Bruno William, Haar Rohini J
Department of Emergency Medicine, University of Southern California, Keck School of Medicine, Los Angeles, USA.
Division of Epidemiology and Biostatistics, School of Public Health, Research Fellow, Human Rights Center, School of Law, University of California at Berkeley, Berkeley, USA.
Confl Health. 2020 May 24;14:27. doi: 10.1186/s13031-020-00282-0. eCollection 2020.
Research around humanitarian crises, aid delivery, and the impact of these crises on health and well-being has expanded dramatically. Ethical issues around these topics have recently received more attention. We conducted a systematic literature review to synthesize the lessons learned regarding the ethics of research in humanitarian crises.
We conducted a systematic review using the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-analysis (PRISMA) guidelines to identify articles regarding the ethics of research in humanitarian contexts between January 1, 1997 and September 1, 2019. We analyzed the articles to extract key themes and develop an agenda for future research.
We identified 52 articles that matched our inclusion criteria. We categorized the article data into five categories of analysis: 32 were expert statements, 18 were case studies, 11 contained original research, eight were literature reviews and three were book chapters. All included articles were published in English. Using a step-wise qualitative analysis, we identified 10 major themes that encompassed these concepts and points. These major themes were: (21 articles, [40.38%]); (15 articles [28.85%]); , or necessity that research be both academically sound and policy driven, (13 articles for each, [25.0%)]; (10 articles [19.23%]); (6 articles, [11.54%]); (5 articles, [9.62%]); (4 articles [7.69%]); and finally , and (2 articles for each [3.85%]).
Interest in the ethics of studying humanitarian crises has been dramatically increasing in recent years. While key concepts within all research settings such as beneficence, justice and respect for persons are crucially relevant, there are considerations unique to the humanitarian context. The particular vulnerabilities of conflict-affected populations, the contextual challenges of working in humanitarian settings, and the need for ensuring strong community engagement at all levels make this area of research particularly challenging. Humanitarian crises are prevalent throughout the globe, and studying them with the utmost ethical forethought is critical to maintaining sound research principles and ethical standards.
围绕人道主义危机、援助交付以及这些危机对健康和福祉的影响的研究已大幅扩展。近期,围绕这些主题的伦理问题受到了更多关注。我们进行了一项系统的文献综述,以总结在人道主义危机中开展研究的伦理方面的经验教训。
我们按照系统评价和Meta分析的首选报告项目(PRISMA)指南进行系统综述,以识别1997年1月1日至2019年9月1日期间关于人道主义背景下研究伦理的文章。我们对这些文章进行分析,以提取关键主题并制定未来研究议程。
我们识别出52篇符合纳入标准的文章。我们将文章数据分为五类分析:32篇为专家陈述,18篇为案例研究,11篇包含原创研究,8篇为文献综述,3篇为书籍章节。所有纳入文章均以英文发表。通过逐步定性分析,我们识别出涵盖这些概念和要点的10个主要主题。这些主要主题为:(21篇文章,[40.38%]);(15篇文章[28.85%]);研究在学术上合理且由政策驱动的适宜性或必要性,(各13篇文章,[25.0%]);(10篇文章[19.23%]);(6篇文章,[11.54%]);(5篇文章,[9.62%]);(4篇文章[7.69%]);最后是,以及(各2篇文章[3.85%])。
近年来,对研究人道主义危机的伦理的兴趣急剧增加。虽然所有研究环境中的关键概念,如行善、公正和尊重人都至关重要,但人道主义背景有其独特的考量。受冲突影响人群的特殊脆弱性、在人道主义环境中工作的背景挑战以及确保各级社区积极参与的必要性,使得这一研究领域极具挑战性。人道主义危机在全球普遍存在,以最大程度的伦理前瞻性对其进行研究对于维护健全的研究原则和伦理标准至关重要。