Departments of Preventive Medicine and.
Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation, Rush University Medical Center, Chicago, IL, USA.
Pain. 2017 Sep;158(9):1656-1665. doi: 10.1097/j.pain.0000000000000957.
A growing literature links discrimination to key markers of biobehavioral health. While racial or ethnic differences in pain are seen in experimental and clinical studies, the authors were interested in how chronic discrimination contributes to pain within multiple racial or ethnic groups over time. Participants were 3056 African American, Caucasian, Chinese, Hispanic, and Japanese women from the Study of Women's Health Across the Nation. The Everyday Discrimination Scale was assessed from baseline through 13 follow-up examinations. The bodily pain subscale of the MOS 36-Item Short-Form Health Survey (SF-36) was assessed annually. There were large racial or ethnic differences in reports of discrimination and pain. Discrimination attributions also varied by race or ethnicity. In linear mixed model analyses, initially adjusted for age, education, and pain medications, chronic everyday discrimination was associated with more bodily pain in all ethnic groups (beta = -5.84; P < 0.002 for Japanese; beta = -6.17; P < 0.001 for African American; beta = -8.74; P < 0.001 for Chinese; beta = -10.54; P < 0.001 for Caucasians; beta = -12.82; P < 0.001 for Hispanic). Associations remained significant in all ethnic groups after adjusting for additional covariates in subsequent models until adding depressive symptoms as covariate; in the final fully-adjusted models, discrimination remained a significant predictor of pain for African American (beta = -4.50; P < 0.001), Chinese (beta = -6.62; P < 0.001), and Caucasian (beta = -7.86; P < 0.001) women. In this longitudinal study, experiences of everyday discrimination were strongly linked to reports of bodily pain for the majority of women. Further research is needed to determine if addressing psychosocial stressors, such as discrimination, with patients can enhance clinical management of pain symptoms.
越来越多的文献将歧视与生物行为健康的关键指标联系起来。虽然在实验和临床研究中观察到不同种族或族裔之间的疼痛存在差异,但作者感兴趣的是,随着时间的推移,慢性歧视如何在多个种族或族裔群体中导致疼痛。参与者是来自全国妇女健康研究的 3056 名非裔美国女性、白种人、中国女性、西班牙裔和日本女性。从基线到 13 次随访检查,评估了日常歧视量表。每年评估 MOS 36 项简短健康调查(SF-36)的身体疼痛子量表。报告的歧视和疼痛存在很大的种族或族裔差异。歧视归因也因种族或族裔而异。在线性混合模型分析中,最初根据年龄、教育和止痛药进行调整,慢性日常歧视与所有族裔群体的身体疼痛更相关(日本组的β=-5.84;P<0.002;非裔美国组的β=-6.17;P<0.001;中国组的β=-8.74;P<0.001;白种人组的β=-10.54;P<0.001;西班牙裔组的β=-12.82;P<0.001)。在随后的模型中,根据其他协变量进行调整后,所有族裔群体的关联仍然显著,直到将抑郁症状作为协变量添加;在最终完全调整的模型中,歧视仍然是非裔美国(β=-4.50;P<0.001)、中国(β=-6.62;P<0.001)和白种人(β=-7.86;P<0.001)女性疼痛的重要预测因素。在这项纵向研究中,日常歧视经历与大多数女性的身体疼痛报告密切相关。需要进一步研究确定,通过与患者解决心理社会压力源(如歧视)是否可以增强对疼痛症状的临床管理。