abstract

Various forms of research are essential in emergency, disaster and disease outbreak situations, but challenges exist including the long length of time it takes to get research proposals approved. Consequently, it would be very advantageous to have an acceptable model for efficient coordination and communication between and among research ethics committees/IRBs and ministries of health, and templates for expediting (done with speed and efficiency) ethical review of research proposals in emergency and epidemic situations to be used across the Caribbean and in other low and middle income countries. This project involved a literature search and the interviewing of ministry of health officials, public health practitioners, and research ethics committee/IRB members in Jamaica and St. Lucia, to obtain suggestions for the best model for efficient coordination and communication between research ethics committees (RECs), and developed a template for expediting review of research protocols in epidemic and emergency conditions.

摘要

在紧急情况、灾难和疾病爆发情况下,各种形式的研究至关重要,但也存在挑战,包括研究提案获批所需的时间较长。因此,拥有一个可接受的模式,用于研究伦理委员会/机构审查委员会与卫生部之间以及它们相互之间进行高效协调和沟通,并拥有加快(快速且高效地完成)紧急和疫情情况下研究提案伦理审查的模板,以便在加勒比地区以及其他低收入和中等收入国家使用,将非常有利。该项目包括文献检索,以及对牙买加和圣卢西亚的卫生部官员、公共卫生从业者和研究伦理委员会/机构审查委员会成员进行访谈,以获取关于研究伦理委员会(RECs)之间高效协调和沟通的最佳模式的建议,并制定了在疫情和紧急情况下加快研究方案审查的模板。

相似文献

1
Research in epidemic and emergency situations: A model for collaboration and expediting ethics review in two Caribbean countries.疫情与紧急情况下的研究:加勒比地区两个国家的合作与加快伦理审查模式
Dev World Bioeth. 2018 Dec;18(4):375-384. doi: 10.1111/dewb.12157. Epub 2017 Jul 28.
2
Addressing the challenge for expedient ethical review of research in disasters and disease outbreaks.解决灾害和疾病暴发研究中快速伦理审查的挑战。
Bioethics. 2019 Mar;33(3):343-346. doi: 10.1111/bioe.12543. Epub 2018 Dec 4.
3
Research Ethics Committees (RECs) and epidemic response in low and middle income countries.低收入和中等收入国家的研究伦理委员会与疫情应对
Pan Afr Med J. 2018 Nov 28;31:209. doi: 10.11604/pamj.2018.31.209.17076. eCollection 2018.
4
Ethics review of studies during public health emergencies - the experience of the WHO ethics review committee during the Ebola virus disease epidemic.突发公共卫生事件期间研究的伦理审查——世界卫生组织伦理审查委员会在埃博拉病毒病疫情期间的经验
BMC Med Ethics. 2017 Jun 26;18(1):43. doi: 10.1186/s12910-017-0201-1.
5
Familiar ethical issues amplified: how members of research ethics committees describe ethical distinctions between disaster and non-disaster research.常见伦理问题的放大:研究伦理委员会成员如何描述灾害研究与非灾害研究之间的伦理差异。
BMC Med Ethics. 2017 Jun 28;18(1):44. doi: 10.1186/s12910-017-0203-z.
6
Ethics preparedness: facilitating ethics review during outbreaks - recommendations from an expert panel.伦理准备:在疫情期间促进伦理审查——专家小组的建议。
BMC Med Ethics. 2019 May 6;20(1):29. doi: 10.1186/s12910-019-0366-x.
7
Boosting ethics review capacity in public health emergency situations: Co-creation of a training model for French-speaking research ethics committees.提升突发公共卫生事件中的伦理审查能力:为说法语的研究伦理委员会共同创建培训模式。
Trop Med Int Health. 2022 Oct;27(10):934-940. doi: 10.1111/tmi.13815. Epub 2022 Sep 5.
8
Readiness of ethics review systems for a changing public health landscape in the WHO African Region.世卫组织非洲区域伦理审查系统应对不断变化的公共卫生形势的准备情况。
BMC Med Ethics. 2015 Dec 2;16(1):82. doi: 10.1186/s12910-015-0078-9.
9
Documentary Assessment of the Abilities of Kyrgyzstan's Research Ethics Committees During Public Health Emergency and Non-Emergency Situations.在公共卫生紧急和非紧急情况下,对吉尔吉斯斯坦研究伦理委员会能力的文献评估。
J Empir Res Hum Res Ethics. 2023 Jul;18(3):99-108. doi: 10.1177/15562646231176711. Epub 2023 May 18.
10
The Challenge of Timely, Responsive and Rigorous Ethics Review of Disaster Research: Views of Research Ethics Committee Members.灾害研究及时、有效且严格的伦理审查面临的挑战:研究伦理委员会成员的观点
PLoS One. 2016 Jun 21;11(6):e0157142. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0157142. eCollection 2016.

