Physiotherapy Department, Pantein Healthcare, Boxmeer, the Netherlands.
Department of Neurology, Radboud University Medical Center, Nijmegen, the Netherlands.
J Geriatr Phys Ther. 2019 Jul/Sep;42(3):E1-E16. doi: 10.1519/JPT.0000000000000140.
This article reports on a recent randomized clinical trial that showed a personalized approach to physical therapy (Coach2Move) by a physical therapist specialized in geriatrics (PTG) to be more cost-effective than usual physical therapy care in people with mobility problems (n = 130, mean age = 78 years).
We used an explanatory mixed-methods sequential design alongside the randomized clinical trial to gain insight into (a) the contrast between the 2 interventions, (b) the fidelity of the Coach2Move delivery; (c) PTGs' experiences of Coach2Move; and (d) possible barriers and facilitators for future implementation. The study included 13 PTGs educated in the strategy and 13 physical therapists with expertise in geriatrics delivering the usual care. In total, 106 medical records were available for assessment: 57 (85%) Coach2Move, 49 (75%) usual care. Quantitative process indicators were used to analyze electronic medical records to determine contrasts in the phases of clinical reasoning. The fidelity of the delivery was tested using indicator scores focusing on 4 key elements of Coach2Move. In-depth interviews with Coach2Move therapists were thematically analyzed to explore experiences and facilitators/barriers related to implementation.
Indicator scores showed significant and clinically relevant contrasts in all phases of clinical reasoning, with consistently higher scores among PTGs, except for the treatment plan. Moreover, the fidelity of Coach2Move delivery was more than 70% in all phases, except the evaluation phase (53%). Experiences of Coach2Move were positive. In particular, extended intake allowing motivational interviewing, physical examination and an in-depth problem analysis, and shared goal setting were considered valuable. Facilitators for implementation were the addition of a Coach2Move medical record, frequent coaching by the researcher, and readiness to change in the therapist. Barriers were (1) having to use 2 parallel electronic medical record systems, (2) having to clear the calendar to schedule an intake of 90 minutes, (3) fear of losing income, (4) the sense that patients do not want to change their lifestyle, and (5) not acknowledging that increasing physical activity is an important goal for older adults with mobility problems.
Physical therapy based on the Coach2Move strategy is substantially different from usual care. Future implementation should focus on increasing regular evaluation and feedback, taking into account individuals' contextual factors, and improving organizational facilities while mitigating income loss.
本文报告了一项最近的随机临床试验结果,该试验表明,由老年病学物理治疗师(PTG)提供的个性化物理治疗方法(Coach2Move)比常规物理治疗更具成本效益,适用于有行动问题的人群(n=130,平均年龄=78 岁)。
我们采用解释性混合方法序贯设计,结合随机临床试验,深入了解(a)两种干预措施之间的差异,(b)Coach2Move 实施的保真度;(c)PTG 对 Coach2Move 的体验;以及(d)未来实施的可能障碍和促进因素。该研究包括 13 名接受该策略培训的物理治疗师和 13 名具有老年病学专业知识的物理治疗师,提供常规护理。共有 106 份病历可用于评估:57 份(85%)为 Coach2Move,49 份(75%)为常规护理。使用电子病历中的定量过程指标来分析临床推理的各个阶段,以确定差异。使用重点关注 Coach2Move 四个关键要素的指标得分来测试交付的保真度。对接受 Coach2Move 治疗的治疗师进行深入访谈,对实施相关的经验和促进因素/障碍进行主题分析。
指标得分显示,在临床推理的所有阶段都存在显著且具有临床意义的差异,除治疗计划外,PTG 的得分始终更高。此外,除评估阶段(53%)外,Coach2Move 交付的保真度在所有阶段均超过 70%。对 Coach2Move 的体验是积极的。特别是,扩展的摄入允许进行动机访谈、体检和深入的问题分析,以及共同设定目标,被认为是有价值的。实施的促进因素是增加 Coach2Move 病历、研究人员频繁指导以及治疗师愿意改变。障碍包括:(1)必须同时使用两个平行的电子病历系统;(2)必须安排 90 分钟的摄入时间,以便清除日程安排;(3)担心收入损失;(4)患者不想改变生活方式的感觉;以及(5)不承认增加身体活动对有行动问题的老年人来说是一个重要目标。
基于 Coach2Move 策略的物理治疗与常规护理有很大的不同。未来的实施应侧重于增加定期评估和反馈,同时考虑个人的背景因素,并改善组织设施,同时减轻收入损失。