引用本文的文献

1
One Health research ethics review processes in African countries: Challenges and opportunities.非洲国家的“同一健康”研究伦理审查程序:挑战与机遇
One Health. 2024 Mar 22;18:100716. doi: 10.1016/j.onehlt.2024.100716. eCollection 2024 Jun.
2
A scoping review of ethics review processes during public health emergencies in Africa.非洲突发公共卫生事件中的伦理审查流程的范围综述。
BMC Med Ethics. 2024 May 22;25(1):63. doi: 10.1186/s12910-024-01054-8.
3
Research ethics during infectious disease outbreaks: A survey of African research stakeholders using the Ebola virus disease outbreak as a case.传染病暴发期间的研究伦理:以埃博拉病毒病暴发为例对非洲研究利益相关者的调查
J Public Health Afr. 2023 Oct 24;14(9):1632. doi: 10.4081/jphia.2023.1632. eCollection 2023 Oct 1.
4
Enhancing Reciprocity, Equity and Quality of Ethics Review for Multisite Research During Public Health Crises: The Experience of the COVID-19 Clinical Research Coalition Ethics Working Group.加强公共卫生危机期间多地点研究的伦理审查的互惠性、公平性和质量:COVID-19 临床研究联盟伦理工作组的经验。
J Law Med Ethics. 2023;51(2):258-270. doi: 10.1017/jme.2023.75. Epub 2023 Sep 1.
5
Ethical review of COVID-19 research in the Netherlands; a mixed-method evaluation among medical research ethics committees and investigators.荷兰 COVID-19 研究的伦理审查:医学研究伦理委员会和研究者的混合方法评估。
PLoS One. 2021 Jul 23;16(7):e0255040. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0255040. eCollection 2021.
6
Obstacles and Considerations Related to Clinical Trial Research During the COVID-19 Pandemic.2019年冠状病毒病大流行期间与临床试验研究相关的障碍和考量因素
Front Med (Lausanne). 2020 Dec 23;7:598038. doi: 10.3389/fmed.2020.598038. eCollection 2020.
7
A systematic literature review of the ethics of conducting research in the humanitarian setting.关于在人道主义环境中开展研究的伦理问题的系统文献综述。
Confl Health. 2020 May 24;14:27. doi: 10.1186/s13031-020-00282-0. eCollection 2020.
8
Challenges and strategies to research ethics in conducting COVID-19 research.开展 COVID-19 研究的伦理挑战与策略。
J Evid Based Med. 2020 May;13(2):173-177. doi: 10.1111/jebm.12388. Epub 2020 May 22.
9
Confronting the Multidimensional Challenges of Research in the Context of Emerging Infectious Diseases in Brazil: The Example of Yellow Fever.直面巴西新发传染病研究的多维挑战:以黄热病为例。
Am J Trop Med Hyg. 2020 Jul;103(1):38-40. doi: 10.4269/ajtmh.19-0559. Epub 2020 Mar 26.
10
Ethics preparedness: facilitating ethics review during outbreaks - recommendations from an expert panel.伦理准备:在疫情期间促进伦理审查——专家小组的建议。
BMC Med Ethics. 2019 May 6;20(1):29. doi: 10.1186/s12910-019-0366-x.